Facebook Bans 'Promotion' Of Kodi Boxes, Even If They're Perfectly Legal
from the somebody-is-clearly-terrified dept
If you haven’t noticed, the entertainment industry has a new, terrifying bogeyman. Over the last year or two, pressure from entertainment industry lobbying groups has resulted in an all-out war on streaming video devices (aka computers) that run Kodi, the video streaming software. Kodi has technically been around since 2002, first as Xbox Media Player, after which it became the Xbox Media Center until 2014. The XBMC Foundation then renamed the software Kodi, and it became popular as an easy way to store and stream content, including copyrighted content, from hardware running Kodi to other devices in or out of the home.
For years now, tinkerers everywhere have built custom-made PCs that use the open-source Kodi platform. In more recent years, outfits like Dragonbox or SetTV have taken things further by selling users tailor-made hardware that provides easy access to live copyrighted content by not only including Kodi, but integrating numerous tools and add-ons that make copyright infringement easier. Driven largely by clearly-terrified entertainment-industry execs and lobbyists, numerous studios, Netflix and Amazon have tried to sue these efforts out of existence.
Even the FCC has tried to help the entertainment industry in this fight, demanding that Ebay and Amazon crack down on the sale of such devices. Since the FCC lacks authority over copyright, it has instead tried to justify its involvement here by focusing on these devices’ illegal use of the FCC approval logo. It’s another big favor to the entertainment industry by the Pai FCC, who you’ll recall killed efforts to help make the traditional cable box sector more open and competitive.
But the fight has also been pushed well beyond “fully loaded” Kodi-embedded devices specifically built and sold with an eye on copyright infringement. Google, for example, has banned the word Kodi from its autocomplete filter despite the fact that the Kodi software is perfectly legal. Facebook has also been piling on, initially updating its commerce policy to ban the promotion of “products or items” that facilitate or encourage unauthorized access to digital media.
Last week, Cordcutter news was the first to notice that Facebook had since tailored its commerce policy further to specifically ban Facebook users from promoting “the sale or use of streaming devices with KODI installed.”:
Facebook hasn’t banned the sale of any devices that are compatible with Kodi-streaming devices (keyboards, remotes). But the specific focus on Kodi remains a problem because, again, Kodi itself isn’t illegal. Nor is building a small custom-PC with Kodi (or any of numerous variants like Plex) installed. Banning users for selling custom PCs that just happen to include software the entertainment industry assumes will be used for piracy is an obnoxious over-reach, but it should make it clear just how terrified the entertainment industry is of such devices.
It’s an age-old story. This “threat” (which again is perfectly-legal hardware running perfectly-legal software) could be countered by offering consumers better, more modifiable, and open products and services. Instead, as we saw with the cable industry’s massive disinformation attack against cable box reform efforts, the goal is always to keep everything unrealistically locked down to the detriment of the right to tinker and consumer choice.
Filed Under: copyright, kodi, kodi boxes
Companies: facebook
Comments on “Facebook Bans 'Promotion' Of Kodi Boxes, Even If They're Perfectly Legal”
Maybe if we had good, reliable services that offered content without fragmentation, with ease of access, no bullshit windows and that could be used offline in conjunction with such apps if the user wanted? I mean, why do they like to leave money on the table that much?
Re: Re:
Because its about power and control, money is a secondary consideration.
So THIS is where Facebook draws the line?
Re: Re:
Fuck facebook
Re: Re: Re:
Not with a rented <insert_device_here>, I got no idea where that’s been and they hang out with a really, really creepy set.
How about OSMC and LibreELEC, are they banned to, or will they slip past the filters?
Re: Re:
Those are just systems that run Kodi. So no, probably not.
perfectly legal?
Are you opposed to Facebook blocking the promotion of other items? Should they open the doors to the legal sales of firearms on their platform?
Also, I think it’s worth mentioning that it’s perfectly legal for Facebook to create bans like this. You wouldn’t want to interfere in their legal activities now, would you?
