Louis Vuitton Loses Trademark Lawsuit Over Joke Bag; Judge Tells Company To Maybe Laugh A Little Rather Than Sue

from the get-a-sense-of-humor dept

When I was very little, my father drove a 1972 Ford Pinto (yes, one of the exploding versions) that had a faded bumper sticker reading “My other car is a Porsche.” I remember this very clearly because I remember, at a very young age, asking my father to explain the “joke” and still not really getting it. Of course, that “my other car is a…” joke has been around for a long time. It may not be a good joke, but it’s a pretty well-known joke. Except, apparently, for the overly serious trademark lawyers at Louis Vuitton.

We’ve covered Louis Vuitton’s ridiculous trademark bullying for years — including shutting down an art exhibit that commented on LV’s trademarks, suing an artist for calling attention to the situation in Darfur by painting a refugee child holding a bag that kinda, but not really, looked like an LV bag, and suing Hyundai for showing a basketball decorated decorated with the LV symbols in a commercial for 1 second (incredibly, LV won that lawsuit for reasons I still can’t understand). Yes, this brief image was “trademark infringement” according to the court:

And that’s not all. It used the victory over Hyundai to sue Warner Bros. because an LV bag appears briefly in the movie (thankfully, they lost that one). Oh, and then there was the time LV’s lawyers actually threatened UPenn’s law school for holding a trademark symposium with the following poster:
And that brings us to the latest case, spotted via The Trademark Blog, in which Louis Vuitton sued a small company called “My Other Bag” which made (you guessed it!) bags that play off the “my other car…” joke:
Thankfully, while Louis Vuitton’s lawyers didn’t get the joke, Judge Jesse Furman, totally got the joke, and thought that perhaps Louis Vuitton’s lawyers might want to loosen up a bit and enjoy the joke as well:

Louis Vuitton is, by its own description, an ?active[] and aggressive[]? enforcer of its trademark rights…. In some cases, however, it is better to ?accept the implied compliment in [a] parody? and to smile or laugh than it is to sue…. This ? like Haute Diggity Dog (and, arguably, Hyundai) ? is such a case. MOB?s use of Louis Vuitton?s marks in service of what is an obvious attempt at humor is not likely to cause confusion or the blurring of the distinctiveness of Louis Vuitton?s marks; if anything, it is likely only to reinforce and enhance the distinctiveness and notoriety of the famous brand. Accordingly, and for the reasons stated above, MOB is entitled to summary judgment on all of Louis Vuitton?s claims; it follows that Louis Vuitton?s own motion for partial summary judgment must be and is denied.

You’ll notice the mention of that nutty Hyundai ruling in this one. Here, the judge distinguished the case from the Hyundai one, noting that in this case, unlike the Hyundai case, the commentary is clearly about Louis Vuitton and its brand, making it clearly parodying the mark itself. However, the judge also adds a footnote that more or less says that he probably would have decided that case differently too:

Even if Hyundai were not distinguishable, this Court would decline to follow it. In the Court?s view, the Hyundai Court blurred the distinction between association and dilution. As discussed in more detail below, association is a necessary, but not sufficient, condition for a finding of dilution by blurring.

Either way, throughout the ruling you can see that the judge is mainly just frustrated that Louis Vuitton’s lawyers can’t just enjoy a joke. From the opening:

Louis Vuitton Malletier, S.A. (?Louis Vuitton?), the maker of Louis Vuitton bags, is perhaps unfamiliar with the ?my other car? trope. Or maybe it just cannot take a joke.

And, later, during the discussion on Hyundai, the judge again notes the lack of a sense of humor by LV’s lawyers:

…the fact that Louis Vuitton at least does not find the comparison funny is immaterial; Louis Vuitton?s sense of humor (or lack thereof) does not delineate the parameters of its rights (or MOB?s rights) under trademark law.

Either way, this is a good ruling, pushing back on yet another case of Louis Vuitton’s trademark bullying. One hopes that the company will take up the judge’s suggestion to maybe accept the compliment and laugh a little, but somehow that seems unlikely.

Filed Under: , , , ,
Companies: louis vuitton, lvmh, my other bag

Rate this comment as insightful
Rate this comment as funny
You have rated this comment as insightful
You have rated this comment as funny
Flag this comment as abusive/trolling/spam
You have flagged this comment
The first word has already been claimed
The last word has already been claimed
Insightful Lightbulb icon Funny Laughing icon Abusive/trolling/spam Flag icon Insightful badge Lightbulb icon Funny badge Laughing icon Comments icon

Comments on “Louis Vuitton Loses Trademark Lawsuit Over Joke Bag; Judge Tells Company To Maybe Laugh A Little Rather Than Sue”

Subscribe: RSS Leave a comment
Anonymous Coward says:

Can someone explain WHY anyone would buy an LV bag?

They’re made by child and adult slaves that are tied to conveyor belts in bangladesh. (for their own safety).

Any ’employee’ attempting to escape the facility is simple murdered and the body thrown into nearby landfill.

Who the FUCK would want a bloodstained piece of shit bag sewn together with the tears and blood of children?

And thats not even counting how damn UGLY those bags are…seriously…they look like dollar store shit.

Andrew D. Todd (user link) says:

Re: So Hire An American Craftsman (to: Anonymous Coward, #7)

Louis Viutton’s trademark is just a piece of machine-woven fabric in the end. And it’s not cheap, unless you’re talking about the kind you buy from a street peddler. For the of money the real article costs, you could get an American craftsman to make you a nice leather bag. The man who repairs my boots has a purely local business in bags, belts, etc. Of course, if you find someone who works in the Mexico-Texas tradition of leather-craft, you can get them to make you something, working from your own drawings or photographs, which is entirely your own. Mexican-Texan leather-carving is an authentic folk style, with hundreds of years of tradition behind it. You aren’t paying for marketing and corporate overhead, you are paying for, say, ten or twenty hours of the time of an artist with the swivel-knife, the modeling tool, and the mallet and the bevel and floral stamps. If you are going to spend a couple of thousand dollars on a bag, you should get something for it.

Whatever says:

smh at what Techdirt has become

It is insanely sad and distressing that companies providing high quality goods should now have to worry about judges telling them off simply for enforcing trademarks. This judge has made himself jury and executioner, and ridiculed a corporation for simply exercising their rights. Naturally this means Techdirt supports such a decision. I would post this under my login but since PaulT has taken to logging out to stinky troll me again, I refuse to play according to his uneven playing field.

DannyB (profile) says:

Re: smh at what Techdirt has become

A company that goes after obvious parody is not merely enforcing trademarks.

Are you arguing that others do not get to exercise their right to criticize, parody and otherwise make fun of? Certain speech must be silenced if it offends the delicate sensibilities of a company that has no sense of humor.

The judge did exactly the right thing.

That One Guy (profile) says:

Re: Re: smh at what Techdirt has become

Criticize? Parody? Make fun of?!

The only fair use is paid use, and no-one is allowed to parody a company or their products without permission from the company itself!

Nothing is more important than copyright, patents, and the rights of companies to control what is and is not said about them, that ‘free speech’ crap take a hike, the profits and control of a company over their image and products trumps all!


Add Your Comment

Your email address will not be published.

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here

Comment Options:

Make this the or (get credits or sign in to see balance) what's this?

What's this?

Techdirt community members with Techdirt Credits can spotlight a comment as either the "First Word" or "Last Word" on a particular comment thread. Credits can be purchased at the Techdirt Insider Shop »

Follow Techdirt

Techdirt Daily Newsletter

Techdirt Deals
Techdirt Insider Discord
The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...