Whistleblowers Band Together To Sue FBI, NSA And DOJ For Malicious Prosecution, Civil Liberties Violations

from the jury-trial-request-will-never-be-obliged,-that's-for-sure dept

This should be fun. A bunch of whistleblowers that were hounded, surveilled and prosecuted/persecuted by the US government are banding together to sue all the big names in domestic surveillance.

Thomas Drake, Diane Roark, Ed Loomis, J. Kirk Wiebe and William Binney have filed a civil rights lawsuit against the NSA, FBI, DOJ, Michael Hayden, Keith Alexander, Chris Inglis, Robert Mueller and a handful of others. They will be represented by Larry Klayman, who has some experience suing intelligence agencies.

The claims arise from the government’s treatment of these whistleblowers after they started making noise about the NSA’s surveillance programs. More specifically, the lawsuit points to the short-lived internet surveillance program THINTHREAD, which was ignored and abandoned in favor of something more expensive, but less protective of Americans’ communications.

Plaintiffs worked in various roles on developing and perfecting a candidate program called THINTHREAD which was capable of performing the technical work desired by the NSA for surveillance of the internet efficiently, effectively, and at very low cost.

THINTHREAD was put into operation successfully but only on a demonstration basis. It was approved to demonstrate that it worked, but not officially commissioned for actual operational use.

Despite the Plaintiffs demonstrating that THINTHREAD actually worked, the NSA ignored THINTHREAD as a candidate for performing the desired surveillance of the internet and telephone communications, because THINTHREAD was inexpensive and highly effective, yet Lt. General Michael Hayden had made a corporate decision to “buy” externally rather than “build” internally the solution deemed necessary to harvest internet data.

$4 billion went into another program called TRAILBLAZER (THINTHREAD’s internal development cost, by contrast, was only $4 MILLION), along with five years of development. In the end, TRAILBLAZER never worked properly and was abandoned by the NSA in 2006.

This wasteful “funneling” of funds to preferred government contractors was reported to the Dept. of Defense by four of the whistleblowers, under the heading of waste, fraud and misuse of taxpayers’ money. The DoD wasn’t happy. It issued a scathing internal report. But the NSA wasn’t interested in having its faults pointed out. It sent the DOJ after the whistleblowers, using an unrelated leak of information about the NSA’s expansive domestic surveillance programs to the New York Times as the impetus for a series of raids.

According to the filing, the raids were retaliatory. The government had already determined the plaintiffs had nothing to do with the leaks reported on by the New York Times. And it used faulty affidavits to justify the corresponding raids.

In fact, the affidavit for the search warrants are themselves based upon an illegal, warrantless phone tap and refer to a conversation illegally intercepted between Plaintiff Roark and Plaintiff William Binney, although misrepresenting the call’s contents. Further, the ultimate pretext for the search, a paper describing THINTHREAD at a high level that Binney had given the FBI, was falsely claimed by NSA to be classified. Thus, the search warrant affidavit is not only false but illegal.

The lawsuit also attempts to use the breadth and reach of known surveillance programs as proof the government knew the whistleblowers had nothing to do with the NYT leak.

Moreover, as later revealed by Edward Snowden, the NSA was even then, with the assistance of cooperating telephone and telecommunications companies, conducting mass interception and surveillance of all telephone calls within the domestic United States for the very purpose – at least so they claimed – of detecting both external and internal threats against the national security of the United States.

Therefore, through those phone and internet records, the Defendants had actual evidence at the time of the false affidavit and retaliatory searches and seizures that none of the Plaintiffs had communicated with the The New York Times or other journalists, except that Plaintiff Drake on his own had spoken confidentially with regard to public and /or unclassified information to the Baltimore Sun.

The end result of the FBI, NSA and DOJ’s actions in response to whistleblowing (largely performed through proper channels) is a host of alleged civil liberties violations and other abuses, starting with the violation of 1998’s Whistleblower Protection Act. From there, the whistleblowers allege violations of their First, Fourth and Fifth Amendment rights, along with malicious prosecution, intentional infliction of emotional distress and abuse of process.

It will be interesting to see where this goes. The government likely won’t be able to dismiss the suit quickly, but the plaintiffs are going to run into a ton of immunity claims that will be buttressed by invocations of national security concerns. Their lawyer — Larry Klayman — has occasionally displayed his inability to distinguish between actionable claims and conspiracy theories, a tendency that doesn’t improve the plaintiffs’ chances of succeeding. But of all the outcomes I imagined for the stories of Drake, Binney, et al, taking these agencies on directly in federal court wasn’t one of them.