Re: perfectly legal?
Oh look, a predictably dumb straw man.
Re: Re: perfectly legal?
It’s not a strawman at all. If you object to Facebook banning one type of legal merchandise but not another, then you are simply a hipocrite. You are happy to be subjected to “Zucks’ Law” so long as it suits you.
You are happy to embrace corporate Fascism so long as the flavor that suits you.
Re: Re: Re: perfectly legal?
Please cite where anybody actually said what you are claiming they think, apart from you and the anonymous moron. If you can’t then, by definition, it is a strawman.
Re: perfectly legal?
And it is perfectly legal for us to point out the absurdity of those bans.
Re: perfectly legal?
I doubt anyone here is upset about the proposed blocking of Kodi items, rather it is the hypocrisy that drives one mad.
The lies, the deceit, and the outright in your face bullshit – this is why people complain about this crap. Apparently you think it is just fine and welcome more of the same.
Re: perfectly legal?
“Should they open the doors to the legal sales of firearms on their platform?”
You mean like walmart?
Sure no problem if that’s the road they choose. As long as they follow state and federal laws I see no problem.
“it’s perfectly legal for Facebook to create bans like this.”
Absolutely. Also stupid. Which was the point.
“You wouldn’t want to interfere in their legal activities now, would you?”
If only you were as smart as you think you are.
Re: perfectly legal?
No
Yes if they do it legally
No
You’re welcome
Re: perfectly legal?
Discussions of legality and discussions of morality/ethics are not the same thing. If Techdirt comments on the moral/ethical issues of this ban (what they do here), they are not commenting on the legal status.
They often comment on the legal status when there is a lawsuit or public response trying to push back against actions with a rally about “Free Speech” to respond to that push back, and often comment on moral grounds when moral panics or ethical panics or corporatist pressure is behind the activity being discussed.
Re: perfectly legal?
Go home, Ajit, you’re drunk.
“Google, for example, has banned the word Kodi from its autocomplete filter”
This is stupid even if Kodi were illegal.
What’s next, Google is going to block other words it does not like? How about blocking the word murder, it is a horrific thing so why allow people to search on it? This is ridiculous.
Re: Re:
Future Onion Headline: Google Blocks the Word ‘Moist’ from Autocomplete Results After Mailroom Guy Says He Hates It
Re: Re: Re:
LOL
On a side note, The Onion is having difficulties creating satirical pieces due to the totally insane world in which we now reside.
Re: Re: Re: Re:
Living as a satire writer in the Clown Timeline must be an exercise in futility at best. Their staff is probably starting to feel like Cartman getting ‘Simpsons did it!’ yelled at him.
Re: Re: Re:
I was tempted to flag your comment for using the ‘M’ word. 🙂
Re: Re: Re:
Moisturizing cream producers scream in panic!
Re: Re: Re: Re:
Hydrating. The word is hydrating. Also firming and toning. Possibly exfoliating or some other properties specific to intended use cases. But it’s “hydrating”. Which is sexy and sciencey.
Re: Re: Re:2 Re:
It depends on where you apply, no? shows self out
Re: Re:
Anyone remember when Google was actually a good search engine? It’s been a while.
Re: Re: Re:
Was it? Possibly better than some, and better at some times more than others, but was it good?
Re: Re: Re: Re:
If you remember the days of Yahoo, Lycos and Altavista before they came along, yes it absolutely was.
Remeber
Brains “facilitate [..] unauthorized access to digital media”
Couldn’t this be considered Tortious interference interference of Kodi’s business and result in a lawsuit?
Re: Re:
No, because Team Kodi aren’t the people who are selling those computers, they’re just the developers who make the free/open-source media software that they run.
(Honest people who sell computers with Kodi preinstalled on them are clear and upfront about this distinction. Dishonest people are not.)
