Another 'Terrorist' Swept Up By The FBI, Which Had To Purchase $20 Of 'Terrorist' Supplies To Keep The 'Plan' In Motion

from the and-threatened-his-family,-which-is-a-nice-use-of-gov't-resources dept

Perhaps no entity generates more fake news than the FBI’s counterterrorism unit. Several times a year, a press release is issued announcing the bust of a so-called terrorist. Almost invariably, the “terrorist” has been handcrafted through the relentless intercession of undercover FBI agents.

Here’s how the DOJ website describes its latest self-crafted anti-terrorism coup:

Robert Lorenzo Hester, Jr., 25, of Columbia, Missouri, was charged in a criminal complaint with attempting to provide material support to the Islamic State of Iraq and al-Sham (ISIS), a designated foreign terrorist organization. Hester was charged in federal court based on his role in making preparations to launch a terrorist attack with persons he believed were associated with ISIS, who were actually undercover law enforcement personnel.

And here are the far more mundane and sad details behind the official statement, as provided by Murtaza Hussain of The Intercept.

Robert Lorenzo Hester of Columbia, Missouri, didn’t have the $20 he needed to buy the 9-volt batteries, duct tape, and roofing nails his new FBI friends wanted him to get, so they gave him the money. The agents noted in a criminal complaint that Hester, who at one point brought his two small children to a meeting because he didn’t have child care, continued smoking marijuana despite professing to be a devout Muslim.

This is the supposed terrorist who would have killed hundreds of people on President’s Day if the FBI hadn’t stepped in to intervene. But the FBI’s “intervention” looks suspiciously like “encouragement…” or “entrapment.”

[T]he only contact Hester had with ISIS was with the two undercover agents who suggested to him that they had connections with the group. The agents, who were in contact with him for five months, provided him with money and rides home from work as he dealt with the personal fallout of an unrelated arrest stemming from an altercation at a local grocery store.

Undercover agents began working with/on Hester shortly after this arrest. Seizing on his anti-government social media posts [good lord], the agents told Hester they could put him in touch with someone with direct terrorist connections. This “direct connection” was just another FBI agent. It was the FBI that suggested acquiring weapons. And it was the FBI who chose to take Hester seriously, despite his nonexistent terrorist group (“the Lion Guard”) sporting a name that had been pulled from a cartoon his children watched.

It was also an FBI agent who suggested that even thinking about planning a terrorist attack was an irrevocable act — and that entertaining second thoughts about committing acts of violence would be rewarded with acts of violence.

The agent cautioned Hester that once he decided to proceed there was “no turning back.” He also told Hester that under no circumstances was he to do conduct any sort of operation on his own. The agent, referred to in the complaint as UC-2, then “threatened to come back and find HESTER if he learned that HESTER reneged on the promise. For emphasis, and for the purpose of mitigating the security threat posed by HESTER, UC-2 displayed a knife and reminded HESTER that UC-2 knew where HESTER and his family lived, among other forceful words.”

After threatening his family, FBI agents continued to push Hester forward with “his” plan to commit an act of terrorism. His plans required $20 worth of supplies… which Hester couldn’t afford. But Hester did promise to be more materially-supportive in the near future:

Hester promised that he would help buy ammunition for the weapons once he had received the money from his tax refund.

A lot of the FBI’s standard counterterrorism M.O. is on display here. The agency prefers to work with people in desperate or dire circumstances — people who don’t have the financial independence or mental toughness needed to create and carry out plans on their own. And when they get cold feet, agents apparently suggest their dire circumstances will be made even worse. The end result is the government congratulating itself for rounding up “terrorists” that likely never would have gone beyond anti-government Facebook posts if they’d been left alone. And for the few who appear capable of committing violent acts, the government pushes these people towards extremism rather than attempt to pull them back from this precipice.

Filed Under: , , , ,

Rate this comment as insightful
Rate this comment as funny
You have rated this comment as insightful
You have rated this comment as funny
Flag this comment as abusive/trolling/spam
You have flagged this comment
The first word has already been claimed
The last word has already been claimed
Insightful Lightbulb icon Funny Laughing icon Abusive/trolling/spam Flag icon Insightful badge Lightbulb icon Funny badge Laughing icon Comments icon

Comments on “Another 'Terrorist' Swept Up By The FBI, Which Had To Purchase $20 Of 'Terrorist' Supplies To Keep The 'Plan' In Motion”

Subscribe: RSS Leave a comment
Jordan Chandler (profile) says:


Apparently they gave him a chance to back out. He clearly wanted to do harm. I don’t abide these types of stings, but the man clearly has issues, clearly is ready to use violence, and if not today, maybe tomorrow.