Filed Under: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Rate this comment as insightful
Rate this comment as funny
You have rated this comment as insightful
You have rated this comment as funny
Flag this comment as abusive/trolling/spam
You have flagged this comment
The first word has already been claimed
The last word has already been claimed
Insightful Lightbulb icon Funny Laughing icon Abusive/trolling/spam Flag icon Insightful badge Lightbulb icon Funny badge Laughing icon Comments icon

Comments on “Whistleblowers Band Together To Sue FBI, NSA And DOJ For Malicious Prosecution, Civil Liberties Violations”

Subscribe: RSS Leave a comment
Anonymous Coward says:

what a shame the most famous recent names aren’t (able) involved as well. considering how the government stated it would protect whistleblowers, they soon ignored their own statements are threw these two under the bus, to the wolves, over the side and everywhere else possible to try to stop them from informing the public and be able to shut them up for good!

Anonymous Coward says:

Based on previous examples

So long as they have the networks prepared to capture the infiltration that we all know will happen, this could easily hand the government their ass. We already know that anyone who dares point out the hypocrisy and lies that our government spews and claims to have proof*, quickly finds their networks and personal lives under a fine tooth comb. Of the people, By the people and for the people*.

* Your Rights are subject to confiscation and annulment on a case by case basis.
* People in this case applies only to those who have already been notified.

JB Smith (profile) says:

Virginia state police and no touch torture with biochip implant

The American Reinvestment and Recovery Act and the brain initiative are the worst scams ever perpetrated on the American people. Former U. S. Surgeon General Regina Benjamin Warns: Biochips Hazardous to Your Health: Warning, biochips may cause behavioral changes and high suicide rates. State Attorney Generals are to revoke the licenses of doctors and dentists that implant chips in patients. Chip used illegally for GPS, tracking, organized crime, communication and torture. Virginia state police have been implanting citizens without their knowledge and consent for years and they are dying! Check out William and Mary’s site to see the torture enabled by the biochip and the Active Denial System. See Terrorism and Mental Health by Amin Gadit or A Note on Uberveillance by MG & Katina Michael or Safeguards in a World of Ambient Intelligence by Springer or Mind Control, Microchip Implants and Cybernetics. Check out the audio spotlight by Holosonics.

“Former Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) director and now Google Executive, Regina E. Dugan, has unveiled a super small, ingestible microchip that we can all be expected to swallow by 2017. “A means of authentication,” she calls it, also called an electronic tattoo, which takes NSA spying to whole new levels. She talks of the ‘mechanical mismatch problem between machines and humans,’ and specifically targets 10 – 20 year olds in her rant about the wonderful qualities of this new technology that can stretch in the human body and still be functional. Hailed as a ‘critical shift for research and medicine,’ these biochips would not only allow full access to insurance companies and government agencies to our pharmaceutical med-taking compliancy (or lack thereof), but also a host of other aspects of our lives which are truly none of their business, and certainly an extension of the removal of our freedoms and rights.” Google News

The ARRA authorizes payments to the states in an effort to encourage Medicaid Providers to adopt and use “certified EHR technology” aka biochips. ARRA will match Medicaid $5 for every $1 a state provides. Hospitals are paid $2 million to create “crisis stabilization wards” (Gitmo’s) where state police torture people – even unto death. They stopped my heart 90 times in 6 hours. Virginia Beach EMT’s were called to the scene.
Mary E. Schloendorff, v. The Society of New York Hospital 105 N. E. 92, 93 (N. Y. 1914) Justice Cardozo states, “every human being of adult years and sound mind has a right to determine what shall be done with his own body; and a surgeon who performs an operation without his patient’s consent, commits an assault, for which he is liable in damages. (Pratt v Davis, 224 Ill. 300; Mohr v Williams, 95 Minn. 261.)

This case precedent requires police to falsely arrest you or kidnap you and call you a mental health patient in order to force the implant on you. You can also be forced to have a biochip if you have an infectious disease – like Eboli or Aids. Coalition of Justice vs the City of Hampton, VA settled a case out of court for $500,000 and removal of the biochip. Torture is punishable by $1,000 per day up to $2 million; Medical battery is worth $2.05 million.

They told my family it was the brain initiative. This requires informed, knowledgeable consent. Mark Warner told me it was research with the Active Denial System by the College of William and Mary, the USAF, and state and local law enforcement. It is called IBEX and it is excruciating. If you are an organ donor, they volunteer you.

Personanongrata says:

Baby Steps

Whistleblowers Band Together To Sue FBI, NSA And DOJ For Malicious Prosecution, Civil Liberties Violations

Better late than never.

Once again, a hearty thanks to Winter Patriot Edward Snowden for without his sacrifices in freeing the truth from US government captivity this lawsuit would never have been possible.

Snowden and Manning 2016.

Pronounce (profile) says:

It's Impossible to Wrestle the Power Away From the Power Brokers

Those unelected officials, that hold the power of the political machine, can not, will not, tolerate whistleblowers, because it upsets their system. In the end the government will be the machine it is and drag this stuff out for years, maybe a decade or more, and then give them a fraction of tax dollars to cover the expenses, time, and mental anguish it took to make their case.

The American political system is a power-broker’s paradise.

