FBI Spied On Activists Because Protecting Corporate Interests Is Roughly Equivalent To Ensuring National Security

from the our-disregarded-internal-policies-trump-your-First-Amendment-rights dept

That whole thing about the FBI not surveilling people based solely on First Amendment activity? The thing that’s been in all the (FISA) papers (and agency policies)? Yeah, the FBI hasn’t heard of it either.

The FBI breached its own internal rules when it spied on campaigners against the Keystone XL pipeline, failing to get approval before it cultivated informants and opened files on individuals protesting against the construction of the pipeline in Texas, documents reveal.

Internal agency documents show for the first time how FBI agents have been closely monitoring anti-Keystone activists, in violation of guidelines designed to prevent the agency from becoming unduly involved in sensitive political issues.

“Unduly involved” is right. First of all, a majority of what was monitored was First Amendment activity, something no federal intelligence or investigative agency is supposed to be doing. Certainly, there can be law enforcement monitoring of protests as they occur, but there’s no provision in the law that allows the FBI to monitor people solely because of their activism.

Unless, of course, these activists are declared “extremists.” Then all bets (and Constitutional protections) are off.

“Many of these extremists believe the debates over pollution, protection of wildlife, safety, and property rights have been overshadowed by the promise of jobs and cheaper oil prices,” the FBI document states.

“Extremists” are often mentioned in the same breath as “domestic terrorists,” so with a little bit of rebranding, the FBI is now able to surveill people solely for their First Amendment-protected activities. That’s handy and not totally unexpected, given the agency’s long history of eyeballing activists who run contrary to its view on How Things Should Be. At one point, it was uppity blacks and encroaching homosexuals. Now, it’s people who don’t want an oil pipeline running through their neighborhoods.

And, even though we know the FBI has clearly taken a stance on controversial issues in the past and shaped its surveillance activities accordingly, it’s rather jarring to see an investigative agency decide who’s right and wrong by issuing a statement (wrapped in a self-justifying plan of action) on behalf of one side of the issue.

“The Keystone pipeline, as part of the oil and natural gas industry, is vital to the security and economy of the United States.”

Having decided that protecting corporate interests was roughly aligned with its “national security” purview, agents then routed around any internal controls that might have restricted its plans to break FBI policy.

[T]he partially redacted documents reveal the investigation into anti-Keystone activists occurred without prior approval of the top lawyer and senior agent in the Houston field office, a stipulation laid down in rules provided by the attorney general.

But, hey, no problem because the FBI totally fixed things in-house and in post.

Confronted by evidence contained in the cache of documents, the agency admitted that “FBI approval levels required by internal policy were not initially obtained” for the investigation, but said the failure was remedied and later reported internally.

The supposed extremists it monitored the longest were part of an organization known as the Tar Sands Blockade, a group committed to nonviolent protest. While minor crimes such as trespassing were committed by members of the group, nothing rose to the level of what one would normally associate with an FBI investigation. And it went on for 11 months after the “error” that allowed the investigation to exist in the first place was discovered.

Mike German, former FBI agent and fellow at the Brennan Center for Justice lays out the obvious problem with the FBI’s behavior:

“It is clearly troubling that these documents suggest the FBI interprets its national security mandate as protecting private industry from political criticism,” he said.

That is troubling. Just as troubling is the agency’s determination that the surveillance it never should have initiated resulted in no “adverse effects.” But for who? Obviously, the FBI walked away from this with little more than another dent in its now-heavily damaged reputation. But what about those who were surveilled? Or those who might be in the future when they exercise their First Amendment rights? The FBI’s self-assessment doesn’t factor in these consequences and because it doesn’t, it will likely make the same (intentional) “mistakes” in the future.

Filed Under: , , , , , ,

Rate this comment as insightful
Rate this comment as funny
You have rated this comment as insightful
You have rated this comment as funny
Flag this comment as abusive/trolling/spam
You have flagged this comment
The first word has already been claimed
The last word has already been claimed
Insightful Lightbulb icon Funny Laughing icon Abusive/trolling/spam Flag icon Insightful badge Lightbulb icon Funny badge Laughing icon Comments icon

Comments on “FBI Spied On Activists Because Protecting Corporate Interests Is Roughly Equivalent To Ensuring National Security”

Subscribe: RSS Leave a comment
Ninja (profile) says:

It’s not only doing it for corporate interests but if something that’s deemed immoral or not in line with the sacred American family is also swept under the surveillance rug. A while back I was fortunate to have a chat with a girl that was very engaged in activism for sex workers and she even had Govt agents follow her around and later found out she was under close scrutiny for about 2.5 years. For fighting for the rights of sex workers. If you expand the search field a bit you’ll remember Swartz being harassed for his activism (I’m not sure if the FBI was involved). Examples are out there to be seen.

k. katsoner says:

Re: being a good american

I decided to be a good american and write a letter a day to a senator or a member of congress, just one letter a day to show the government. federal or local, I was a citizen involved. BIG booboo, my phone got taped, people asked me what’s wrong with your phone/landline. And after a few days,they got tired of hearing the recipes homemade for low calorie french dressing or tomato cake they left. I was taken aback by what they who ever they are, they can decide,and label dangerous but worse deem and mark anyone for investigation, thats scary.
Corp criminals who move in and out of Govt must go to Jail/prison, these are the hidden policy makers of the police state.

