Jose Cuervo Loses Bid To Block Trademark Registration For Il Corvo Wine

from the i'll-drink-to-that dept

When it comes to trademark disputes involving alcohol companies, we should all agree by now that things tend to get really, really silly. Too often a reversion to protectionism causes company lawyers to stretch the plain meaning of words on matters of similarity and the potential for customer confusion. The latest example of this comes to us from South Africa, where the company behind Jose Cuervo tequila attempted, and failed, to block the trademark registration for Il Corvo branded wine.

Tequila Cuervo SA de CV turned to the North Gauteng High Court in Pretoria for relief when Fabrication and Light Engineering CC – South Africa’s largest storage and construction equipment manufacturers – applied for the registration of the proposed Il Corvo trademark.

The tequila manufacturer, which owns the trademarks Cuervo and Jose Cuervo, as well as the raven depicted on some of their products, maintained the proposed Il Corvo mark was likely to deceive or cause confusion because of the mark’s similarity to their registered trademarks.

The court didn’t buy the argument for several reasons. To start, wine and tequila might be said to be in the same or similar marketplaces, but it’s more accurate to say they are in tangential markets. Both products might be sold in the same store, for instance, but nobody is going to accidentally buy a bottle of wine with the intention of buying tequila. It’s something I have been arguing for years: the marketplace distinction for trademarks needs to be more nuanced than a marketplace designation for something like “alcoholic beverages.”

Almost certainly more impactful was that nothing in the trade dress for the two companies or their products was similar. That’s because Il Corvo wasn’t trying to trade on Jose Cuervo’s name at all; it was just a slightly similar name. And that name is ultimately what this was all about. The entire question is whether a wine that incorporated “Corvo” in its name would be confused for a tequila that incorporated “Cuervo” in its name.

The proposed Il Corvo trademark did not globally resemble Tequila Cuervo’s trademarks and were visually and conceptually different. The differences between the marks were stark, the judge said. He said although there was a similarity between Corvo and Cuervo, the overall impression given by the marks based on their distinctive and dominant components were not so similar that it would cause confusion. He said it was extremely unlikely that the notional consumer would know that “corvo” and “cuervo” both mean raven in different languages.

It’s the kind of ruling I wish we saw more of stateside, taking into account the overall impression left with the consumer, rather than defaulting to rewarding protectionism and aggressive policing of a trademark.

Filed Under: , , , ,

Rate this comment as insightful
Rate this comment as funny
You have rated this comment as insightful
You have rated this comment as funny
Flag this comment as abusive/trolling/spam
You have flagged this comment
The first word has already been claimed
The last word has already been claimed
Insightful Lightbulb icon Funny Laughing icon Abusive/trolling/spam Flag icon Insightful badge Lightbulb icon Funny badge Laughing icon Comments icon

Comments on “Jose Cuervo Loses Bid To Block Trademark Registration For Il Corvo Wine”

Subscribe: RSS Leave a comment
8 Comments
bookwallah (profile) says:

But you know how lawyers are

Agreed, this is absurd. But one or two court cases decades ago apparently established (in law, or in lawyers’ minds) the idea that a trademark holder must vigorously oppose *all* even trivial, stretch, or good-cause infringing uses, or risk later losing cases of serious trademark infringements, as if the trademark was effectively abandoned property. Hence all those stories of big corporations sending cease and desist letters to kids’ lemonade stands. The company might not really care, but it wants documentation of efforts to protect the trademark.

NaBUru38 (profile) says:

“wine and tequila might be said to be in the same or similar marketplaces, but it’s more accurate to say they are in tangential markets. Both products might be sold in the same store, for instance, but nobody is going to accidentally buy a bottle of wine with the intention of buying tequila.

It’s something I have been arguing for years: the marketplace distinction for trademarks needs to be more nuanced than a marketplace designation for something like alcoholic beverages.”

I disagree with that reasoning. Companies often produce different kinds of products, like Diageo, Coca Cola and Red Bull. And they may try to use the same brand for different products.

If a customer sees a Pumpd energy drink and a Pumpd vodka, they may think they are from the same company.

In this case, Tequika Cuervo sounds Mexican and Il Corvo sounds Italian.

Add Your Comment

Your email address will not be published.

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here

Comment Options:

Make this the or (get credits or sign in to see balance) what's this?

What's this?

Techdirt community members with Techdirt Credits can spotlight a comment as either the "First Word" or "Last Word" on a particular comment thread. Credits can be purchased at the Techdirt Insider Shop »

Follow Techdirt

Techdirt Daily Newsletter

Techdirt Deals
Techdirt Insider Discord
The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...
Loading...