UK Police Deny Misspelling Led To Investigation, Say It Was Other Schoolwork Instead
from the still-a-problem dept
We had just relayed a story via the BBC about an elementary school kid in the UK earning a visit to his home from the authorities after writing in an English assignment that he lived in a “terrorist house”, when he reportedly was trying to say he lived in a “terraced house.” The crux of this story was that the UK’s Anti-Terrorism law, which requires that school teachers act as surveillance agents for the state in an attempt to weed out future-radicalized will-be-terrorists is a policy built for unintended chaos, given that teachers are neither trained nor properly equipped to fulfill this role. The resulting visit to the boy’s home by the authorities from a misspelled word was billed as an example of this overreach by government.
But, as some in the comments pointed out, Lancashire police have pushed back on the BBC’s story, saying that it wasn’t the misspelled words that triggered the visit and ultimately resulted in the authorities determining there was no need for an investigation, but was instead other schoolwork the boy had done that triggered the visit and ultimately resulted in the authorities determining there was no need for an investigation.
In a statement, police and the county council said it was “untrue to suggest that this situation was brought about by a simple spelling mistake. The school and the police have acted responsibly and proportionately in looking into a number of potential concerns using a low-key, local approach,” it said. “No concerns were identified and no further action was required by any agency.”
For some reason, there are those that think this vindicates both law enforcement and the UK’s law because police say the spelling error had nothing to do with any of this. I can’t quite figure out the logic of those people, because this is still a story about a teacher using schoolwork to identify a Muslim boy possibly being dangerous that triggered a visit to the boy’s home from the authorities. While the BBC has pulled its original post as a result of the pushback, the fundamentals of the story haven’t really changed at all. We still have a scared child and an annoyed family stemming from law enforcement action built on the back of a teacher picking through the child’s schoolwork. That isn’t a sustainable model for combating terrorism, but it is a sustainable model for alienating an entire subsection of a nation’s population.
Miqdaad Versi, assistant secretary-general of the Muslim Council of Britain, the UK’s largest umbrella group for Islamic associations, said he was aware of dozens of cases similar to that of the schoolboy.
“There are huge concerns that individuals going about their daily life are being seen through the lens of security and are being seen as potential terrorists rather than students,” he said. “This is a natural consequence of the extension of the ‘Prevent Duty’ to schools.”
Regardless of the police pushback, which was extremely light on details, that hasn’t changed.
Filed Under: children, homework, police, spelling, terrorist, uk
Comments on “UK Police Deny Misspelling Led To Investigation, Say It Was Other Schoolwork Instead”
Yes, because the police never lies.
“Terrorists ate my homework”.
I bet that was the schoolwork that moved them to investigate.
Re: Re:
“Terrorists ate my homework”
I think he wanted to say “Terriers ate my homework” but autocorrect kicked in.
Re: Re: Re:
All that would have done was alert the CIA to take the kid away to an undisclosed blacksite.
Re: Re:
Exactly. “The police and the county council said that the the police and school have acted responsibly and proportionately…”
Pardon me if I remain sceptical.
It wasn’t the spelling mistake. It was gremlins. That makes it all better right?
Re: Re:
Err I mean the school and the state acted completely responsibly. All details are classified. That is all.
Other school work
“The boy put his name, Muhammad, on all of his assignments and that prompted the investigation” one official was quoted as saying.
“We knew he was a terrorist because his education seems to be far more advanced than anything the UK curriculum teaches.”
That isn’t a sustainable model for combating terrorism, but it is a sustainable model for alienating an entire subsection of a nation’s population.
As we all know, sustainable forestry only occurs when we plant at least as many trees as we cut down. Likewise, counter-terrorism is only sustainable if we create as many terrorists as we destroy.
“we didnt make a mistake… since we knew he was muslim we already collected his schoolwork and already had him under surveillance. It wasn’t the spelling error at all.”
surveillance from the crib to the grave
Lame excuses
‘But there was a bunch of other stuff as well, honest!’
Unless they are willing to give details, this sounds really, really lame. Possibly even then.
"I live in a terraced house."
I wonder if the police wouldn’t still have been called if he had correctly written “terraced”. He’s a Muslim kid, and the word “terraced” sounds an awful lot like “terrorist”. It’s not hard to imagine a fearful-of-prison teacher saying, “Maybe we just need to be sure?”
Re: "I live in a terraced house."
If he had written “terraced” the teacher could have just corrected his spelling of “terrorist” and then called the police anyways.
Re: Re: "I live in a terraced house."
You don’t suppose…surely it isn’t possible…that he asked the teacher how to spell “terraced” in the first place…and the teacher told him “T-E-R-R-O-R-I-S-T”.
Well I'm frightened by
Those dessert folk who make bombes. If GCHQ don’t move fast we could all end up with cream on our faces.
What other schoolwork?
…silence…
Yeah, that’s what I thought.
Re: What other schoolwork?
Their not in Schools they are terrorist pens
where free thinking is not allowed
Oh, yeah!
Oh, yeah.. I’m sure the cops showing up at their door, barging in, searching their house, and questioning everyone at length because of the “schoolwork” of a kid under 11 felt super-responsible and soooo “proportional” to the family in question.
You have to wonder if the “solution” isn’t more likely to “radicalise” said child way more effectively than whatever it is they thought he’d been “exposed” to…. I know I’d grow up pretty pissed-off if I got pulled in and scared the shit out of for schoolwork…
Re: Oh, yeah!
It’s just as well the lad didn’t make a clock and bring it in to school to show Teacher.
It wasn't just a spelling mistake
it was a Muslim making a spelling mistake.
Re: It wasn't just a spelling mistake
it was a Muslim making a spelling mistake.
Oh, well, in that case then, carry on.
Not a suprrrize
Juts today the UK Home Orifice got caught owt whith a putblicition for migrants. A testisis. An English lanuguage testis.
Yeah the thing is they can’t even spell “language” Really. I shit you not.
http://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2016/jan/22/home-office-misspells-language-english-tests-announcement
those damned dirty tourists are gonna destroy ‘murica!
/sarcasm because the UK police have no common sense or a sense of humo(u)r
“is a policy built for unintended chaos”
You can’t build something for unintended consequences. Let me fix that for you:
“is a policy built to foment chaos and fear”
Funny I thought the story was about the police suspecting he was in an old die hard IRA family before I got to the part about the family being Muslim