One ISP's Prices Are So Bad, It Refuses To Tell Anyone What They Are

from the pampered-duopolist dept

Given that the lack of competition keeps broadband prices sky high, it’s really no surprise that most ISPs make their pricing as confusing as possible, either hiding what you’ll pay behind a prequalification wall, or sacking users with a bevy of bizarre fees to covertly jack up the advertised rate post sale. While the industry is quick to issue a slew of press releases every time they bump their downstream speeds a few megabits, they’ll usually do their best to avoid mentioning what customers pay for the honor of these faster services, well aware that they’re only drawing additional attention to competitive shortcomings.

Still, even with layers upon layers of obfuscation, broadband ISPs will usually tell you what they charge users when pressed. Not so with FairPoint. When an industry outlet recently reached out to FairPoint as part of a series trying to compare prices, FairPoint actually refused to tell the news outlet how much it charges for DSL service. When pressed, the company would only provide what has to be one of the most long-winded non-answers I’ve ever seen:

“We offer internet access to both consumer and business customers through a variety of technologies leveraging both copper and fiber infrastructure, including digital subscriber line (‘DSL’), dedicated fiber and lit buildings throughout our footprint,” FairPoint said in an e-mailed statement. “Certain of these services provide speeds up to 1 gigabit per second. In select markets, we also offer cable modem internet service, ‘Fiber to the Home’, and wireless internet access. We sell Internet service as both a standalone, managed or packaged solution. Many customers like to simplify vendors and utilize our packaged and bundled solutions to meet their communications needs.”

That’s code for saying that FairPoint faces so little competition in its territories, it not only doesn’t have to disclose how much it charges for service, it doesn’t have to care whether you find that kind of stonewalling obnoxious. If you need FairPoint’s broadband service, there’s a pretty good chance that FairPoint service is your only option, so you’ll have to wait until you’ve actually signed up to truly learn how much you’ll get to pay.

Correction: In the initially published version, we accidentally called FairPoint, Frontier in some places. We apologize for the error.

Filed Under: , , ,
Companies: fairpoint

Rate this comment as insightful
Rate this comment as funny
You have rated this comment as insightful
You have rated this comment as funny
Flag this comment as abusive/trolling/spam
You have flagged this comment
The first word has already been claimed
The last word has already been claimed
Insightful Lightbulb icon Funny Laughing icon Abusive/trolling/spam Flag icon Insightful badge Lightbulb icon Funny badge Laughing icon Comments icon

Comments on “One ISP's Prices Are So Bad, It Refuses To Tell Anyone What They Are”

Subscribe: RSS Leave a comment
John Nolin (user link) says:

Not valuable at any price

My brother had the misfortune of FairPoint DSL just 5 towns East of where I have great fiber service through another vendor. During the strike that started last October, his service mysteriously began slowing down and by Thanksgiving it was so spotty as to be unusable.
By year end FairPoint arranged to get an out of area manager to come and make a service call. After the fellow spent the day making adjustments at the house and the service box up the street, the service failed completely.
After waiting another month for a second service call to come and fix the repair the first one had made, my brother gave up and got Xfinity as it was his only other choice. Within 4 days he had newer and faster service for $15 more per month than had been paying.
FairPoint has fiber in the region, just not in my brother’s town. Verizon has high speed in his town, just not to his neighborhood. Xfinity is more costly, but at least it works where he is.

Mark Gisleson (profile) says:

The only reason

Frontier is not more hated than Comcast is that Comcast has far more customers.

In Wisconsin where I live Frontier is worse than a joke. Basic phone service runs about $60 a month. You can go without features, but they will — one way or another — trick your landline bill into being $60 a month. DSL is imaginary and any google search for Frontier and DSL will find tons of angry missives from customers of this alleged service.

They do not upgrade phone lines and the entire company is an invisibly owned Ponzi scheme. Apparently control of the company keeps getting sold to new investors who loot and then move on.

Worst phone company ever.

Anonymous Coward says:

Re: Re: The only reason

Are there ADSL vendors that don’t do that?

AT&T has been forcing DSL customers to use POTS on each DSL line they provision. I use as my DSL vendor and since they provision an AT&T circuit, I still have to pay for a POTS line.

Furthermore, I have 2 DSL lines in this house (one for work, one for everything else), and I have to pay for two separate phone numbers as a result… it’s asinine, but I just assumed all DSL provides do this.