Re: Re: Re:
And this is another use of piracy to try and prevent a real problem, that of cable cutting which Kodi makes easy to do.
Re: Re: Re: Re:
“And this is another use of piracy to try and prevent a real problem, that of cable cutting which Kodi makes easy to do.”
Cable cutting is only a problem for the cable companies, not their prior customers nor anyone else who does not use their service. Many cut the cable and simply use ota, damned pirates – stealing over the air video.
Re: Re: Re: Re:
I use Kodi/LibreElec/Raspberry Pi, and I don’t use any of the addons the anti-piracy folks complain about. I use it to play my video/audio collection. So Kodi is not necessarily synonymous with piracy.
Re: Re: Re:2 Traditional TV
I use Kodi to watch traditional TV!
To the best of my knowledge, Kodi is the only viable application to use as a frontend with MythTV as a backend. MythTV’s own frontend is clunky and out of date. It’s a coding example of how you could build a frontend, not something anyone would want to use.
Re: Re: Re:2 Re:
That was my point, but piracy is the excuse that the entertainment industry uses to go after anything that competes with their money streams.
Good job, billionaires
So we will buy our Kodi devices from the smaller online stores. If others accept Paypal who cares about Facebook Marketplace anyway.
Plenty of piracy on eBay that I have seen (Microsoft software license keys “come here and collect the broken motherboard this key is tired to if you want it”, etc).
Re: Good job, billionaires
why buy a kodi device from anyone?. learn to do it yourself and the entire issue goes away.
When was the last time you went to a theater to watch a movie? Did you spend a week’s worth of pay to take your family? Bring the prices down and this becomes a non factor. Pay per view is the same. Who wants to pay $60 to watch 2 mins of the feature bout. Get it right and this problem goes away.
Re: Hyperbole doesn't make a bad argument better.
Re: Re: Hyperbole doesn't make a bad argument better.
Hyperbole also doesn’t make his argument wrong. High prices are the major argument for not seeing movies theatrically apart from the major tentpole movies, which is why so many mid range films are tending to go straight to streaming.
Re: Re: Re: Hyperbole doesn't make a bad argument better.
The reason I don’t go to movies in the theaters is because I cannot pause, rewind, get more tea, make a snack, go to the bathroom, look something up on my phone, etc. The price is inconsequential.
It’s the DVR all over again!
Maybe if the cable companies was as good as adelphia cable and
Maybe if the cable companies was like it was when Adelphia cable was around and didn’t lie and say u couldn’t get 2 threw 99 with out a cable box when u can and so on maybe people wouldn’t do thay adelphia canle and the analog landline are the best analog landline if u have a corded phine and power goes out I still have a phone power goes out all the time and I still have a phone because of it
Re: Maybe if the cable companies was as good as adelphia cable and
That sentence lacks more structural support than the Sampoong Department Store. A bit of punctuation goes a long way to ensure your words don’t just collapse into an unrecognizable heap of debris.
Isn't this total fodder for a whack-a-mole situation
When the [1994 assault weapons ban] came out with a list of components that make an assault weapon, gun developers got right on the task of making alternative devices that did not, according to the legal descriptions qualify as that specific component. Pistol-style foregrips, for example, were replaced with a weird looking handle with a thumb-hole that worked close enough.
This looks like a thing where KODI can be replaced with any other software that does exactly the same thing, even if the code is identical to KODI except for enough aesthetic changes to make it not KODI.
Still, these are people and industries that are happy to pirate for their own uses, even while they try to hunt those that pirate their own IP, so it’s hard to take them seriously as having a legitimate gripe.
Re: Isn't this total fodder for a whack-a-mole situation
Crap. I forgot to add the link regarding the 1994 assault weapons ban.
Always, always, always preview.