ALso shows that asking peopel about their neighbors is a huge waste of time. “Ohhh he was always such a nice boy until we found his dad’s head in the freezer”

Anonymous Coward says:

Re: Re: hmmm

  • Its easy to rant online about wanting to kill people a lot harder to actually be willing and able to do it.*

Likewise, it’s easy to aspire to chaos and destruction and violent overthrow of the system when you are literally on the bottom of it- the moment you actually have, say, $20 you could spend on the task, "I could do violence" is now actively competing with "Or I could have a slightly better life".

I don’t think it’s a difficult to say that the former is much more attractive when it isn’t competing with anything.

Machin Shin (profile) says:

Re: Re: hmmm

“Thinking/talking about doing harm and having the will and ability to do it are totally different things.”

For someone who “continued smoking marijuana despite professing to be a devout Muslim.” I’m guessing that having the will do do much of anything more than hunt down a bag of potato chips was probably asking a lot of him.

Uriel-238 (profile) says:

Re: Re: Re: Informing on the plants

We may not actually hear about it, especially if the terrorists pull rank on the local precinct officers.

What I’d expect to happen is that the FBI would send more undercover agents as the police officers and they’d continue to try to trick the target into threatening national security.

Some of the previous stories got pretty gaslighty, where the victim was worked on until he cut off his real friends in favor of his fake ones.

That One Guy (profile) says:

Re: Re: Re: hmmm

I’ll preface this by stating that I can’t seem to find the article that covered it, so the details might be off, but the closest I can think of was a case a few years back where either the FBI or another group sent someone to play ‘terrorist recruiter’ in a mosque in the US, the people there got suspicious and tried to report the agent, only to have pressure brought to bear on them in an attempt to turn them into unwilling informants.

Like I said though, I can’t find the article so the details might be somewhat off, though trying to force people to become informants and punishing those that refuse is S.O.P. for the FBI, so it’s likely to be fairly close.

David says:

Re: hmmm

ALso shows that asking peopel about their neighbors is a huge waste of time. "Ohhh he was always such a nice boy until we found his dad’s head in the freezer"

More like "Ohhh he was always such a nice boy until we explained to him that his dad was evil incarnate and convinced him to cut off his head with the knife we gave him and put it in the freezer".

Anonymous Coward says:

Re: Imagine if...

Law enforcement officers – even in the federal branches – know that putting an end to crime means putting an end to their jobs. They also know that a lack of “results” will make their superiors unhappy.

If they have to invent crimes to get “results”, they will. If they have to convince otherwise innocent people to come within a hair’s width of committing violence just to arrest those people and claim they were “radicalized terrorists”, they will. Nothing is more important to LEOs than “getting results”, even if those results come at the expense of people who would have committed no crimes if not for the cajoling of undercover agents of the state.

That Anonymous Coward (profile) says:

We really really need to demand they stop doing these stunts. They make us less safe by adding more fuel to the fire of they are profiling people. If we have to provide the $20 to make the case, there never was a case. If we have to threaten someone with a knife to stay with us OR ELSE…
I revisit my previous comment about needing someone to investigate this terrorist organization call “F.B.I.” they have launched more plots against the US than any other terrorist organization.

We should get some department to look into these terrorists known as the ‘FBI’. They create terrorist ‘plots’ to influence & frighten the public. They target individuals whom they can sway, by feeding them false information to get them to take the blame for the actions of the ‘FBI’.

They are working to undermine the freedoms of our homeland, using our own money & systems against us. This type of terrorism should be stopped. It is shameful that out leaders blindly supported these supposed allies who have created numerous plots we are aware of and quite possibly dozens more they hide from view, to maintain our financial and legal support while tearing the country apart.

Our leadership is willing to turn a blind eye to these events, hoping to score political capital at the expense of the safety & well being of citizens. What kind of monsters would risk the safety of the country they pledged to protect, to get good soundbites while ignoring real threats to further a political agenda.

Sunhawk says:

IANAL, but I suspect that if I were defending this guy, I’d definitely bring up the “threaten my client with a knife” in the context of “my client almost certainly felt coerced into continuing at this point”.

Among other problems.

How many man-hours were spent on this one? To be honest, the only *actual* benefit of cases like this that I can see is that it might make people distrust those claiming to be able to hook them up with terrorist groups or encouraging them to commit crimes.

But, on the other hand, so far it looks like the only people caught up in this kind of trap are pretty… err… well, not the most *skeptical* of people, shall we say?

Chuck says:

Where are the "second amendment advocates" now?