GEMont (profile) says:

Re: It's Impossible to Wrestle the Power Away From the Power Brokers

…the government will be the machine it is and drag this stuff out for years…

Actually, it is just as likely that the Feds will buy off the judges, or hold all hearings behind closed doors, in order to get this whole thing over with ASAP, as an open and shut case using “national Security” justifications, to eliminate the chance of the public becoming interested enough to pay attention between commercials and opening beers.

The last thing the Power Boys need right now is an informed American citizenry looking up the deeds of whistleblowers and becoming aware of how the USG has been acting like an Immature Ancient Chinese Emperor in response to the deeds of these people, when it should be awarding them medals of valor for their bravery and true patriotism.

Currently, most of the names on that list are utter unknowns to the general American population, and the Feds would definitely prefer that things stay that way.

A prolonged public court case would make far too many people take note and become aware of the situation, and that is not desired by the USG at all.

Mz. Donna Joy Plattner says:

Speaking out loud....

Hello, I am Donna Joy and I am a human subject from Omaha Nebraska. I have reached out to lot of good people all over the World. For the Covert Electronic Harassment and Surveillance Program/Project is almost world-wide. Oh did we forget to tell you that there is one or two countries that aren’t part of this targeting so it’s not World-wide but yet it’s all around the world!
I have signed so many, many petition’s and joined more than a handful of ” Covert Electronic Harassment and Surveillance and Gang Stalking” Lawsuit’s. I feel, that I have a ball & chain at my ankle as for the many, many hours, I spend here at my computer doing my research, looking for answers to the targeting spending hours digging and searching for any kind of hope, A glimpse of light God I pray! Looking to open door’s and shut door’s at the same time. Maybe I am a Activist but I alright with that because if looking for the truth and looking for answers… which is important to me as it is to others! We need to reach out to others and keep fighting for right and wrong! The Covert Electronic Harassment and Surveillance Program’s (no matter what phase you’re in) is wrong!It will never end unless WE THE PEOPLE stand together in unity and fight for our Human Right’s as well, as for our dignity and honor plus pride and what our families have been put through!

Your Sister in Christ,
Mz. Donna Joy Plattner
4544 Nicholas St. Apt.4#
Omaha Nebraska,68132
United States of America
Aug.26th. 2015


I have Government informant;s hacking at m,y computer & tampering with my phone… Your call could be rerouted, someone could be listening to our conversation, Someone could pretend to be me or impersonate someone else on the telephone line.

GEMont (profile) says:

Moderated again!


Tried three times to post a response to;

“Pronounce (profile), Aug 25th, 2015 @ 1:09pm”

Twice as GEMont and once anonymously and all three were held for moderation, so they either have my computer ID tagged, or somewhere in that string of words is a Verboten keyword that causes a post to undergo close moderator scrutiny here at techdirt.

Since there was no mention of child sex, bombs or assassinations of prominent assholes in that post and the techdirt staff do not respond to inquiries about why a post was held for moderation, I can only guess that techdirt is becoming less and less the open forum it once was.

C’est la vie eh. Under fascism all freedoms must be curtailed for the good of the parasites.

Now to see if this one gets flagged as well. 🙂

GEMont (profile) says:

Moderated Again part 2

OK it was definitely some word string that caused the moderator bot to trigger.

I tried to post a correction to my original Wowsers post, and include the banned text, and it was also flagged for moderation.

Just in case the “correction post” does not get posted – the correction was:

The original “flagged for moderation post” was in response to:

“Frannie Cohan, Aug 25th, 2015 @ 5:49pm”

I had mistakenly posted that it was to;

“Pronounce (profile), Aug 25th, 2015 @ 1:09pm”

Crazy shit man.

I’m gonna try an experiment.

Post the forbidden message in parts as Anonymous Coward, and see which part gets the moderator bot all steamy.

You folks can just skip over these.

GEMont (profile) says:

Silly Robot

Well, the Verboten Words apparently no longer cause a censor-bot spasm.

I figgered it was the combination of the word “eliminate”, possibly meaning “kill” and the word “human”, possibly meaning “person”, that triggered the bot, originally.

And while these Awesome Powerful Dangerous words no longer trigger the thing, my origial post is still being held hostage by the Moderator, even though it is reproduced (in whole now) in the four parts posts.

What a silly waste of time this is, on a site that is supposed to be user moderated.

Did techdirt hire a new Director of Approved Wording??

Is anyone else out there in techdirt poster-land having these problems with the censor bot??

Redirection to “The Page Cannot Be Displayed” pages, during post previews?

Techdirt daily not showing up in email for a couple days??

Editor wonking out and replacing <> and “” type characters with weird alternate character shit?

Just curious.


Add Your Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here

Comment Options:

Make this the or (get credits or sign in to see balance) what's this?

What's this?

Techdirt community members with Techdirt Credits can spotlight a comment as either the "First Word" or "Last Word" on a particular comment thread. Credits can be purchased at the Techdirt Insider Shop »

Follow Techdirt

Techdirt Daily Newsletter

Techdirt Deals
Techdirt Insider Discord
The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...