If Microsoft Wins Its 'Stupid Patent Of The Month' Lawsuit, Expect A Plague Of Trolls To Move Into Design Patents

from the agonies-of-atomization dept

The recent Techdirt article about Microsoft’s design patent on a slider understandably focused on the absurdity of companies being forced to hand over all of the profits that derive from a product if it is found to have infringed on someone else’s design patent even in just a tiny portion of that product. But there’s another angle worth mentioning here that picks up on something Techdirt has written about several times before: the rise and threat of patent thickets. Back in 2012, it was estimated that 250,000 active patents impacted smartphones. That makes it impossible to build devices without licensing large numbers of patents, and even then, it’s likely that claims of infringement will still be brought.

The underlying problem is that patents were originally devised for a complete, self-standing process or invention. For example, some of the earliest patents were those granted in fifteenth-century Venice for glass making. Over the centuries, invention has become atomized, with smaller and smaller elements being granted patents. These are not, in general, useful on their own, but must be combined with other components to make something useful.

That process of atomization has reached its peak in the world of software, which is typically made up of thousands of smaller software parts. That’s in part why computing has emerged as the field most plagued by patent litigation: if you own a patent on a key element that is required for the other software parts in a product to work properly, you are in a very strong position to force manufacturers to pay you for a license.

The situation described in the Techdirt article about Microsoft’s slider shows that there is a risk that the consequences of atomization in the field of design patents, where even tiny, obvious elements are awarded a patent, could be worse than for “ordinary” utility patents. That’s because of the high level of damages based on the total profits derived from an infringing product, irrespective of the importance of the design element in question. Let’s hope the Supreme Court decides to take this case, and comes out with a sensible ruling that heads off the danger of disproportionate damages. If it doesn’t, we can probably expect trolls to move into the design patent world in a big way — and for real innovation to face even more hurdles than it does at present.

Follow me @glynmoody on Twitter or identi.ca, and +glynmoody on Google+

Filed Under: , , ,
Companies: microsoft

Rate this comment as insightful
Rate this comment as funny
You have rated this comment as insightful
You have rated this comment as funny
Flag this comment as abusive/trolling/spam
You have flagged this comment
The first word has already been claimed
The last word has already been claimed
Insightful Lightbulb icon Funny Laughing icon Abusive/trolling/spam Flag icon Insightful badge Lightbulb icon Funny badge Laughing icon Comments icon

Comments on “If Microsoft Wins Its 'Stupid Patent Of The Month' Lawsuit, Expect A Plague Of Trolls To Move Into Design Patents”

Subscribe: RSS Leave a comment
11 Comments
Lawrence D’Oliveiro says:

I’ve Always Wondered ...

… if the patent owner can claim a share of the profits from the infringing product, does that also mean they are liable for a share of the losses?

After all, if the patented idea is such a key part of the product, then it is a key part for better or for worse.

Or are patent owners like God—they claim credit for the good stuff, but disclaim any liability for the bad stuff?

Anonymous Coward says:

Quite amusing to me. Americans ignored the copyrights and patents of their former parent England when they were building up their country yet now their descendants are determined to stifle that same process that allowed their fledging country to become great and successful.

Amazing how the some people never learn from the mistakes of the past as they are too focused on amassing pointless wealth in the now.

Halle Bally (profile) says:

Is the ribbon interface something to be proud of?

MS suing Corel is like the schoolyard bully intimidating the skinny geek during recess.  “Why don’t you go pick on somebody your own size.”

If one was savvy enough to avoid the dreadful early Windows releases of WordPerfect, it’s always been superior to Word.  Well under the radar, it’s alive & thriving with Version 17–-albeit with a relatively “microscopic” user base.  Perhaps the bonehead lawsuit can bring some well deserved attention to it.

Evidently WP has been a sore spot for MS lo these many years.  Just goes to show how “even a little dog can piss on a big building.”

Add Your Comment

Your email address will not be published.

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here

Comment Options:

Make this the or (get credits or sign in to see balance) what's this?

What's this?

Techdirt community members with Techdirt Credits can spotlight a comment as either the "First Word" or "Last Word" on a particular comment thread. Credits can be purchased at the Techdirt Insider Shop »

Follow Techdirt

Techdirt Daily Newsletter

Techdirt Deals
Techdirt Insider Discord
The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...
Loading...