I was just thinking the other day after Trump’s Muslim ban first went through “where are all those tea party nuts with their AR-15’s when they could actually do something good?” All they would’ve had to do was organize a dozen of them, walk peacefully into the airports, walk right up to the TSA and say “you are detaining people who have every right to enter our country without legal right or warrant. We are here to escort them out of the airport peacefully. If you try to stop us, we will stop you.” Sure, you’d have a mexican standoff for a few seconds, but this is the TSA we’re talking about. NONE of those agents are going to take part in a gunfight.

And here again. Why don’t these “second amendment advocates” form a group, walk into whatever FBI field office this poor sod is being held in, and demand his release or else?

Where are these “second amendment advocates” when their gun-toting could be used to ACTUALLY DEFEND SOMEONE?!

Oh right, they’re protesting Obamacare in front of the Lincoln Memorial again…

Wendy Cockcroft (user link) says:

Re: Re: Re: Where are the "second amendment advocates" now?

AGAIN with this?

Read, laugh, cry…

…then consider peaceful campaigning as an option for effecting regime change. Protip: if you can’t find people to get on board with you, you’re either barking up the wrong tree or too damn fussy about who you campaign with. Open your mind. You don’t have to agree with your fellow campaigners all the time to work effectively with them.

Uriel-238 (profile) says:

Re: Re: Re:2 Violent protest.

I do sometimes have fantasies about sabotage campaigns.

When the police departments were being coy about cellphone spoofing technology, I thought it would be interesting to topple their fake towers, since they couldn’t say publicly what they were and why they were needed.

Still, one has to be super careful to avoid causing injury.

Maybe this is why hacktivism is in vogue.

Chuck says:

Re: Re: Where are the "second amendment advocates" now?

I’m not calling for violence. I was making a point.

Whenever it’s paying a 2 cent tax on their cigarettes to help combat the effects of second hand smoke, or someone telling the coal companies that pollute their very own drinking water that they have to spend a few extra dollars to bury their toxic coal dust in a manner that doesn’t pollute the ground water, these “second amendment advocates” are all over that, showing up to protest with assault rifles and live ammo (though usually they do have good enough sense to keep the weapons unloaded. Usually.)

But when it comes to, oh I don’t know, ACTUALLY DEFENDING THE CONSTITUTION, they’re nowhere to be found.

The joke, in case you’re not getting it, is that these “second amendment advocates” are all too happy to “adovcate” their one little amendment when it’s in their favor. They fail to understand, though, that a true defender of the constitution would show up even when they don’t agree with how the constitution affects them. A TRUE patriot and a TRUE defender of liberty would show up at abortion clinics and protect the women there from harm, rather than threatening them with eternal hell, EVEN IF they are personally opposed to abortion, because THAT’S what the constitution is all about.

I just wish I didn’t have to explain this. -_-

Nick (profile) says:

“The agents, who were in contact with him for five months, provided him with money and rides home from work as he dealt with the personal fallout of an unrelated arrest stemming from an altercation at a local grocery store.”

This may sound strange, but can we devote more FBI resources to basic neighborhood care, such as rides to/from work for ex-cons and financial support? Perhaps if we did that more, people in this country wouldn’t feel that a one-way ticket to martyr town is their only choice.

Andy says:


The moment they threatened him and his family with a knife and violence is the moment that this man should be found innocent. Every single American knows that if they are ever caught up in something illegal not to phone the police or fbi or anyone else as has been shown many times they end up as part of the accused. look at the poor guy who was demonised by the police when he reported something suspicious at the olympics and was then accused of being part of the plot for many years.

Personanongrata says:

The Ends Jusitify the Budget

The end result is the government congratulating itself for rounding up "terrorists" that likely never would have gone beyond anti-government Facebook posts if they’d been left alone.

The end result is unfortunately a bit more convoluted than a simple pat on the back for the government.

In shoveling this steaming pile of horse cocky terror tale to it’s stenographers in the media to transcribe verbatim and disseminate widely the US government is able to paint a fearful vista of terrorists under every rock that aids in justifying it’s odious attacks on the Constitution and the ever increasing amount of finite tax dollars it squanders on these dubious entrapment schemes.

Add Your Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here

Comment Options:

Make this the or (get credits or sign in to see balance) what's this?

What's this?

Techdirt community members with Techdirt Credits can spotlight a comment as either the "First Word" or "Last Word" on a particular comment thread. Credits can be purchased at the Techdirt Insider Shop »

Follow Techdirt

Techdirt Daily Newsletter

Techdirt Deals
Techdirt Insider Discord
The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...