FCC's Pai Desperately Tries To Pretend He Was Right About Net Neutrality Rules Killing Broadband Investment

from the revolving-door-chicken-littles dept

Before the FCC passed new net neutrality rules, countless ISP consultants, think tankers, and various other sockpuppets desperately proclaimed that the rules would totally destroy the Internet and stifle all network investment. Now months after the rules took effect, everything seems to be operating as it was before — if not better. Google Fiber continues to deploy to a growing number of underserved cities, municipal broadband providers and smaller ISPs continue to push gigabit upgrades, and even Comcast has announced it’s deploying two gigabit service to around 18 million subscribers before the end of the year.

While the broadband industry still suffers from a lack of overall competition, it appears completely unbothered by what many claimed was “draconian regulation for a bygone era” that we were repeatedly told would “utterly crush innovation” and “stifle network investment.” In fact, we’ve seen several instances where the rules already have put big ISPs on their best behavior, most notably on the interconnection front. Granted, numerous ISP execs predicted there’d be no issues, not that anybody heard them under the din of AT&T and Verizon fear mongering.

Of course, these folks can’t just admit they were wrong and were motivated to make shit up to scare people away from net neutrality, so they’re now trying to retroactively claim they were right — despite the total absence of any real evidence. Case in point is FCC Commissioner (and former Verizon regulatory lawyer) Ajit Pai, who this week proclaimed that net neutrality chicken littles were right all along, and the FCC’s use of Title II net neutrality rules has utterly depressed broadband investment:

“As evidence, Pai pointed to research that showed a decline in capital expenditures by the major wireless companies of 12% in the first half of 2015 compared to the same time period in 2014?when the FCC was still expected to restore open Internet rules without reclassifying broadband.

“In my statement dissenting from the Commission?s Title II decision, I warned that ‘[b]roadband networks don?t have to be built. Capital doesn?t have to be invested here,'” Pai said. “‘Risks don?t have to be taken. The more difficult the FCC makes the business case for deployment?and micromanaging everything from interconnection to service plans makes it difficult indeed?the less likely it is that broadband providers big and small will connect Americans with digital opportunities.’ And that I fear is what we are now witnessing.”

Right, except we’re not witnessing that at all. Pai can’t be bothered to show his math, but it appears he pulled the 12% number from a recent editorial by industry-linked think tanker Hal Singer, whose work has been the backbone of a decidedly pointed attempt to mislead the public over the last few weeks. Singer’s the same guy who was widely criticized for manipulating statistics for the broadband industry to help them claim that net neutrality would result in $15 billion in new taxes. You’ll be shocked to learn that most of his worst-case-scenario predictions supporting these numbers show no indication of being true.

In his Forbes editorial, Singer makes these specific claims:

“They said it wouldn?t happen. They offered assurances from three Wall Street analysts, who insisted that Internet service providers (ISPs) would continue to invest at the same levels regardless of the regulatory climate…AT&T?s capital expenditure (capex) was down 29 percent in the first half of 2015 compared to the first half of 2014. Charter?s capex was down by the same percentage. Cablevision?s and Verizon?s capex were down ten and four percent, respectively. CenturyLink?s capex was down nine percent. (Update: The average decline across all wireline ISPs was 12 percent. Including wireless ISPs Sprint and T-Mobile in the sample reduces the average decline to eight percent.)

Except, causality does not equal correlation. If you bother to look at AT&T SEC filings, you’ll note that AT&T already planned to scale back capex because it was already winding up an upgrade initiative dubbed “Project VIP,” which had nothing to do with net neutrality. Indeed, Verizon and AT&T (which comprise the lion’s share of the capex cuts) were already dramatically scaling back their fixed-line network investments, which also had absolutely nothing to do with net neutrality. Charter, meanwhile, just finished up its all-digital network upgrade, and its declines too have nothing to do with net neutrality.

