Russian Bank Sends Legal Threats To Researcher Who Revealed Spike In Traffic Supposedly Tied To Trump's Server

from the is-the-wrong-message-worth-shooting-the-messenger-over? dept

Late last year, a security researcher noticed what was believed to be an unusual amount of network traffic between Donald Trump’s server and a Russian bank. A lot of bad reporting followed — some it aided by the security researcher’s conclusions — which attempted to tie some spikes in spam to Trump’s supposed collusion with the Russians.

It was a conspiracy theory borne of a researcher’s belief something was happening, even when further research by others showed it to be a whole lot of nothing. At this point, only the die hard conspiracy theorists are still holding onto this spike in traffic between a Trump server and a Russian bank as evidence of anything.

Now, there’s an additional wrinkle. The FBI is investigating possible connections between Trump and Russia that may have played a part in the election. Nothing has been confirmed by the FBI. As for the spike in network traffic noticed by the researcher, it can still be chalked up to the most boring of non-conspiracy theories: spammers using the same domain name server as both Trump’s server and a Russian bank to spam recipients with hotel-related email.

The other party that can’t let go of this conspiracy theory is the Russian bank’s lawyers. CyberScoop reports Alfa Bank’s lawyers have issued legal threats to a security researcher behind the Trump-Russia story.

In a document obtained by CyberScoop, Alfa Bank notified Indiana University computer researcher L. Jean Camp that it’s pursuing “all available options” after Camp’s research suggested the bank engaged in some form of communication with the Trump Organization. Washington-based law firm Kirkland & Ellis sent the letter on the bank’s behalf on March 17.

Alfa Bank is considering, among other things, using one of our nation’s most easily-abused laws to pursue legal action against Camp for “promoting an unwarranted investigation” into the bank’s ties to Donald Trump. The CFAA is cited as one route the bank may take towards making Camp pay for besmirching the reputation of the Russian bank. It also demands [PDF] she retain records possibly needed in upcoming litigation, including those detailed in this memorable sentence:

communications between you and the individuals you have publicly identified as a “loose group of concerned nerds” with whom you reportedly worked in concert regarding this matter

Being a security researcher is dangerous enough, even when you’re 100% in the right. Legal threats tend to follow news of security breaches or unpatched exploits. When you follow the wrong conclusion because you’re so sure you’re right, you make things worse. The CFAA is a blunt weapon with surprising flexibility, and all the data researchers normally avail themselves of without issue can be twisted into “unauthorized access” by a complainant with sufficient motivation.

Filed Under: , , , , ,
Companies: alfa bank

Rate this comment as insightful
Rate this comment as funny
You have rated this comment as insightful
You have rated this comment as funny
Flag this comment as abusive/trolling/spam
You have flagged this comment
The first word has already been claimed
The last word has already been claimed
Insightful Lightbulb icon Funny Laughing icon Abusive/trolling/spam Flag icon Insightful badge Lightbulb icon Funny badge Laughing icon Comments icon

Comments on “Russian Bank Sends Legal Threats To Researcher Who Revealed Spike In Traffic Supposedly Tied To Trump's Server”

Subscribe: RSS Leave a comment
10 Comments
Anonymous Coward says:

Re: Re:

Sure, Clinton’s email server contains no evidence of hacking (though it is pretty likely), and the DNC was definitely hacked by a foreign government. We know these things because of investigations that looked into these issues.

What justification do you have for opposing an investigation? If there’s nothing there, Trump will be vindicated. If there is evidence there, we can stamp out the traitors colluding with the Russian government, or laundering Russian money, or whatever it is that the investigation finds.

Cowardly Lion says:

A bit light in the gravitas department...

Surely if Kirkland and Ellis LLP were serious they would have gone to a judge first, and asked for a court order against L. Jean Camp to preserve said evidence?

Most sensible legal jurisdictions do not delegate any meaningful authority to law firms, or any other firm for that matter, to be able to compel individuals to do anything.

Add Your Comment

Your email address will not be published.

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here

Comment Options:

Make this the or (get credits or sign in to see balance) what's this?

What's this?

Techdirt community members with Techdirt Credits can spotlight a comment as either the "First Word" or "Last Word" on a particular comment thread. Credits can be purchased at the Techdirt Insider Shop »

Follow Techdirt

Techdirt Daily Newsletter

Techdirt Deals
Techdirt Insider Discord
The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...
Loading...