Karl Bode (profile) says:

Re: Re: Re: The only reason

Five years ago, there was a big push by consumers and regulators to force many of the telcos to offer “naked” DSL, so there was a notable uptick. AT&T had to adhere to it as a BellSouth merger condition. But over the last few years they’ve all shifted back to forcing people to bundle the landline, and regulators no longer seem to care.

They usuaully offer up all kinds of ridiculous justifications for why. One telco claimed that if they weren’t allowed to offer voice over copper those lines would “oxidize and fail.”

Anonymous Coward says:

Re: Re: Re:2 The only reason

That’s unfortunate…

About 15 years ago, I actually did have naked circuit provisioned for IDSL through some other DSL vendor (Speakeasy?)… I think it was a New Edge Networks circuit.

As soon as ADSL came to my neighborhood, I was quick to switch to and avoid paying the $120/mo for 144kbit 😉 – since I already had a landline for voice, I didn’t think it was a big deal at the time, but these days I wish it was unbundled. Especially with dual DSL lines.

jilocasin (profile) says:

Count me as one of the unfortunate ones.

unFairPoint user myself (unfortunately).

Good points: When it works, it’s stable.

Bad points: Where to begin….

If something _ever_ happens, it can make George Orwell seem terribly naive, Franz Kafka a model of directness.

Examples include:

Failed connection, FairPoint confirms the issue is a blown card in their central office. They refuse to repair the issue until you schedule a technician’s visit. Yes, it’s in _their_ facility, no they never did actually show up at my house.

Can not connect outside of FairPoint’s walled garden to the greater internet (they are still using PPOE on DSL). After more than 4 hours and three levels of support, FairPoint discovers that they have changed the PPOE password without notice. Entering the updated password re-enables internet access.

But wait there’s more (sounding like a 2:00AM infomercial). The next day a FairPoint tech arrives at the house unannounced. Insists on coming inside to “check on the issue”. When he is refused entry with the explanation that the issue has been resolved, he proceeds to climb up a near by telephone poll to disconnect internet service to the house. It takes several phone calls to FairPoint corporate and complaining to the PUC to get service restored several hours later.

Can not connect to the internet, or even their walled garden. No green lights on the DSL ‘modem’, one red, a few yellow. Call tech support. Passed around and put on hold for 16 hours. The last time I was put on hold was from a male ‘supervisor’ for more than 3 hours. Finally, in the wee hours of the morning a female supervisor picks up the phone and asks how she can help. I explain that I can’t connect, she asks; “What does the DSL modem look like?”

I answer; “Red, yellow, yell…”

She breaks in and says;
“Your modem is defective, we’ll ship one out overnight. You can throw away that one if you want.”

Finally, FairPoint doesn’t limit themselves to just technical incompetence. One month I notice my bill (phone & DSL) has gone up $5.00. When I called to ask just why my bill has gone up the FairPoint employee says;

“Oh, you noticed that.”
“We add that fee to everyone, but it’s O.K. because we’ll remove it if anyone complains.”

Which they promptly did.

Adam (profile) says:

Poor pricing?

Recently my ISP showed up the competitor in the area… The competitor offered 15MBit in (and like 1MBit out) service for about 60 bucks (pre-tax/fee price) a month. I was paying 90 (pre-tax/fee price and not including my cost for dedicated ip) for 75MBit in (and 10Mbit out). The competitor dropped their pricing and upped their speed. You can now get 25MBit in and 2MBit out for 45 bucks. My provider promptly responded with a notice about my service. Effective immediately my rate would be raised to 110MBit in and 15MBit out… at no additional charge. Now that’s how you compete. To compare apples to apples, comparable speeds are offered at 25/4MBit and costs just 30 bucks. I can’t imagine anyone’s shopping the competitor when they have any choice.

Bicoid says:

I pay $42 for 15 Mbps from Fairpoint. I dropped my phone line and have naked/dry-loop DSL. One of the biggest problems with their DSL connections is that it significantly suffers from bufferbloat. The routers they give out don’t correct for it, and many people in our town in NH (where Fairpoint has a monopoly) constantly complain about how their connections are never stable. The way to fix this, and have an EXCELLENT Fairpoint connection, is to get a router that can better manage packets. This can be done by either installing OpenWRT firmware running the Smart Queue Management protocol. If that’s a pain in the butt, you can find companies selling TP-Link routers running similar software – the IQrouter is a very good example of this. Both options worked well for me and others in our town, and have made many (but not all) Fairpoint headaches a thing of the past.

