Comcast Battles Google Fiber In Atlanta — With Threat Of Usage Caps Unless You Sign 3-Year Contract

from the almost-but-not-quite-competing dept

With Google Fiber now starting to encroach on some major Comcast territories, the company’s suddenly finding itself in the unfamiliar position of actually having to compete on price. In Atlanta, where Google Fiber is expected to appear later this year or early next, Comcast has been circulating flyers urging locals not to fall for the “hype” of ultra-fast, relatively cheap Google Fiber service.

But given that Atlanta is one of Comcast’s growing usage cap “trial” markets, many were wondering just how far Comcast was willing to go in terms of competing on price. With the company’s announcement this week that it’s beginning to deploy gigabit cable service (technically 1 Gbps downstream, 35 Mbps upstream) in Atlanta, Comcast’s strategy has become somewhat more clear. According to the company, Comcast will offer its gigabit service for $70 a month if you sign a contract, but $140 a month if you choose to go without.

The press release not-too-surprisingly chooses to omit this, but if a customer chooses to go the non-contract route, they’ll find themselves subject to Comcast’s 300 GB monthly usage cap and overage fees:

“That’s Comcast’s attempt at price competition, given that Atlanta is one of the markets Google Fiber has targeted for deployment. Comcast tells me that while the $70 option will not feature the company’s usage caps (which are being “trialed” in the Atlanta market) users on the no-contract, $140 plan will face usage caps. They also have the option of paying $35 per month extra to avoid said caps.”

In other words, if you lock yourself down in a three-year contract to avoid usage caps, you’ll obviously not be able to sign up for Google Fiber without a major penalty when the service arrives. If a customer chooses to go without a contract to leave their options open — they’ll face either a 300 GB cap and $10 per 50 GB overage fees, or the option of paying a $35 per month fee to avoid the usage caps entirely. So yes, Comcast’s “competing,” but in only the way Comcast can.

Much like its usage cap plans, Comcast states these early gigabit cable deployments (Nashville, Chicago, Detroit and Miami on deck) are just trials, and the company’s pricing could shift depending on whether this latest long-term contract gambit is effective at keeping potential Google Fiber customers from jumping ship.

Filed Under: , , ,
Companies: comcast, google

Rate this comment as insightful
Rate this comment as funny
You have rated this comment as insightful
You have rated this comment as funny
Flag this comment as abusive/trolling/spam
You have flagged this comment
The first word has already been claimed
The last word has already been claimed
Insightful Lightbulb icon Funny Laughing icon Abusive/trolling/spam Flag icon Insightful badge Lightbulb icon Funny badge Laughing icon Comments icon

Comments on “Comcast Battles Google Fiber In Atlanta — With Threat Of Usage Caps Unless You Sign 3-Year Contract”

Subscribe: RSS Leave a comment
That One Guy (profile) says:

Re: Re:

It would take some work wording the contract right but a way for Google to make it even more tempting to switch, even for those that would have to take a penalty for dumping Comcast before the contract was over would be to offer a ‘signing bonus/credit’ to offset the penalty.

Say something like, ‘Switch to us from another ISP and if you get hit by early termination fees for doing so simply send us a copy of the relevant paperwork so we can verify it and we’ll apply 50% of that amount towards your service costs with us’. In one fell swoop they’d bring attention to the penalties Comcast is using to keep their customers locked into their service and provide hefty incentives for people to switch providers by drastically cutting down on the cost of doing so.

That One Guy (profile) says:

Comcast: 'You pay us for internet service not because we're the best, but because you have no choice.'

Twice the price and capped if you want to avoid signing a contract that prevents you from jumping ship the second Google Fiber is available… you can practically taste the desperation from Comcast here, they really don’t want their customers to be able to switch without being charged a hefty penalty for doing so.

Either they get twice as much(or more) from customers who aren’t chained to them and might switch providers at any point, or they get less from customers who can’t do so and have to pay them for at least three years. They’re making sure that they get as much money as possible either way, about as ‘competitive’ as Comcast can be I suppose.

That Anonymous Coward (profile) says:

Re: Re: Re:

but it won’t be because the crossover points will be choked so your speed will plummet…

Imagine paying for gigabit and struggling to hit the 300gb cap in a month. That seems much more likely, and in no way would it be driven by Comcast demanding payments from online providers for allowing them better access to their customers.

Eponymous Coward (profile) says:

Re: Re:

Comcast hears your concerns, loyal customer. We have included the usage cap of 300GB for your protection, as our crack research scientists have determined that downloading at gigabit speeds will warp space and time in your vicinity. Sustained downloads of more than 300GB could cause unexpected time travel, catapulting users into the distant future or pulling velociraptors into the present time. We know you don’t want that, so we added this feature for your protection.

Overage fees will placate the space-time continuum, allowing for more rapid closure of temporal wormholes. Actually, space-time wanted $20 per 50GB (can you believe the nerve?), but we talked it down to $10. You’re welcome.

That One Guy (profile) says:

Re: Re: Re:

Going off the math of 300 GB’s gone through in 40ish minutes, with $10 per 50GB overage fees, I imagine anyone using even close to the full theoretical limit of the connection could easily end up with a bill in the four or five digits range by month’s end.