Jeremy2020 (profile) says:

Our current reality so much mirrors this show I watched called Continuum where in the future we are ruled by the “Corporate Congress”.

They did such a good job of showing how something simple like a wristband that tracks all of your health data to help you and your doctor treat you which was then used by the government/corporations to establish control.

It’s crazy that reality mirrors fiction so much. It seems like we’re actually headed for a totalitarian corporate state.

J4_wR says:

Re: Re: Re:

I have only seen the first few episodes. It may get better but so far…I don’t know. The heroine is a cop hunting down members of an underground that are rebelling against a post-democratic authoritarian corporate government. The rebels are simply psychos and she is represented as a “good guy”. Her being a tool for a dystopian corporatocracy isn’t even explored – it is simply accepted. The show seems to have no real problem with human rights being subverted by corporations. It feels very strange to me.

Personanongrata says:

FBI Defenders of The Status Quo

The FBI illegally surveilling American citizens exercising their inherent right to free speech and peaceful assembly further exposes the cretins within the FBI (and other state security organs) as the frauds they truly are.

These state security cretins care not about American citizens safety/liberty rather they are defenders of the status quo who are keen on stamping out the glowing-embers of change before they reach their masters tinder box of a lifestyle.

Peter (profile) says:

Simply unbelievable...

The First Amendment is supposed to means it’s protected from the FBI, and every other watchdog, but it simply is not. I think a police state is right on — and unless we’re going to actually do something to stop it, we are powerless to stop it. It’s very elementary — do you want to DO SOMETHING about it, or don’t you care?

Anonymous Coward says:

Re: Simply unbelievable...

“…and unless we’re going to actually do something to stop it, we are powerless to stop it.”

I agree. It has largely come to this point as a direct result of our society’s apathy and passivity.

If you or someone you know is in search of level-headed, non-violent, and effective ideas for what to do to help save our democracy, please consider reading up on it here: Reforming America: steps to new politics

…and as always, support the groups that are currently taking meaningful action by fighting in court against these sorts of thing on our behalf (e.g., EFF, ACLU, EPIC, Privacy International, etc.)

If you can hear this, you are the Resistance.

Ambrellite (profile) says:

These investigations (supposedly) only collect information that the FBI doesn’t intend to use in court, but what assurance do we have that the FBI isn’t providing that information to third parties, such as the corporations that they’re explicitly trying to protect?

We need to treat all such illegally-obtained data as violations when they happen, not just when they’re used against us in court. The data must be erased, and thosee responsible subjected to personal consequences (even a simple fine would do).

Anonymous Coward says:

Is Barack Obama an extremist?

>“Many of these extremists believe the debates over pollution, protection of wildlife, safety, and property rights have been overshadowed by the promise of jobs and cheaper oil prices,” the FBI document states.

Isn’t this quite similar to President Obama’s position?

iclei_is_icky says:

Re: Re: Re: Is Barack Obama an extremist?

re: yeah – blame him for everything … thanks obama

I blame myself.

After all.

* I authorized the aumf.

* I authored the patriot act.

* I got quackery converted to a DR / PHD along with false science DSM to be used as a political weapon to take away firearms, at the same time I used my DSM and tortured my new enemy combatants whom I have created via problem reaction solution.

* I also have among my accomplishments created electronic voting and got HAVA 2004 ACT rammed in, I almost have INTERNET VOTING rammed in.

* I also made sure the banks don’t have to follow the constitution, or rule of law.

* I try to grab firearms and I attack the constitution by simply exploiting my new registration database,

* I love the Psychiatrists with their DSM I also created, sending me more data – even though DR Patient is supposed to be sacred – we can share a little – the important stuff like getting your ass disarmed and labeled crazy so you can’t do shit about the Police State I ALSO CREATED.


* I love How I go to the wrong address and kill people all the time and nothing happens. Dogs and Cats and Kids a bonus point. THe nightmares and FEAR I spread is PRICELESS

* I love how my state secrets can ensure I get away with ANYTHING.

* I love how my Judges get jurors to be too scared to do nullification

* I LOVE the fraud my IPCC generated.

* I LOVE UN AGENDA 21 – it’s fun to watch the forced vaccines legally make the people twitch at the end, as they die. The twitching is priceless. The horror as the rest of the family loses their health, wealth and prosperity is PRICELESS. IT’s like raping a virgin–DIVINE!

Now if I could just shut up.
I want you to tell me to shut up when I bring all of this stuff up, because if WE talk about it it might actually get solved. IF people were to actually challenge the unconstitutional barricades I have been tossing in their path to their destruction, they might figure out I am undermining the United States from the INSIDE and they might start looking at dual citizens in the pentagon and other parts of my planning, they might see I Purged out all those OATH KEEPERS, We just can’t have Generals or troops who do the right thing in a murderous police state. I do not want you to discover my TREASON and COUP!

So tell me to STFU! like you mean it. Maybe just SHOOT me now?!

