Court Says German Intelligence Agency Can No Longer Hoard Billions Of Metadata Records

from the collect?-possibly.-dig-through?-no. dept

A two-year legal battle of German intelligence agency metadata collections has ended. And the German Federal Intelligence (BND) agency has lost.

Germany’s foreign intelligence agency (BND) must not store the metadata – such as phone numbers – of international phone calls for the purpose of intelligence analysis, a court rules on Thursday.

[…]

Media freedom organization Reporters Without Borders filed a lawsuit in June 2015 against the BND, saying it had breached the organization’s secrecy and harmed the partners and reporters it worked with.

This is a big decision — somewhat on par with the revamp of the Section 215 metadata program here in the US that took place following the Snowden leaks. But it might be bigger than that. BND collects over 11 billion records every year. And it shares this haul with the NSA and GCHQ.

This was revealed via documents leaked to German news agency Die Zeit. The BND was grabbing metadata at a rate of 220 million records per day. This is only a small part of the BND’s haul, much of which appears to be harvested from internet cables and satellite transmissions.

These revelations caused some problems for the German government, which has generally been careful to keep Stasi comparisons to a minimum. The BND claimed these collections were lawful, but top government officials weren’t so sure. This lawsuit appears to have settled the “metadata” question at least.

The end of this legal battle bears some resemblance to Section 215 v. 2.0 here in the US. The Reuters report says the BND will no longer be able to “store” metadata records for intelligence analysis. There appears to be no restraint on collecting records, which likely means the BND will need to approach companies directly to obtain metadata. This means some semblance of targeting will be shoehorned into the BND’s collection system and that metadata interception (in bulk) from internet cables is no longer an option.

It’s a small win but it’s a good one. And I’m sure it surprised the hell out of the intelligence agency. But thanks to Ed Snowden and other leakers, bulk surveillance — especially the kind that sweeps up domestic data — is no longer acceptable.

Filed Under: , , ,

Rate this comment as insightful
Rate this comment as funny
You have rated this comment as insightful
You have rated this comment as funny
Flag this comment as abusive/trolling/spam
You have flagged this comment
The first word has already been claimed
The last word has already been claimed
Insightful Lightbulb icon Funny Laughing icon Abusive/trolling/spam Flag icon Insightful badge Lightbulb icon Funny badge Laughing icon Comments icon

Comments on “Court Says German Intelligence Agency Can No Longer Hoard Billions Of Metadata Records”

Subscribe: RSS Leave a comment
8 Comments
Anonymous Coward says:

“BND collects over 11 billion records every year. And it shares this haul with the NSA and GCHQ.”

Does this mean that specific information is available upon request, or that a massive stream of German-collected data is “stovepiped” directly to NSA storage facilities, in a kind of end-run around FISA restrictions?

This is said to be one of the biggest loopholes of FISA, which prohibits US spy agencies from conducting domestic mass-surveillance themselves, but does not restrict them from accepting “wiretapped” data on US citizens collected by overseas spy agencies.

Anonymous Coward says:

Re: Re:

Does this mean that specific information is available upon request, or that a massive stream of German-collected data is "stovepiped" directly to NSA storage facilities, in a kind of end-run around FISA restrictions?

If the latter, that would be a major loophole to this ruling wouldn’t it? Sure, the BND can’t store the data, but if they funnel it to the NSA what does it matter?

What’s the general feeling on whether the BND will actually comply, or just redefine their way around it like the NSA? Their BND’s statement that they "would wait for the verdict’s legal justification to be evaluated" doesn’t fill me with hope. I mean, didn’t the court just evaluate that for them?

Leave a Reply to Anonymous Coward Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here

Comment Options:

Make this the or (get credits or sign in to see balance) what's this?

What's this?

Techdirt community members with Techdirt Credits can spotlight a comment as either the "First Word" or "Last Word" on a particular comment thread. Credits can be purchased at the Techdirt Insider Shop »

Follow Techdirt

Techdirt Daily Newsletter

Techdirt Deals
Techdirt Insider Discord
The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...
Loading...