Cable Industry Still Proudly Thinks Cord Cutting Is A Media-Manufactured Crisis

from the denial-is-not-just-a-river-in-Egypt dept

A few years ago, if you asked cable and broadcast executives if cord cutting was real, most of them would proudly declare that it was a complete and total phantom (like Yeti). The few that could admit to the trend would usually try to argue that the only people engaged in this kind of behavior were losers not worthy of their consideration when contemplating their business models. Of course data has emerged since suggesting that not only is cord cutting very real (albeit slow), the people doing it are affluent, educated, and right in cable’s key future target demographic.

These days, most cable and broadcast executives, after slowly hemorrhaging basic cable subscribers for several years and watching broadcast TV ratings drop through the floor, will at least admit that cord cutting is real. But there’s still a strong contingent among them that desperately wants to believe that cord cutting is a media-manufactured phenomenon and that their beautiful legacy cash cow will somehow live forever. The latest case in point comes via a Fortune article that explains “Why Cord Cutting Is a Myth” without actually doing anything of the sort:

“The way content is consumed is changing,? said Amy Banse, managing director of Comcast Ventures. ?We?re all aware of that. But I personally believe, and also by looking at our own statistics, that the volume of press around cord cutting doesn?t quite match reality.”

Again though, Banse doesn’t offer any data to support the argument that cord cutting is a mass media hallucination. Factoring cable’s failure to scale with new housing growth as the housing market recovered, telecom analyst Craig Moffett (who used to deny cord cutting) notes the pay TV business lost 1.4 million subscribers in the last year. The pay TV industry saw its first net subscriber loss during the first quarter of this year, and the industry is contracting at a 0.5% annual rate. This is before you factor in that many people aren’t “cutting the cord” — they’re not signing up for traditional cable in the first place. And all of this is hitting cable and broadcast ratings hard. Comcast’s recent earnings say the company lost 69,000 basic video subscribers last quarter and 3 million over the last six years.

These are measurable metrics — some small, some not so small. All important, and none imagined.

Still, to hear the cable industry tell it, cord cutting is “over-reported”:

“George Kliavkoff, president of Hearst Ventures, agreed, and said the topic is low-hanging fruit for the media: ?Cord-cutting is a great ?story,?? he said. ?But I think it?s over-reported.? What?s more likely to gain sizable traction, he said, is cord ?shaving,? where consumers simply move away from all-encompassing multichannel packages. ?A la carte purchasing of channels?and not taking most of them?is a far more interesting area,? he said.

The second half of that argument could certainly be true. “Cord shaving” or “cord cheating” is also occurring at an increased rate as cable customers socked with bi-annual rate hikes look for any opportunity to cut their monthly bill. Eventually, these users will also likely be turning their gaze toward redundant cable voice services, forcing cable operators to replace that revenue in new and “creative” ways. This is all part of one conversation. And while yes, some media outlets do overhype cord cutting without nuance or context (as happens with all things), how the media explains what’s happening is a distraction. The focus should be on how the cable and broadband industry is failing to adapt to internet video through its refusal to offer truly evolutionary products and pricing.

Some of this is semantics. Some cable execs simply don’t like to call it “cord cutting,” given there’s still a cord — it just happens to be broadband only. But whatever you call it, the answer to all of these problems has a single unified answer. With 2015’s rise in new internet video options, cable’s going to have to do the one thing it has spent a generation refusing to do: compete on price.

Filed Under: , , , ,
Companies: comcast

Rate this comment as insightful
Rate this comment as funny
You have rated this comment as insightful
You have rated this comment as funny
Flag this comment as abusive/trolling/spam
You have flagged this comment
The first word has already been claimed
The last word has already been claimed
Insightful Lightbulb icon Funny Laughing icon Abusive/trolling/spam Flag icon Insightful badge Lightbulb icon Funny badge Laughing icon Comments icon

Comments on “Cable Industry Still Proudly Thinks Cord Cutting Is A Media-Manufactured Crisis”

Subscribe: RSS Leave a comment
39 Comments
milk em dry says:

” people doing it are affluent, educated, and right in cable’s key future target demographic”

Other than those born into wealthy families, regular folks become well-off by being smart and thrifty. Why be bilked for some services that are not basic necessities, like food and water? Unless you’re those who value entertainment over life itself. Those people do exist though.

Anonymous Coward says:

I'll tell you why...

Again though, Banse doesn’t offer any data to support the argument that cord cutting is a mass media hallucination.