You see what I am saying?

iclei_is_icky says:

Re: Re: Re:2 Is Barack Obama an extremist?

You know I do have one regret.

At the Bundy ranch.

I should have gotten a fake warrant and forced everyone on the ranch to take a Psych Eval. Then Using my psychiatrists and their bible the DSM we together could take all the peoples guns away using a LEGAL WARRANT and the NCIC database through the HHS database and 36 agency share. So our MERC’s could kill everyone (cough do their ops) easier and steal (aquire) the land. Good grief, we still can’t give the land to the China — A massive error I made!

I been having sleepless nights over this now for months.

I don’t think mowing down 1000 Palestinians with an Aircraft GUN would cheer me up. I just feel so depressed.

iclei_is_icky says:

Re: Re: Re:3 Is Barack Obama an extremist?

Also remember when the cops go to the wrong house?

I found out I CAN make that happen on accident (wink) 100% of the time. Just by screwing with the database using a HEX EDITOR!~ hahaha I love technology

1134 Target Boulavard

00000000 31 31 33 34 20 54 61 72 67 65 74 20 42 6F 75 6C 1134 Target Boul
00000010 61 76 61 72 64 avard


2134 Target Boulavard

00000000 33 31 33 34 20 54 61 72 67 65 74 20 42 6F 75 6C 1134 Target Boul
00000010 61 76 61 72 64 avard

1134 = 31 31 33 34
2134 = 33 31 33 34
and boom your off to the wrong address with guns.

Free for All says:

Nothing to See Here

This is nothing new. A couple of recent cases come to mind.

There was the prosecutor that charged a man with a crime because he wrote anti-bank statements on a public sidewalk in washable chalk.

The prosecutor that drove Aaron Swartz to suicide made the choice to defend the profits of a company that puts taxpayer funded research information behind a paywall.

If you’re a corporation that wants to rip off or poison the public the US legal system has your back.

Coyne Tibbets (profile) says:

Government capture

This is a lovely example of government capture by a corporation.

A corporation that will bring 35 permanent jobs to the entire U.S.; will bay $negative taxes; will profit no company in the U.S.; risks environmental damage; destroys property rights; won’t provide the U.S. with a single drop of oil; and…well, there is not a single visible upside to Keystone XL that can possibly outweigh even one of the negatives.

Yet the government (every level) is bending over backwards for Keystone; not only to give them permission but to secure their land and protect their activities; including as described here, suppression of public comment and activism.

No matter what pithy platitudes may be mouthed by our legislators or courts: anyone who gets in the way will be pepper-sprayed, tazed, clubbed, beaten, stomped, arrested, jailed, sued, imprisoned, terrorized, or declared a terrorist; or will be forced by loss of employment, eminent domain, or other tricks to move. By the time it’s over we will possibly even see people burned out or murdered.

Keystone XL is happening; might as well accept it. Our lapdog government hastens to do its fawning duty.

Jopin Klobe (profile) says:

Creeping Corporate takeover

Look at just two things: 1. Electronic voting 2. “Citixens’ United” court case.

1. The program(s) running our voting system are considered “proprietary”, and, thus, can not be inspected by anyone other than the corporation that owns the rights. The voting population does not have the right to know.

2. “Dark Money” (the neo-Cons word for it) says it all.

The lines are now blurred enough for Corporatism to take over completely.

Uriel-238 (profile) says:

Isn't this the New American Century?

After ICE raided Kim Dotcom for the MPAA I thought that defined government agencies as now mercenary services for big industry (rather than, y’know, keepers of the peace and actual law enforcement). It was affirmed when SWAT guys raided someone’s house for a stolen iPhone prototype.

So of course the FBI works for big oil. If that was a problem, we would have been worried about it when symptoms of corporate occupation were evident long ago.

Larry Allen says:


They are protecting David and Charles Koch who are the extremists in this case, threatening the economy by blocking a $51 Trillion renewable energy market; Threatening national security by voting for more global warming which has already been declared a national security threat, and also harming our international prestige as we are increasingly viewed as a country unable to get its own house in order. If this supposed law enforcement agency persists in supporting big oil AGAINST the federal government they will have he’ll to pay eventually.

Anonymous Coward says:

Don’t forget about the Federal Law declaring people who report animal abuses, as terrorists. The Animal Enterprise Terrorism Act (AETA).


The next thing you’ll hear about is individuals who violate copyright and patent laws being labeled as terrorists. After all, it’s claimed that such individuals ‘degrade’ the economy and thus, jeopardize the national security of countries (the stock market).

So Grandma in the US ordering her drugs from India for a discount will be labeled as a anti drug patent extremist in due time. Give it a few more years and a couple more “free trade” (policy laundering) agreements.

Add Your Comment

Your email address will not be published.

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here

Comment Options:

Make this the or (get credits or sign in to see balance) what's this?

What's this?

Techdirt community members with Techdirt Credits can spotlight a comment as either the "First Word" or "Last Word" on a particular comment thread. Credits can be purchased at the Techdirt Insider Shop »

Follow Techdirt

Techdirt Daily Newsletter

Techdirt Deals
Techdirt Insider Discord
The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...