Vietnam Expands Decades Long Effort To Crack Down On Any Dissent Online By Demanding Data Be Kept In The Country

from the wider-impact dept

It’s no secret that the Vietnamese government is no fan of the open internet. All the way back in 2002 we wrote about the government requiring people to register just to create a website. That same year we were writing about people being arrested for posting criticism of the government. In 2008, we wrote about the Vietnamese government banning “subversive” blogs as well. With the rise of social media, Vietnam has shifted its focus there. In 2013, it banned news reporting on social media, saying it should be for personal use only. In 2014, we wrote about how the government was abusing Facebook’s own reporting tools to shut down dissenters from using the site. And at the beginning of this year, we wrote about how the government now employed around 10,000 people whose only job was to monitor the internet for dissent.

And now it’s going to get even worse — to a degree that might even lead some of the big internet companies to leave Vietnam entirely. And we have the NSA (partially) to blame. Ever since the revelation of the Snowden documents, describing how the NSA was getting access to all sorts of data and metadata on foreigners by compelling various private companies to cough up their data, there’s been a big push among some for data localization. Some of that push has come from privacy activists themselves, arguing in other countries that their data shouldn’t be allowed to go to the US where the NSA has so much access — but much of it has simply been using the NSA revelations as a stalking horse to get what they want: which is the ability to snoop locally on all of that data. That’s why countries like Russia has been a huge proponent of data localization.

And now we can add Vietnam to the list. Despite strong condemnation from the US (and US internet companies) it appears that Vietnam wants to require any internet company with Vietnamese users to host that data locally where the government and its thousands of content monitors can snoop on it:

The new draft decree requires companies providing a range of services, including email, social media, video, messaging, banking and e-commerce, to set up offices in Vietnam if they collect, analyze or process personal user data.

The companies would also be required to store a wide range of user data, ranging from financial records and biometric data to information on peoples? ethnicity and political views, or strengths and interests inside Vietnam?s border.

Not surprisingly, the same law gives law enforcement much greater ability to demand data from these platforms, because of course it does. The Vietnamese officials pushing this plan say its necessary for “cybersecurity” which is utter nonsense.

This could be a real test for companies like Facebook and Google and there’s a strong argument they (and others) should seriously consider simply shutting off access in that country, even as both sites are quite popular there. Giving in here will undoubtedly mean having to give in elsewhere, and literally supporting the suppression of political dissent.

Filed Under: , , , ,

Rate this comment as insightful
Rate this comment as funny
You have rated this comment as insightful
You have rated this comment as funny
Flag this comment as abusive/trolling/spam
You have flagged this comment
The first word has already been claimed
The last word has already been claimed
Insightful Lightbulb icon Funny Laughing icon Abusive/trolling/spam Flag icon Insightful badge Lightbulb icon Funny badge Laughing icon Comments icon

Comments on “Vietnam Expands Decades Long Effort To Crack Down On Any Dissent Online By Demanding Data Be Kept In The Country”

Subscribe: RSS Leave a comment
15 Comments
btr1701 (profile) says:

Ignore It

> The new draft decree requires companies providing a range of services, including email, social media, video, messaging, banking and e-commerce, to set up offices in Vietnam if they collect, analyze or process personal user data.

Considering that this requires companies to set up offices, it apparently purports to apply to companies that *don’t* have a physical presence in Vietnam?

If that’s the case, any US company that meets that criteria can just ignore this. Vietnam laws don’t control them if they don’t have a physical presence in the country. Vietnam’s only recourse is to block companies that don’t comply from access within Vietnam.

Vietnam isn’t the super-legislature for the entire world, binding all 7 billion people on the planet with its decrees.

Bergman (profile) says:

Re: Ignore It

Unfortunately, that’s not necessarily true. It is against federal law in the US to violate the laws of any country in certain ways. The Lacey Act, for example, sent a US resident to prison for violating a Honduran law (that it had been repealed before he ‘broke’ it was deemed irrelevant by the court), despite the fact he had never been to Honduras.

Anonymous Coward says:

> Giving in here will undoubtedly mean having to give in elsewhere, and literally supporting the suppression of political dissent.

Are you intentionally ignoring the fact that Google has already had hundreds of employees working full time to build something to assist the Chinese government in suppressing political dissent?

TheResidentSkeptic (profile) says:

The strategy of the game

1) all our users data must be kept in our country on a server in our country
2) since our users data is on a server in our country, you have a nexus of business in our country
3) since you now have a nexus of service in our country, we will tax you 3% of your global revenue (H/T to the EU)

So.. how many countries get to play the tax game before each company goes out of business?