On the wireless side, AT&T and Verizon have acknowledged winding down massive LTE network upgrades, and all of the wireless carriers have been engaged in a little belt-tightening as they deal with the disruptive behavior of T-Mobile. There are about a million reasons for capex cycles, including a lack of competition resulting in muted network upgrades, completed projects, to numerous ISPs in holding patterns as they wait for mergers and acquisitions. But there’s absolutely no data that directly links these capex reductions to net neutrality or the FCC’s implementation of Title II to govern ISPs. And, meanwhile, just a few days before Pai claimed that companies like Verizon were no longer investing in wireless… Verizon announced that it was ramping up its schedule for 5G deployment (the next big upgrade after LTE), which will lead to the next big round of capital expenditure in wireless. So, apparently the new rules did not scare off Verizon — arguably the biggest opponent of net neutrality in the United States.

So basically you’ve got a revolving-door regulator who used to work for the broadband industry, citing statistics from a think tanker with ties to the broadband industry, both hoping that a wish, a dream, some out-of-context data and a little make believe will fool people into thinking these guys weren’t utterly full of crap all along.

Filed Under: , , , , , , , ,
Companies: at&t, verizon

Rate this comment as insightful
Rate this comment as funny
You have rated this comment as insightful
You have rated this comment as funny
Flag this comment as abusive/trolling/spam
You have flagged this comment
The first word has already been claimed
The last word has already been claimed
Insightful Lightbulb icon Funny Laughing icon Abusive/trolling/spam Flag icon Insightful badge Lightbulb icon Funny badge Laughing icon Comments icon

Comments on “FCC's Pai Desperately Tries To Pretend He Was Right About Net Neutrality Rules Killing Broadband Investment”

Subscribe: RSS Leave a comment
Anonymous Coward says:

Thanks for returning to flakking Google Fiber! But the link you give: Phoenix one step closer to Google Fiber" does NOT support that it's growing, just that it MAY.

Wikipedia still has it actually only in Kansas City, Austin, and Provo, plus tiny bit in Palo Alto.

Slow page load? Have to click to see comments the fanboys censored?

Get all the text and none of the ads with the new Techdirt Lite!

Anonymous Coward says:

Re: Thanks for returning to flakking Google Fiber! But the link you give: Phoenix one step closer to Google Fiber" does NOT support that it's growing, just that it MAY.

Thank-you kind sir. Your efforts to help the people of the United States will not go un-noticed. We need more patriots like you in the country.

Most other people have their pet issues where they are emotionally attached and biased. I can see you always put people first in any side you take.

HegemonicDistortion says:

Re: Thanks for returning to flakking Google Fiber! But the link you give: Phoenix one step closer to Google Fiber" does NOT support that it's growing, just that it MAY.

This is deceptively conflating where Google Fiber is actually live versus where they’re deploying it (you know, that thing many of us refer to as investment). They’re actively deploying fiber in several cities right now, including, praise Cthulhu, here in Nashville.

Anonymous Coward says:

i assume their “proof” for this looks something like this
              |  amount invested  |
before nn | $1,000,000,000.000 |
after nn   |            $5             |
               |                           |

ECA (profile) says:

FORCE and Counter force

Forcing a group that has an IDEAL to change, is a PAIN in the Buttox..
The difficulty tends to be what THEY can do to augment/change the numbers..
The problems here, is that the NET can be abused in both Hardware and Software.. The companies can Purposely CRIPPLE themselves just to Force something Worse to happen and say, ‘See, we told ya so’…

Another fun part of this, tends to be DNS..in that Many companies use THEIR OWN DNS..which can route you all over the place to get where you need/want.
Then add in the security/insecurity of our countries Political militaria (FBI, CIA, and other 3-4 letter groups) and a DNS can send you in and out of the Limbo of having every packet Scanned and monitored..

Until you can get a UNBIASED, middle man INSIDE the corp to watch/monitor what is happening…these folks can do ALLOT to mess with people.

That One Guy (profile) says:

Re: Re:

Well if past actions are any indication, they’ll ask for massive tax breaks and/or subsidies in order to ‘upgrade their networks’, spend it all on executive bonuses, then in a few years pay off a few politicians so they don’t need to hold up their end of the original deal, all the while claiming that no-one actually needs higher speeds anyway.