Because he uses subscriber info, not usage info. Internet by itself is so prohibitively expensive (thanks, Cable Cartels!) that a lot of people will sign up for internet + TV, but will only use the internet part. He doesn’t care about that second part (they only use internet) – he’s only looking at the first bit (they signed up for internet + TV).

Anonymous Coward says:

How much do you want to bet that Obama and the Democrats will try to pass a bill that requires Americans to purchase cable TV service under the guise of the Interstate Commerce Act. Like what they did with Obamacare and that the president is planning on adding even more mandated purchases for people living in the country.

Roger Strong (profile) says:

Re: Re:

Because like with healthcare, everyone will eventually require cable.

And many Americans are being bankrupted because they can’t afford cable.

And when they require emergency cable and can’t afford it, the rest of us end up paying for it.

And because cable is the same sort of life-or-death issue as healthcare.

Actually, I can easily see cable and broadcast executives making exactly these arguments. And the Cruz/Palin/Santorum “Hee Haw meets 28 Days Later” crowd believing them too.

Roger Strong (profile) says:

Re: Re: Re: Re:

It’s also worth mentioning that Obamacare’s individual mandate emerged from the far-right Heritage Foundation. (Which now backs Ted Cruz.) It was about paying your own way, rather than making everyone else pay for your healthcare.

It was backed by Republicans from Bob Dole to Newt Gingrich to Jim DeMint to Mitt Romney and many, many more. It was mainstream Republican healthcare policy for 15 years, becoming commie Marxist socialism only in the instant that Obama adopted it.

Erik says:

Cord cutting is certainly happening but some of the millennial cordnever numbers are due to the fact that something like 30% of millennials live at home with their parents and watch TV (who are paying for cable).

FWIW, an MVPD with an addressable digital set top box has way better consumption numbers than Nielsen or any of the publicly available TV rating services. They are not doing some idiotic audio watermark read of a sample. They know exactly what set top box IP addresses are watching exactly what programming at a second by second resolution.

Andrew (profile) says:

I’ve had no TV service since 2004, except for a 3 month period in 2006 (issues with Charter). That might not sound that notable except for one thing – my wife’s worked for DirecTV since November, and as part of her compensation, we’re eligable for a Genie system and programming, free. We don’t have it.

In fact, until christmas, all our TV sets were in the 14-19″ range and from the late 90s, mainly used to play the Wii with, or my DVD player (haven’t had that hooked up in over a year, haven’t bought a DVD in 6-7 years), but we were given a 50″ smart TV at christmas, which we use to watch netflix on, and occasionally youtube (and sometimes pandora, and every now and then, play the wii)

I could get programing, free, I just don’t want it.

Ninja (profile) says:

Re: Re:

I could get programing, free, I just don’t want it.

It’s mostly not worth it. When you do want to watch something it’s usually in a time you aren’t home or you need to sleep and if you want the option to record it and watch later you have to pay a premium for it. Netflix on the other hand delivers content whenever you want and that’s a huge benefit. Not to mention they are producing and offering quality stuff even if the MAFIAA is trying hard to prevent them from having their content.

I also stopped going to the cinema (noisy, crowded, bad popcorn) but we (me and my girl) were wondering how awesome would it be to watch a movie that was in the cinema at home. I mean give money they wouldn’t be earning otherwise. But then again we can’t. And I don’t really care enough to go pirate these days.

Anonymous Coward says:

I don’t have a problem with whether they believe this or not. I made my decision a long time ago. I’ve never looked back nor do I regret in any manner that decision.

The latest trend seems to be lets make bundles that include the internet connection so we can hide those vanishing. Nearly all of them are doing this in some manner. It hides the fact the customers are disappearing by saying look we have this bundle package that includes internet and every one is on it.

New households are not wiring up. Old households are dropping the services of PPV. I do not want a tv. I’ve had enough of the stupid programming reduced to the lowest common denominator. I’ve had enough of programs that appear to be the excuse to serve commercials.

I did not realize how bone jarring commercials were until I removed them from my life. The peace without them is well worth terminating tv in it’s various forms.

JBDragon says:

I cut the cord over 3 years ago and haven’t looked back! I had Comcast for around 18 years paying for CableTV first until they finally offered Internet service and I got that. But with prices going up, up, up and nothing left to cut, I had enough. I don’t want or need 100+ channels,m but to get that 1 channel yo want, you end up having to get the Big channel package and they know it and set it up this way.

