Supreme Court Will Hear A Case That Could Finally Shut Down East Texas As The Patent Troll Mecca

from the smack-that-cafc dept

Last year, we wrote about an important patent case concerning the common practice of patent trolls going forum shopping. We’ve been writing about how patent trolls have been flocking to East Texas for ten years now, and little has changed. In fact, as we noted last year, there’s one judge in East Texas, Judge Rodney Gilstrap, who famously handled 20% of all patent cases filed in the country in 2014. One judge. And that’s not all the patent cases that come into that court. The towns of Marshall, Texas, and Tyler, Texas, have built a giant industry out of being super friendly to patent trolls. And it’s ridiculous. But there’s a case that could put an end to it and the Supreme Court has thankfully agreed to hear it. The case is called In Re: TC Heartland, and — somewhat ironically — it is not about a case filed in East Texas, but rather in the second favorite patent troll destination: Delaware (which has become more friendly to patent trolls over the last few years — apparently trying to compete with East Texas for the “business.”)

The underlying issue in the case is whether or not a 1990 ruling by the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC) in the VE Holding v. Johnson Gas case basically threw open the floodgates on jurisdiction shopping for patent plaintiffs. This ruling was ridiculous on multiple levels, not the least of which was because one of the driving forces in setting up a centralized appeals court (CAFC) to hear all patent cases was to stop jurisdiction shopping that was happening in the patent space, where patent holders were rushing to favorable courts in favorable circuits. And, yes, the end result has been significantly worse forum shopping than anything that existed prior to CAFC’s existence. And when CAFC got a chance to review this bad decision in hearing the TC Heartland case earlier this year… it didn’t. It left the earlier rule standing.

The good news, of course, is that when the Supreme Court agrees to hear a patent case these days, it almost always means that CAFC is about to get spanked for being ridiculously bad at its main job of properly interpreting patent law. So hopefully things are lining up to see another SCOTUS smackdown of CAFC… and with that smack, an end to East Texas (or any particular jurisdiction) as a patent troll haven.

Filed Under: , , , ,
Companies: tc heartland

Rate this comment as insightful
Rate this comment as funny
You have rated this comment as insightful
You have rated this comment as funny
Flag this comment as abusive/trolling/spam
You have flagged this comment
The first word has already been claimed
The last word has already been claimed
Insightful Lightbulb icon Funny Laughing icon Abusive/trolling/spam Flag icon Insightful badge Lightbulb icon Funny badge Laughing icon Comments icon

Comments on “Supreme Court Will Hear A Case That Could Finally Shut Down East Texas As The Patent Troll Mecca”

Subscribe: RSS Leave a comment
Anon E. Mous (profile) says:

While one would hope that SCOTUS hearing this would resolve the most troll friendly places to file patent lawsuits, I won’t hold my breath that this will be resolved once and for all.

SCOTUS seems to have a tendency to kick things back to the other courts for a do over which can still see issues go unresolved.

It would be nice to see SCOTUS answer this once and for all as they did with the Alice ruling, but SCOTUS can be wishy washy when it seems they don’t want to be the one to make a decision

Brian (profile) says:

Re: Re:

The Supreme Court did decide this issue in the Fourco case in 1957.

“We hold that 28 U.S.C. § 1400(b) is the sole and exclusive provision controlling venue in patent infringement actions”

A decision that would effectively end patent cases in East Texas. But the Federal Circuit overturned the Supreme Court precedent in the 1990 VE Holdings case and created a race to the bottom of corruption which East Texas is winning.

The only question here is if the Supreme Court is going to try to temporarily overturn the Federal Circuit law on venue.

Add Your Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here

Comment Options:

Make this the or (get credits or sign in to see balance) what's this?

What's this?

Techdirt community members with Techdirt Credits can spotlight a comment as either the "First Word" or "Last Word" on a particular comment thread. Credits can be purchased at the Techdirt Insider Shop »

Follow Techdirt

Techdirt Daily Newsletter

Techdirt Deals
Techdirt Insider Discord
The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...