Add Your Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here

Comment Options:

Make this the or (get credits or sign in to see balance) what's this?

What's this?

Techdirt community members with Techdirt Credits can spotlight a comment as either the "First Word" or "Last Word" on a particular comment thread. Credits can be purchased at the Techdirt Insider Shop »

Follow Techdirt

Techdirt Daily Newsletter

Techdirt Deals
Techdirt Insider Discord
The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...
Older Stuff
05:30 Survey Shows Majority Of GOP Voters Support Restoring Net Neutrality (31)
06:25 Big Telecom Finally Ends Quest To Stop States From Protecting Broadband Consumers (35)
05:56 Big Telecom's Quest To Ban States From Protecting Broadband Consumers Continues To Go... Poorly (13)
12:15 Courts (Again) Shoot Down Telecom Lobby's Attempt To Kill State-Level Net Neutrality Rules (5)
04:48 Dumb Telecom Take Of The Week: Because The Internet Didn't Explode, Killing Net Neutrality Must Not Have Mattered (23)
09:37 British Telecom Wants Netflix To Pay A Tax Simply Because Squid Game Is Popular (32)
04:55 Axios Parrots A Lot Of Dumb, Debunked Nonsense About Net Neutrality (54)
10:50 NY AG Proves Broadband Industry Funded Phony Public Support For Attack On Net Neutrality (10)
06:24 The GOP Is Using Veterans As Props To Demonize Net Neutrality (22)
06:03 Telecom Using Veterans As Props To Demonize California's New Net Neutrality Law (12)
09:32 AT&T Whines That California Net Neutrality Rules Are Forcing It To Behave (11)
06:23 The New York Times (Falsely) Informs Its 7 Million Readers Net Neutrality Is 'Pointless' (51)
15:34 Facebook's Australian News Ban Did Demonstrate The Evil Of Zero Rating (18)
04:58 'Net Neutrality Hurt Internet Infrastructure Investment' Is The Bad Faith Lie That Simply Won't Die (11)
05:48 Dumb New GOP Talking Point: If You Restore Net Neutrality, You HAVE To Kill Section 230. Just Because! (66)
06:31 DOJ Drops Ridiculous Trump-Era Lawsuit Against California For Passing Net Neutrality Rules (13)
06:27 The Wall Street Journal Kisses Big Telecom's Ass In Whiny Screed About 'Big Tech' (13)
10:45 New Interim FCC Boss Jessica Rosenworcel Will Likely Restore Net Neutrality, Just Not Yet (5)
15:30 Small Idaho ISP 'Punishes' Twitter And Facebook's 'Censorship' ... By Blocking Access To Them Entirely (81)
05:29 A Few Reminders Before The Tired Net Neutrality Debate Is Rekindled (13)
06:22 U.S. Broadband Speeds Jumped 90% in 2020. But No, It Had Nothing To Do With Killing Net Neutrality. (12)
12:10 FCC Ignores The Courts, Finalizes Facts-Optional Repeal Of Net Neutrality (19)
10:46 It's Opposite Day At The FCC: Rejects All Its Own Legal Arguments Against Net Neutrality To Claim It Can Be The Internet Speech Police (13)
12:05 Blatant Hypocrite Ajit Pai Decides To Move Forward With Bogus, Unconstitutional Rulemaking On Section 230 (178)
06:49 FCC's Pai Puts Final Bullet In Net Neutrality Ahead Of Potential Demotion (25)
06:31 The EU Makes It Clear That 'Zero Rating' Violates Net Neutrality (6)
06:22 DOJ Continues Its Quest To Kill Net Neutrality (And Consumer Protection In General) In California (11)
11:08 Hypocritical AT&T Makes A Mockery Of Itself; Says 230 Should Be Reformed For Real Net Neutrality (28)
06:20 Trump, Big Telecom Continue Quest To Ban States From Protecting Broadband Consumers (19)
06:11 Senators Wyden And Markey Make It Clear AT&T Is Violating Net Neutrality (13)
More arrow