the weasel faced cunt Ciaran Martin, must have lacked the love of his parents or been shunned because of the way he looked and thinks that screwing everyone in the UK is the best revenge he could ever get! what a self-centered prick!

I’m guessing GCHQ’s “job titling clerk” doesn’t understand what ICT stands for!… and so, went with “Director-General of Cyber”, instead of “Dir-Gen:ICT”! And the said etymology of “Cyber” notwithstanding!… the Greek root for CONTROL is “neme (from where we get ‘-nomy’, for ‘management’!… and nemesis, for state, condition, or process of control– not, someone’s ‘antithetical rival’!)”, not “cyber”, or “cybern (from the Greek word, kubernaó… ‘to steer’!)”! And!… the Greek morphemic element for Agent and Agency is “etes/ ete/ et/ tes/ and even “t”, respectively (from which “-et”, in “cybern_et_ics”, is derived!… and not from the suffixal adjective, “-tics”, for “-sis”– as some, have presumed!)! And “-ic” is from the Greek suffixal morphemic element, “-ikos”!… softened to “-ic (for, ‘pertaining to’!… and the unused suffixal morphemic element ‘-os’, referring to that which is ‘characteristic of’!… ‘abounding in’!… and, etc.!)”!
.
In other words, the best Greek expression for the most efficient and effective catchphrase for the notion of Information CONTROL Technology, is “Eidonemethkhnia (i.e., ‘information control thkhni’!… and thkhni, being from the original Greek term, ‘τέχνη’!… for craft!)!… or in the contemporary parlance, “Edionemetechnea (i.e., ‘information control techne’!)”! And!… the product/ s, service/ s, or form/ s of Edionemetechnea, would be ‘Eidonemethkhnoma/ e’!… or in the contemporary singular parlance, “Edionemetechnea”, and in the plural parlance, “Edionemetechnomae”, respectively!
.
And!… incidentally!… “technology” is a poor expression for a techne’s/ craft’s product/ service/ form!… as the suffixal morphemic element, “-ology (from the Greek ‘logos’– for word!… and ‘logia’!)”, refers to the “study of” something!
.
The Greek suffixal element, “-ma (see, https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/-%CE%BC%CE%B1… and -μᾰ!), refers to a “form of something”! For example, the Greek word “dran,” refers to “something done”!… and a “form of something done” is “drama (the ‘n’ being dropped, and ‘-ma’ added!)”! But!… and unfortunately!… and as is so often the case in language!… the term “drama” was “hijacked” by users of this expression… and began to be used, exclusively, in reference to that which is “done” by those on a stage! And although theatrical expression is “something done”… it is but one example of “something done”; and thus, should not be made synonymous with “drama”– as such! And so.. and to return to “techne (the Greek expression for a field, craft, industry!)”!… a product, service or form of a given techne, would be expressed as a technoma (in singular form!), and technomae (in plural form!)!… in contrast, to “technology (a rather bumbling way to express a techne’s product, service, or form!)”!
.
Lastly, if we desire a more efficient and effective term for Information Communications Technology, then we would use the term, “Eidoepikoino̱nió̱ntechnea (i.e., ‘Eidos/ information_epikoino̱nió̱n/ communications_techne/ craft’!… epikoino̱nió̱n– or communications!– being from the Greek word, επικοινωνιών!)”! And a product, service, or form of Eidoepikoino̱nió̱ntechnea, being, “Edioepikoino̱nió̱ntechnoma” in the singular, and “Eidoepikoino̱nió̱ntechnae” in the plural! However!… we would no longer refer to this field as ICT!… but rather, as EET (or ET!… for short!… and not to be confused with our extraterrestrial neighbors!)!
.
Please!… no emails!

A lovely little story I have just read

Hi there!

by submission | Oct 20, 2008

Author : Rob Burton

Dear Victim,

I am writing to you to tell you that, in a short while, you are going to be arrested for killing the Prime Minister. You didn’t do it, right? Wrong. Here at MI6, when we want to kill someone and say that you did it, you can be sure that we’ve made sure that you did.

I picked you for several reasons. Firstly, you have an interest in world affairs and have spent time on the internet researching terrorism. Now, I know that you are going to say, ‘but I wasn’t researching how to be a terrorist, I’m just concerned’. Well the courts won’t see it that way now that I’ve altered the list. Secondly, you have annoyed a few people over the years – some of them really hate you, you know – and so we got them to write their opinions on you on ‘mebook’. The press will look you up, and it will help us a lot if nobody likes you. Thirdly, you have short, dark hair, a heavy brow and a facial scar, which makes a conviction 18% more likely. Fourthly you are a liberal who is known to disagree with recent government policy – this gives you motive, and we like to eliminate as many threats as we can with one action. It’s more elegant. Lastly I picked you because, of all the many people who fit the profile, I don’t like the look of you.

According to your psychological profile, upon finishing this email you will attempt to run away – I hope you do, as it will further incriminate you – and that telling you this will not dissuade you. A few words of advice: Do not take your car, we can track it. Similarly, do not steal or borrow anyone else’s car. We can also track your mobile, PDA and laptop, and use them as listening devices. Do not go through any major urban areas; the cameras can pick up your ID using face recognition. Do not go anywhere near an airport or port either, for the same reason. Follow these simple rules and I give you six hours.

Thanks to the national DNA and biometric database, and a quick search through your bins, we have planted enough evidence around the site to easily convict you. Juries believe that DNA and biometric evidence is a rubber stamp for conviction. It is not, but they watch too much crime drama to be convinced otherwise. Also, we have hacked the new brain scan lie detector that Juries love so much, so it will show that you are feeling as guilty as a priest at a bondage party.

We thought that you might want to know why. Well, as you know, the current government has increased our budget and power exponentially over the last few terms. Now, it seems, the Prime Minister may be regretting a few of those choices. We cannot allow that, so we have killed him, demonstrating to his replacement (who is now guaranteed to win the next election) that we are not to be trifled with. This means that we can get whatever we want, which is more of the same, actually. Longer detention periods, fewer rights and greater surveillance. More power for us to play.

And why am I telling you this like some idiotic bond villain? Because it makes no difference to your fate, and because my boss and I think it’s hilarious.

This message will delete itself, leaving absolutely no trace, in two seconds.

Trust me. I know your reading speed.