I had enough of that. When I got my house I got U-Verse for Internet only and threw up a large Antenna for my TV. The price has since jumped up way to much for the speed I was getting so I just switched back to Comcast for Internet ONLY. Most of my TV I get from the Antenna. Most in HD and 5.1 surround. I just switched from Media center setup to a TiVo Roamio and Tivo Mini’s because media center is going away in Windows 10.

This allows me to watch programs when I want to watch them and allows me to skip commercials. I can start watching in one room and continue in another. It’s a great setup with the Tivo units. For the few shows I miss like AMC’s “The Walking Dead” I can get a season pass in SD which is good enough for my needs and watch the new episodes the day after they air and commercial free. A few season passes is a drop in the bucket of my savings. Netflix and Amazon Prime I had for a long time including when I was paying for CableTV, so I don’t really consider them a extra expense. Lots of great content on Netflix. The original programming is great. Lots of good shows if you just spend a little time looking around.

Violynne (profile) says:

But I personally believe, and also by looking at our own statistics, that the volume of press around cord cutting doesn’t quite match reality.

That’s because Comcast rapes the wallets of damn near every customer it has by forcing them to “bundle” their “internet services” making it such that the bundle is far cheaper than a stand alone internet connection.

Claiming cord cutting isn’t happening while forcing people to pay for the cord is absolutely the most arrogant thing an ISP can say.

Anonymous Coward says:

I wonder if the entertainment industry will ever realize that if the build it we will come.

If I could get a service that let me watch ANYTHING that is available I would pay at least $50 a month over my internet bill. For that price I would even be willing to deal with some (not continuous) commercials. If there was a service that let me watch ANYTHING, ANYWHERE, with a very nice interface, search feature, parental controls, and anything else a consumer would want, I could see myself paying at least $100 a month. That is from a cord cutter. I have no interest in paying that kind of money for a service that provides an extremely limited selection of entertainment, that I have to watch at a specific time or deal with a DVR.

If the cable industry had done thing right they would have moved on demand services to both broadcasting and broadband. Expanded those services as quickly as they could, and done everything they could to move people over to the broadband service. If the had been first and kept people in there system they could have built in commercials to the new services and no one would have complained (well not too much). They simply have not kept up with technology and now they are going to catch up and survive amongst the competition, or die.

JoeT says:

I'm not quite a cord cutter

In my anger and my shame, I’m not a cord cutter. I have cable TV.

However, that’s only because 1) I *need* internet, and Comcast is the only game in town besides dialup, and 2) the HOA pays for basic cable as part of the HOA fee.

When I signed up and activated the account, I confused the poor tech on the other side of the phone to no end. “Can you tune to channel 17″…. “No I can’t, my TV is in box somewhere; can you just activate my internet?” It took us 2 months before we even bothered unpacking the TV, and that was just to watch DVDs and streaming on the larger display. We only called Comcast back to activate the TV when we wanted to watch the Thanksgiving parades and football, another 2 months later. Again, the tech was very confused that we’d been paying them for 4 months without ever having set up the TV.

It isn’t so much cord cutting as it is not giving a s**t about TV. I can get massive variety of video entertainment, on demand, on my terms, and from cheap to free, on my computer. We watch far more Netflix than we do TV….. and far more Youtube than Netflix.

I didn’t cut the cord… I just didn’t care enough to bother unpacking it.

Peter (profile) says:

With affordable internet access, cord cutting becomes real

it’s not as though the cable companies were ever delivering something truly wonderful — just third-rate programming fraught with ads.

I cast off Comcast when I found a low-cost internet provider, and now watch far better content with far fewer ads, thanks to Hulu, Amazon, Netflix, Sling TV, YouTube, Crackle, et al. Plus, I’m saving nearly $100 a month. I only wish I had made the move sooner.

Bruno (profile) says:

Cord cutting will stun the industry-- just you watch

Here’s the thing — lots of people have thought about cord cutting, but they don’t really know how to go about it. Once they figure out it’s as easy as a Roku box and a few downloaded apps, and they can enjoy high def shows directly on their TV… Well, you might see them question why they pay $200+ a month (in the Bay Area) to Comcast for crappy content constantly interrupted by ads. That’s right, they fork over all that dough only to be rewarded by an ever rising flood of commercials. Who in his right mind is willing to put up with that?

tqk (profile) says:

Re: Cord cutting will stun the industry-- just you watch

Well, you might see them question why they pay $200+ a month (in the Bay Area) to Comcast for crappy content constantly interrupted by ads.