If someone wants to crunch some actually numbers though for a more accurate amount that’d certainly be interesting to see.

ThatDevilTech (profile) says:

Re: Re: Re: Re:

If I did the math right, I figured up a bill of around $64,740 for the month. Using the site here to figure up 1000 Gps daily usage then subtracting 300 GB for the first day and using the max for the remaining days for a 30 day month. If you want to check my math, Click Here

This was a quick a dirty estimation. Not sure how accurate but I’d still take the ETF over this bs. Thank God I’m not in a Craptastic area.

Anonymous Coward says:

Re: Re: Re: Re:

According to my quick calculations assuming that 1 Gigabit=1000 Megabit (There is some disagreement on if it is 1024 or 1000) and 1 Gigabyte = 1024 Megabyte:

After the 300 Gigabyte has been subtracted you can download 316406.25 Gigabyte in a month.
This makes 6329 fees of $10 which of course gives:


This is on top of the $140 you pay for the connection itself and assuming everything runs at top speed at all times (it’s Comcast so who really believes that?).

ThatDevilTech (profile) says:

Re: Re: Re:5 Re:

Fair enough. Either way it’s a helluva lot more than I would pay and I’d just take thee ETF and tell Comcast where they could stick their cable. Someone needs to wake up and fight back against all of the bs going on. Nowadays, Internet is almost as important, if not on the same level, as electricity. People need it for work, communications, and fun yes, but to live their life nowadays. We do live in a first world country don’t we…don’t we?

That Anonymous Coward (profile) says:

Re: Re: Re:

that is the best part is all speeds are promised as up to, so as long as you are getting 15kbps they are doing their job.

And don’t forget the infographic will show you all of these awesome things you can get when you pay them extra for tv programming and then can use their VOD system without it counting against your meter (which no one thinks works right).

Bob Buttons (profile) says:

Not Holding Back

I currently have ‘unlimited’ data with Time Warner am I pretty reasonable with it. I use a good amount compared to others I know but I still don’t go insanely overboard. If TWC were to enact a cap and require paying more to go back to unlimited, I can promise you I’d no longer hold back by any means. You want me to pay extra to get rid of a cap? My usage is skyrocketing.

Anonymous Coward says:

Re: Not Holding Back

That’s what I did, when Comcast capped my plan in Atlanta. 300 GB cap? My target usage had been from 80 to 120 GB for the three months prior to the cap. Thereafter, my target became 296 GB to leave a small safety buffer. Amazing how much bandwidth you can consume by adding a 24/7/365 Freenet node.

Anonymous Coward says:

It is precisely these types of protection measures which favor in no way the customer, that would ensure I would wait and not pay anything to Comcast that locked me down until I could jump ship. I would do so for pure spite if for no other reason as I have a long memory of being screwed over or attempts at doing the same.

Were I in Atlanta, Google could not come soon enough and I could not throw money at Google fast enough to show my disapproval of present day methods used by the major telcos.

Anonymous Coward says:

At $140/month + $35/month to remove the bandwidth cap, after 14 months it is cheaper to get the three year agreement with Comcast for $70/month and then sign up for Google fiber at $70/month paying for both services for the last 22 months (ignoring taxes and fees). If you don’t care about the bandwidth cap the break even point on cost is after 18 months (ignoring taxes and fees). So how long until Google fiber is available at your address in ATL is the question to be asking. Then assuming you get your Google fiber service at the breakeven point, if you terminate the Comcast agreement, as long as the termination charge is less than $1,540 ($1,260 for bandwidth cap) you save the difference by terminating the Comcast service.

Scott (profile) says:

Comcast is Afraid

Being an Atlanta resident who just had need of a Comcast service call this weekend because line quality (noise in the line)has been horrible, I had an “off the record” chat with the guy who came out. He said they were really worried about Googles roll out in ATL. He said they are working so hard to upgrade lines that they keep screwing stuff up (thus noise in the lines…not very good with internet service). Really though, it doesnt look like Comcast is trying very hard, if you ask me.

ThatDevilTech (profile) says:

Re: Comcast is Afraid

While I can’t wait for Google to take a bite out of the big cable provider/ISP guys, I feel sorry for those that are stuck with the idiots while Google gets installed in every neighborhood but theirs. The town I live in was actually on one of the first lists to fight for Google to come to us, but sadly our town leaders weren’t able to win that battle. Eventually we’ll get it. Thankfully, for now, we have a non-Comcast/TWC/Charter/Verizon/AT&T cable provider that works just fine.

Anonymous Coward says:

Location, Location, Location

I am leaving one of the Atlanta areas under the “trial” for the 300 GB cap. AT&T is a painful joke of an alternative. Comcursed’s lie of “competition” can only be defeated in and around Atlanta by changing location to one served not at all by Comcursed or in the promised but indefinite future one served by Comcursed *and Google*.

I told Comcursed to drop dead about six months back, when they insisted that I had to pay $10/month to continue receiving paper bills.

