Judge Tosses Charges Against Journalist Who Published Docs Leaked To Her By A Police Officer

from the PD-promises-to-pursue-one-of-its-own-with-same-vigor,-said-zero-officials dept

A police department’s retaliatory arrest of a citizen journalist has dead-ended with a courtroom loss. Priscilla Villarreal — better known as “Lagordiloca” to her thousands of Facebook fans — was arrested after she published information given to her by police officer Barbara Goodman. The info included the name of Border Patrol agent who had committed suicide — info never officially released by the Border Patrol.

While the proper target for Texas prosecutors would have been the officer leaking sensitive info, they decided to pursue Villarreal instead, issuing an arrest warrant for “misuse of official information.” Publishing leaks has never really troubled the courts before, usually falling well within the confines of the First Amendment. But prosecutors argued the “misuse” occurred when Villarreal “profited” from it by “gaining popularity” with her exclusive leak.

“Lagordiloca” operated outside the mainstream, publishing and streaming interactions with officers live to her Facebook page. It’s apparent many officers didn’t care for her reporting, and this misuse of a “misuse” law seemed like a quick and dirty way to shut her up. It didn’t work. As Jason Buch reports for the San Antonio Express-News, a judge has tossed the charges against Villareal, finding them unconstitutional.

A judge in Laredo on Wednesday threw out the charges against the social media personality known as La Gordiloca.

State District Judge Monica Z. Notzon ruled that part of the law police used to arrest Priscilla Villarreal is unconstitutionally vague.

The judge didn’t go so far as to find the publication of leaked info protected under the First Amendment, however. This means prosecutors can still go after journalists for publishing “sensitive” info. But it probably wouldn’t be prudent to do so. The law itself has been ruled unconstitutional, meaning it will need a rewrite before it can be pressed into service to silence critics of the government. No injunction has been issued, which means it’s still technically legal to arrest journalists for leaks, even if a dismissal is all but guaranteed. This narrow ruling doesn’t exactly discourage retaliatory arrests.

The District Attorney is choosing not to appeal this decision, but still believes his office was justified in approving the arrest warrant for the Laredo PD.

“We believe that the law was there, was on our side. We applied the law that was in the books,” Alaniz said. “The court determined it was vague and unconstitutional, and we’re making the decision not to appeal.

This is the DA granting the arresting officers the good faith exception — based on his own terrible interpretation of the law — presumably in hopes the judge presiding over the inevitable civil rights lawsuit will feel the same way. The DA has nothing to worry about. His immunity is pretty much unpierceable, no matter how much he twists state law to aid officers in retaliatory harassment of local journalists.

And there’s always a chance the state’s Attorney General may issue an appeal of its own. AG Ken Paxton recently declared Texas police officers are entitled to all available footage of use of force incidents before being questioned by investigators, so he may feel inclined to attempt to erect another buffer between officers and public accountability with an appeal.

Filed Under: , , , , , , ,

Rate this comment as insightful
Rate this comment as funny
You have rated this comment as insightful
You have rated this comment as funny
Flag this comment as abusive/trolling/spam
You have flagged this comment
The first word has already been claimed
The last word has already been claimed
Insightful Lightbulb icon Funny Laughing icon Abusive/trolling/spam Flag icon Insightful badge Lightbulb icon Funny badge Laughing icon Comments icon

Comments on “Judge Tosses Charges Against Journalist Who Published Docs Leaked To Her By A Police Officer”

Subscribe: RSS Leave a comment
15 Comments
Anonymous Coward says:

Re: Re: Re:

No but the press can and does regularly ruin reputations whether it’s warranted or not. This is why being tried in the press is a Thing.

Try to find a job when everyone just “knows” you did it regardless of any evidence or actual conviction thanks to media coverage and talking heads saying, without ever coming out and saying it, you’re guilty.

Anonymous Anonymous Coward (profile) says:

Double Good Speak

The police are in fact also citizens. I see no reasonable (problematic word there) reason why they should get deferential treatment. They do a job. The job has rules. They should follow not only those rules, but the law. That their job entails the enforcement of law, they should also know the law.

All this remonstrating (from their unions, the prosecutors, and the courts) about how they should be protected from doing their jobs…properly…sure seems like they are being set up to be enforcers, rather than law enforcers.

Enforcers have some tendency to enforce what they feel like enforcing, rather than what the rest of us expect them to enforce, that is, when we hired them.

Anonymous Coward says:

"unpierceable" prosecutorial immunity

Tim’s assertion that “the DA has nothing to worry about” because prosecutorial immunity is “pretty much unpierceable” may have forgotten about North Carolina district attorney Mike Nifong, who was disbarred and jailed for his malevolent prosecution of the Duke lacrosse team rape case.

While an extremely rare resolution to the extremely common problem of prosecutorial misconduct, it demonstrated that DAs, like cops, are not necessarily 100% immune from the law.

Anonymous Coward says:

London Times: Police are trained to hide vital evidence

April 3 2018 – “The scale of the failure by police and prosecutors to disclose vital evidence in criminal cases is exposed today in documents showing that such behaviour is routine and deliberate. A dossier seen by The Times reveals a commonly held view that the defence is not entitled to see all the evidence. It discloses the tactics used to stop it being handed over, with officers in at least one force apparently trained in how to avoid making available material that might undermine their case.”

https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/police-are-trained-to-hide-vital-evidence-cnfdbm6jz?shareToken=795c8f48bfb868d3fb3c9b205778bd77

Leave a Reply to Agammamon Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here

Comment Options:

Make this the or (get credits or sign in to see balance) what's this?

What's this?

Techdirt community members with Techdirt Credits can spotlight a comment as either the "First Word" or "Last Word" on a particular comment thread. Credits can be purchased at the Techdirt Insider Shop »

Follow Techdirt

Techdirt Daily Newsletter

Techdirt Deals
Techdirt Insider Discord
The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...
Loading...