I just go to a library and check out music CDs, DVD movies, and books. No ads (that a fast forward won’t get past). I don’t understand why cable TV continues to sell, other than inertia. They’re relying on their customers to remain ignorant. How long can that last?

Add Your Comment

Your email address will not be published.

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here

Comment Options:

Make this the or (get credits or sign in to see balance) what's this?

What's this?

Techdirt community members with Techdirt Credits can spotlight a comment as either the "First Word" or "Last Word" on a particular comment thread. Credits can be purchased at the Techdirt Insider Shop »

Follow Techdirt

Techdirt Daily Newsletter

Techdirt Deals
Techdirt Insider Discord
The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...
Loading...
Older Stuff
09:32 AT&T Whines That California Net Neutrality Rules Are Forcing It To Behave (11)
06:23 The New York Times (Falsely) Informs Its 7 Million Readers Net Neutrality Is 'Pointless' (51)
15:34 Facebook's Australian News Ban Did Demonstrate The Evil Of Zero Rating (18)
04:58 'Net Neutrality Hurt Internet Infrastructure Investment' Is The Bad Faith Lie That Simply Won't Die (11)
05:48 Dumb New GOP Talking Point: If You Restore Net Neutrality, You HAVE To Kill Section 230. Just Because! (66)
06:31 DOJ Drops Ridiculous Trump-Era Lawsuit Against California For Passing Net Neutrality Rules (13)
06:27 The Wall Street Journal Kisses Big Telecom's Ass In Whiny Screed About 'Big Tech' (13)
10:45 New Interim FCC Boss Jessica Rosenworcel Will Likely Restore Net Neutrality, Just Not Yet (5)
15:30 Small Idaho ISP 'Punishes' Twitter And Facebook's 'Censorship' ... By Blocking Access To Them Entirely (81)
05:29 A Few Reminders Before The Tired Net Neutrality Debate Is Rekindled (13)
06:22 U.S. Broadband Speeds Jumped 90% in 2020. But No, It Had Nothing To Do With Killing Net Neutrality. (12)
12:10 FCC Ignores The Courts, Finalizes Facts-Optional Repeal Of Net Neutrality (19)
10:46 It's Opposite Day At The FCC: Rejects All Its Own Legal Arguments Against Net Neutrality To Claim It Can Be The Internet Speech Police (13)
12:05 Blatant Hypocrite Ajit Pai Decides To Move Forward With Bogus, Unconstitutional Rulemaking On Section 230 (178)
06:49 FCC's Pai Puts Final Bullet In Net Neutrality Ahead Of Potential Demotion (25)
06:31 The EU Makes It Clear That 'Zero Rating' Violates Net Neutrality (6)
06:22 DOJ Continues Its Quest To Kill Net Neutrality (And Consumer Protection In General) In California (11)
11:08 Hypocritical AT&T Makes A Mockery Of Itself; Says 230 Should Be Reformed For Real Net Neutrality (28)
06:20 Trump, Big Telecom Continue Quest To Ban States From Protecting Broadband Consumers (19)
06:11 Senators Wyden And Markey Make It Clear AT&T Is Violating Net Neutrality (13)
06:31 Net Neutrali-what? AT&T's New Streaming Service Won't Count Against Its Broadband Caps. But Netflix Will. (25)
06:23 Telecom's Latest Dumb Claim: The Internet Only Works During A Pandemic Because We Killed Net Neutrality (49)
13:36 Ex-FCC Staffer Says FCC Authority Given Up In Net Neutrality Repeal Sure Would Prove Handy In A Crisis (13)
06:27 Clarence Thomas Regrets Brand X Decision That Paved Way For The Net Neutrality Wars (11)
06:17 The FCC To Field More Comments On Net Neutrality. Maybe They'll Stop Identity Theft And Fraud This Time? (79)
08:56 AT&T, Comcast Dramatically Cut Network Spending Despite Net Neutrality Repeal (16)
06:18 Ajit Pai Hits CES... To Make Up Some Shit About Net Neutrality (24)
06:24 Mozilla, Consumer Groups Petition For Rehearing of Net Neutrality Case (22)
06:49 AT&T Exec Insists That No Broadband Company Is Violating Net Neutrality Even Though AT&T Is Absolutely Violating Net Neutrality (19)
06:45 Shocker: ISPs Cut Back 2020 Investment Despite Tax Breaks, Death Of Net Neutrality (61)
More arrow