Business Promoting Children Reading Sues Schools Over Trademarks For Encouraging Reading

from the think-of-the-children! dept

We’ve occasionally seen instances in the past in which educational institutions are threatened with trademark lawsuits or actually go through them, though those suits usually feature the worst trademark bullies out there (hi, Olympics!). Rarer is seeing some small business owner pestering schools with trademark disputes. Still rarer are cases in which those businesses are actually involved in the business of trying to promote education.

Yet that’s exactly what we have in the case of Springboards to Education, which has filed nine trademark suits against seven school districts, a non-profit, and a library.

The concept of incentivizing students to read across school districts in the Rio Grande Valley and around the state has recently taken an ambiguous turn as some districts are facing lawsuits claiming trademark infringement for using descriptions such as “Millionaire Reader” or “Millionaire Reading Club.”

So far, the defendants include the school districts of McAllen, Pharr-San Juan-Alamo, Mission, La Joya and Houston, as well as the public charter schools IDEA and KIPP. The education nonprofit Teach For America is also included, as well as the library supply company Demco. Each lawsuit presents evidence of Springboard’s owner and creator Johnny Lopez’s trademarks, which include the phrases Millionaire Reader, trademarked in 2012; Read a Million Words, trademarked in 2011; Millionaire’s Reading Club, trademarked in 2012; Million Dollar Reader, trademarked in 2013; and Feel Like a Million Bucks, trademarked in 2015.

We’ll leave the non-profit and library aside for a moment, as I cannot say for certain that either are not engaged in any kind of commerce revolving around Springboard’s trademarks. That said, the gall involved in suing schools for trying to get kids to engage in reading is matched only by the silliness of it. These schools should simply be able to stand up in court, inform the court that they are educating children instead of engaging in any sort of commerce, and that should satisfy the court as proof that none of them are competing in a marketplace with Springboard, rendering the trademark suit neutered. However, none of this kept Springboard from firing off a cease-and-desist letter to these schools, shortly before filing suit.

“It has been brought up to our attention that your school district, Pharr-San Juan-Alamo ISD, has been using the trademarks Millionaire Reader, Million Dollar Reader … and/or any combination of words similar to our client’s trademarks in association with the marketing or sale of your products,” the letter states. “We demand that you cease and desist in any further use of the Springboard Trademarks.”

At least one of the schools in question understands how trademark law works, it seems, and is preparing for the exact defense that I had recommended above.

The district has already filed a motion to dismiss the claims, said school district attorney Ben Castillo, adding the district is not using any of its materials for commercial gain.

“There’s no commercial gain,” he said. “School districts use these to promote students, not to make money. … We have stopped using that phrase once we received that cease and desist, so at this point in time we feel like there’s no damage to Springboard.”

Meanwhile, we now live in a world where a private business has sued a public school district in order to keep it from promoting reading to students in a specific way. Delightful.

Filed Under: , , , , ,
Companies: springboard

Rate this comment as insightful
Rate this comment as funny
You have rated this comment as insightful
You have rated this comment as funny
Flag this comment as abusive/trolling/spam
You have flagged this comment
The first word has already been claimed
The last word has already been claimed
Insightful Lightbulb icon Funny Laughing icon Abusive/trolling/spam Flag icon Insightful badge Lightbulb icon Funny badge Laughing icon Comments icon

Comments on “Business Promoting Children Reading Sues Schools Over Trademarks For Encouraging Reading”

Subscribe: RSS Leave a comment
Will Braunfeld says:

I Feel Like a Million Bucks

…this is a common phrase. It’s been colloquial slang for feeling good, high-spirited, and cheerful for longer – I’d wager – than Springboards to Education has existed. Why in God’s name are we putting trademarks on colloquial terms? Right up there with “X on a computer” patents in my mind.

Should be careful, pretty soon “I’d wager” is gonna be owned by some casino, and “Why in God’s name” will be trademarked by a church somewhere. If they haven’t been already.

That One Guy (profile) says:

'Pyrrhic victory' comes to mind here...

Yet another case where attempting to ‘protect’ a trademark instead tarnishes it more than any amount of infringement of it could have ever managed.

Somehow I don’t imagine any of those on the receiving end of these legal threats, or who hear about this will be interested in the slightest in having anything to do with Springboard, now or at any point in the future, so congrats on your stellar PR campaign there Springboard, you (hopefully after a stunt like this) positively wrecked your own reputation for the low cost of a few C&D’s and lawsuits.

Roger Strong (profile) says:

Re: 10 sec google search.

Well, sure. Millionaire Reader from 2001 also. You can Google their newly trademarked terms along with a random year before they trademarked them, and find plenty of examples of their use.

And “Feel Like a Million Bucks, trademarked in 2015″…. Seriously? SERIOUSLY?

Springboards to Education is a parasite. A scam. And not an original one; the practice of trademarking popular phrases has been around a long time thanks to the notoriously incompetent USPTO. Consider for example:

Wikipedia: Let’s roll

The phrase is well-documented to have been in popular use for many decades, for example Cary Grant using the it in a 1938 movie. But when it was used on 9/11, more than a dozen applicants rushed to trademark it.

The Todd M. Beamer Foundation was eventually granted a trademark for uses of the phrase relating to “pre-recorded compact discs, audio tapes, digital audio tapes, and phonograph records featuring music.”

And since the Florida State Seminoles were using the term, they had to license it from the foundation. Because apparently college football can be mistaken for CDs and tapes.

Over it. says:

Re: 10 sec google search.

Are you serious? We’re talking Trademark here…not patent. There’s no such thing as prior art. If anyone understood Trademarks at all there would be none of this idiotic discussion on this thread. Springboards Trademarked the phrases, formed a profitable company and campaign, it was stolen by people working for the schools and companies that were sued, and the company was damaged. Springboards deserves to get its profits from its hard work and success. Just because thieves hide under the cloak of government (public schools) doesn’t mean Springboards shouldn’t be able to recover. If people would bone up on their IP knowledge, there’d be none of this senseless drivel. Also, misquote above–there wasn’t a motion to dismiss all claims, it was just the state claims…not that anyone probably understands what that means…

Add Your Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here

Comment Options:

Make this the or (get credits or sign in to see balance) what's this?

What's this?

Techdirt community members with Techdirt Credits can spotlight a comment as either the "First Word" or "Last Word" on a particular comment thread. Credits can be purchased at the Techdirt Insider Shop »

Follow Techdirt

Techdirt Daily Newsletter

Techdirt Deals
Techdirt Insider Discord
The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...