Re: Re: Isn't this total fodder for a whack-a-mole situation
DId you ever see the documentaries about Gorillas where they have two gorillas play a game, and the one that wins get a prize? Gorillas understand the rules very quickly, and have incredibly fast reaction times, much faster than humans. When someone changes the rules on them, they go crazy, literally, screaming and yelling, pounding their chest, flinging their excrement, the whole 9 yards.
You have 2 consecutive posts. Bad gorilla. Flag and censor immediately, please.
Re: Re: Re: Failure to parse.
Anonymous Coward I’m really trying to give you the benefit of the doubt by assuming your gorilla story has something to do with Facebook or KODI and / or the topic above.
And failing.
Should I move on and assume you are malicious or ignorant?
Perhaps you should elaborate and clarify your intent.
Sounds familiar
Didn’t they try to spread the same sort of confusion over VCRs legality in the past too despite there being literally no reason why the hardware would be illegal and only succeeded in making it explicitly so? And it took until after that for the terminal dumbasses realized that if people are buying the then expensive tapes for over the air content they could start selling their media backlog to consumers them with signals that started out perfectly crisp instead of starting with the distortion of the broadcast plus the recording distortion?
Kodi
The deepstate dosen’t like that Hollyweird is not rolling in the money which is used to hide that most of them are pedophiles.
Re: Kodi
They are catholic?
Re: Kodi
I used to like to get really high too.
Nobody need Kodi
Re: Re:
For a Netflix like interface to my own videos, yes I do.
Re: That stupid "need" argument.
Need is irrelevant. We don’t need stupid whiny bitches but here you are.
Re: Re:
Nobody needs Facebook.
Awesome!
Now that they have less opportunities to use that piece of shit Kodi, perhaps more people will use and contribute to MythTV.
XBMC was an ambitious project, but shortly before they started calling it Kodi was when everything turned to shit. They abandoned their hacker roots, got greedy, tried to “go legit”, changed the project’s name to something you’d call a cat, and then fell right on their asses. Ha and ha.
Re: Awesome!
That’s funny because XBMC was always a MUCH better media player. The media playback features in MythTV always seemed like an ugly red headed stepchild with even some of the major contributors copping the “Apple attitude” with regards to us power users.
Facebook bans kodi
I cannot believe it. Facebook has very serious issues on the subject foreign influences using the Facebook platform to
Negatively influence american politics.
And just how is the Facebook ban on kodi going stop the flow of information of kodi on the internet or on Facebook anyway.
The devices, the app and it’s spinoffs.
Long live Open Source. Let’s build our own Facebook.
.
Re: Facebook bans kodi
Been thinking about that since the shadow banning and outright banning became public. All you need to do is create a copy of Disqus that allows people to save locally (so no one can ban you), as well as to the cloud, and allows the article to be included above the comment section. It needs a little work but it is a beginning.
Re: Re: Facebook bans kodi
A Mastodon instance, anyone?
No such thing as a kodi box
no such thing as a kodi box
kodi is simply a media application you can run on your pc, apple ,or android device.
ignorance of the technology is why there is a problem in the first place
Re: No such thing as a kodi box
I disagree: a kodi box is one Dedicated exclusively to Kodi.
Might not be hard to jailbreak, but that was how it was delivered.
B
Free
Everything on the air is becoming a way of make my money, what a ridiculous attitude when the initial idea and promotion of the INTERNET, was a free way of communicating with in , all the great ideas are part of a government that wants more to be richer and limit is to nothing.
pssst calm down. There are one or two websites out there still selling them. But don’t tell anyone ’cause it’s a secret.
Facebook is crap and always has been. Only mindless idiots use it to sell anything or expose their private lives to the world of pervs, theives, scammers, spammers and the government. No limit to human stupidity.
In retaliation for the ban, Kodi bans Facebook.
How about
How about blocking the word murder, it is a horrific thing so why allow people to search on it? This is ridiculous.
Re: Associated with mystery fiction.
Agatha Christie enthusiasts would have a meltdown. And every last one of them knows how to kill people in creative ways.