Gets rid of all them foreign companies who won’t comply with the instructions of what information the people are allowed to know, and back to local-only, well-controlled media.

And that’s the real game.

Tanner Andrews (profile) says:

no worries there

seriously consider simply shutting off access in that country

Much simpler solution: have no office in that country. With no office, and presumably a corresponding lack of assets, they are free to ignore any decrees from Vietnam.

Think of it as a message: “I fart in your general direction, which I am allowed to do from here in the States because we have a First Amendment and you all have an unappetizing little dictator.”

Add Your Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here

Comment Options:

Make this the or (get credits or sign in to see balance) what's this?

What's this?

Techdirt community members with Techdirt Credits can spotlight a comment as either the "First Word" or "Last Word" on a particular comment thread. Credits can be purchased at the Techdirt Insider Shop »

Follow Techdirt

Techdirt Daily Newsletter

Techdirt Deals
Techdirt Insider Discord
The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...
Loading...
Older Stuff
09:29 Canadian Court Upholds 'God Given Right' To Give Your Obnoxious Neighbor The Finger (26)
13:37 Appeals Court Says Nope To Florida Governor's 'Stop Woke' Law, Denies Request To Lift Injunction Against It (22)
12:04 Setting 1st Amendment Myths On Fire In A Crowded Theater (157)
09:18 Is Gavin Newsom Attacking Walgreens For Its Choices Different From DeSantis Attacking Disney? (142)
10:48 Fifth Circuit Passes Up Opportunity To Correct Ruling That Said Gov't Retaliation Against Protected Speech Is Fine (9)
12:06 Another Day, Another Blatant Attack On The 1st Amendment From The Florida GOP (125)
09:34 New DeSantis-Endorsed Florida Bill An Outright Attack On The 1st Amendment And Free Speech (106)
09:21 Getting Kicked Off Social Media For Breaking Its Rules Is Nothing Like Being Sent To A Prison Camp For Retweeting Criticism Of A Dictator (243)
05:26 It's Time To Codify The 'NY Times v. Sullivan' Standard Into Law (57)
12:11 Free Speech Absolutist Elon Musk Pulls Down Documentary About India PM Modi (26)
10:43 Appeals Court Judge Suggests Hate Speech Shouldn't Be Protected In Decision Against Students Expelled For Bigoted Social Media Posts (40)
09:30 Saudi Government Narrative Control Efforts Now Include The Jailing Of Wikipedia Administrators (61)
15:36 Court Reminds St. Louis City Council That Blocking Taxpayers On Social Media Violates 1st Amendment (15)
13:28 Yes, Elon Musk Is Fucking Up Twitter; But No, The Government Has No Business Getting Involved (118)
10:50 Congress Is About To Make This Post Telling You When To Celebrate SCOTUS Justice Birthdays Illegal (47)
10:44 Actual Free Speech Matters, Elon Musk's Understanding Of It Puts Free Speech At Risk (210)
12:03 The First Amendment Needs To Protect Everyone (Even Homophobic Web Designers) To Protect Anyone (248)
10:45 First Circuit Trims First Amendment, Upholds New Hampshire's Criminal Defamation Law (10)
12:48 Court Tells Florida Town That Law Forbidding Resident's 'Fuck Trump' Sign Is Unconstitutional (19)
12:26 Iowa City Officials Prove They Aren't Fascists By Arresting An Activist Twice For Calling Them Fascists (13)
09:42 Elon Musk's First Move Is To Fire The Person Most Responsible For Twitter's Strong Free Speech Stance (311)
10:50 Brazil's Governments Amps Up Anti-Free Speech Tactics Ahead Of National Election (12)
12:18 Saudi Arabia Imprisons An American Citizen For 16 Years Over Critical Tweets (22)
15:31 Some Good News: Planet Aid Agrees To Pay $1.9 Million To Settle Its SLAPP Suit Against Reveal News (1)
12:23 Turkey Still Thinks It Hasn't Jailed Enough Journalists, Add Prison Sentences To Its 'Fake News' Law (3)
09:31 John Stossel Loses His Pathetic SLAPP Suit Against Facebook And Fact Checkers (91)
15:53 Vietnamese Government Pushes Plan To Restrict Dissemination Of News Stories By Social Media Platforms (17)
10:43 California Governor Signs Bill Forbidding The Use Of Rap Lyrics As Criminal Evidence (12)
10:45 The Onion Files Hilarious Amicus Brief In An Important Case, And Actually Makes A Key Point In The Best Way Possible (23)
09:31 There Are Real Threats To Free Speech Everywhere. Cancel Culture Is Far Down The List (340)
More arrow