I’m currently in the midst of moving to a new flat outside of Comcursed’s demesne. I’m straddling two places at the moment. At the new flat, I’ve got accounts with two ISPs that together give me (only) about the same bandwidth potential as Comcursed used to (Comcursed charged just under $80 monthly for that). One of the new services comes with a 250GB cap – the other is unlimited bandwidth. Total, monthly cost is initially a couple of cents under $60, and after the 12 monthly honeymoon period (if I stay – no penalty, if not), it will be a couple of cents under $90.

Are you listening Comcursed…your asshattery didn’t make me move but strongly influenced my choice of locations, i.e., anywhere to avoid you. You should feel *special*.

David (profile) says:

Real speed?

I keep seeing people calculating the speed as really a gigabit. I have hard wired gigabit in my house and I never see anywhere near that speed. There is protocol overhead, collisions, listening delays, PC architecture and all kinds of other issues the prevent Ethernet from reaching its theoretical speed limit. At best, you will see 50 to 60 percent throughput.

Add Your Comment

Your email address will not be published.

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here

Comment Options:

Make this the or (get credits or sign in to see balance) what's this?

What's this?

Techdirt community members with Techdirt Credits can spotlight a comment as either the "First Word" or "Last Word" on a particular comment thread. Credits can be purchased at the Techdirt Insider Shop »

Follow Techdirt

Techdirt Daily Newsletter

Techdirt Deals
Techdirt Insider Discord
The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...
Older Stuff
10:50 NY AG Proves Broadband Industry Funded Phony Public Support For Attack On Net Neutrality (10)
06:24 The GOP Is Using Veterans As Props To Demonize Net Neutrality (22)
06:03 Telecom Using Veterans As Props To Demonize California's New Net Neutrality Law (12)
09:32 AT&T Whines That California Net Neutrality Rules Are Forcing It To Behave (11)
06:23 The New York Times (Falsely) Informs Its 7 Million Readers Net Neutrality Is 'Pointless' (51)
15:34 Facebook's Australian News Ban Did Demonstrate The Evil Of Zero Rating (18)
04:58 'Net Neutrality Hurt Internet Infrastructure Investment' Is The Bad Faith Lie That Simply Won't Die (11)
05:48 Dumb New GOP Talking Point: If You Restore Net Neutrality, You HAVE To Kill Section 230. Just Because! (66)
06:31 DOJ Drops Ridiculous Trump-Era Lawsuit Against California For Passing Net Neutrality Rules (13)
06:27 The Wall Street Journal Kisses Big Telecom's Ass In Whiny Screed About 'Big Tech' (13)
10:45 New Interim FCC Boss Jessica Rosenworcel Will Likely Restore Net Neutrality, Just Not Yet (5)
15:30 Small Idaho ISP 'Punishes' Twitter And Facebook's 'Censorship' ... By Blocking Access To Them Entirely (81)
05:29 A Few Reminders Before The Tired Net Neutrality Debate Is Rekindled (13)
06:22 U.S. Broadband Speeds Jumped 90% in 2020. But No, It Had Nothing To Do With Killing Net Neutrality. (12)
12:10 FCC Ignores The Courts, Finalizes Facts-Optional Repeal Of Net Neutrality (19)
10:46 It's Opposite Day At The FCC: Rejects All Its Own Legal Arguments Against Net Neutrality To Claim It Can Be The Internet Speech Police (13)
12:05 Blatant Hypocrite Ajit Pai Decides To Move Forward With Bogus, Unconstitutional Rulemaking On Section 230 (178)
06:49 FCC's Pai Puts Final Bullet In Net Neutrality Ahead Of Potential Demotion (25)
06:31 The EU Makes It Clear That 'Zero Rating' Violates Net Neutrality (6)
06:22 DOJ Continues Its Quest To Kill Net Neutrality (And Consumer Protection In General) In California (11)
11:08 Hypocritical AT&T Makes A Mockery Of Itself; Says 230 Should Be Reformed For Real Net Neutrality (28)
06:20 Trump, Big Telecom Continue Quest To Ban States From Protecting Broadband Consumers (19)
06:11 Senators Wyden And Markey Make It Clear AT&T Is Violating Net Neutrality (13)
06:31 Net Neutrali-what? AT&T's New Streaming Service Won't Count Against Its Broadband Caps. But Netflix Will. (25)
06:23 Telecom's Latest Dumb Claim: The Internet Only Works During A Pandemic Because We Killed Net Neutrality (49)
13:36 Ex-FCC Staffer Says FCC Authority Given Up In Net Neutrality Repeal Sure Would Prove Handy In A Crisis (13)
06:27 Clarence Thomas Regrets Brand X Decision That Paved Way For The Net Neutrality Wars (11)
06:17 The FCC To Field More Comments On Net Neutrality. Maybe They'll Stop Identity Theft And Fraud This Time? (79)
08:56 AT&T, Comcast Dramatically Cut Network Spending Despite Net Neutrality Repeal (16)
06:18 Ajit Pai Hits CES... To Make Up Some Shit About Net Neutrality (24)
More arrow