Kristin Haskins says:


I am furious!!!! T was getting by FINE with using fair point for my landline corded phone.That’s ALL I wanted from them.
I use Charter for my internet because it is BETTER.
Now, I’m being forced to change to enter Charter for my landline- costing MORE.
Consumers SHOULD be able to Get what they WANT and WHO they get it FROM!

Kristin Haskins
52Lewis St Barre By 05641 802-476-2059

Add Your Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here

Comment Options:

Make this the or (get credits or sign in to see balance) what's this?

What's this?

Techdirt community members with Techdirt Credits can spotlight a comment as either the "First Word" or "Last Word" on a particular comment thread. Credits can be purchased at the Techdirt Insider Shop »

Follow Techdirt

Techdirt Daily Newsletter

Techdirt Deals
Techdirt Insider Discord
The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...
Older Stuff
04:48 Dumb Telecom Take Of The Week: Because The Internet Didn't Explode, Killing Net Neutrality Must Not Have Mattered (23)
09:37 British Telecom Wants Netflix To Pay A Tax Simply Because Squid Game Is Popular (32)
04:55 Axios Parrots A Lot Of Dumb, Debunked Nonsense About Net Neutrality (54)
10:50 NY AG Proves Broadband Industry Funded Phony Public Support For Attack On Net Neutrality (10)
06:24 The GOP Is Using Veterans As Props To Demonize Net Neutrality (22)
06:03 Telecom Using Veterans As Props To Demonize California's New Net Neutrality Law (12)
09:32 AT&T Whines That California Net Neutrality Rules Are Forcing It To Behave (11)
06:23 The New York Times (Falsely) Informs Its 7 Million Readers Net Neutrality Is 'Pointless' (51)
15:34 Facebook's Australian News Ban Did Demonstrate The Evil Of Zero Rating (18)
04:58 'Net Neutrality Hurt Internet Infrastructure Investment' Is The Bad Faith Lie That Simply Won't Die (11)
05:48 Dumb New GOP Talking Point: If You Restore Net Neutrality, You HAVE To Kill Section 230. Just Because! (66)
06:31 DOJ Drops Ridiculous Trump-Era Lawsuit Against California For Passing Net Neutrality Rules (13)
06:27 The Wall Street Journal Kisses Big Telecom's Ass In Whiny Screed About 'Big Tech' (13)
10:45 New Interim FCC Boss Jessica Rosenworcel Will Likely Restore Net Neutrality, Just Not Yet (5)
15:30 Small Idaho ISP 'Punishes' Twitter And Facebook's 'Censorship' ... By Blocking Access To Them Entirely (81)
05:29 A Few Reminders Before The Tired Net Neutrality Debate Is Rekindled (13)
06:22 U.S. Broadband Speeds Jumped 90% in 2020. But No, It Had Nothing To Do With Killing Net Neutrality. (12)
12:10 FCC Ignores The Courts, Finalizes Facts-Optional Repeal Of Net Neutrality (19)
10:46 It's Opposite Day At The FCC: Rejects All Its Own Legal Arguments Against Net Neutrality To Claim It Can Be The Internet Speech Police (13)
12:05 Blatant Hypocrite Ajit Pai Decides To Move Forward With Bogus, Unconstitutional Rulemaking On Section 230 (178)
06:49 FCC's Pai Puts Final Bullet In Net Neutrality Ahead Of Potential Demotion (25)
06:31 The EU Makes It Clear That 'Zero Rating' Violates Net Neutrality (6)
06:22 DOJ Continues Its Quest To Kill Net Neutrality (And Consumer Protection In General) In California (11)
11:08 Hypocritical AT&T Makes A Mockery Of Itself; Says 230 Should Be Reformed For Real Net Neutrality (28)
06:20 Trump, Big Telecom Continue Quest To Ban States From Protecting Broadband Consumers (19)
06:11 Senators Wyden And Markey Make It Clear AT&T Is Violating Net Neutrality (13)
06:31 Net Neutrali-what? AT&T's New Streaming Service Won't Count Against Its Broadband Caps. But Netflix Will. (25)
06:23 Telecom's Latest Dumb Claim: The Internet Only Works During A Pandemic Because We Killed Net Neutrality (49)
13:36 Ex-FCC Staffer Says FCC Authority Given Up In Net Neutrality Repeal Sure Would Prove Handy In A Crisis (13)
06:27 Clarence Thomas Regrets Brand X Decision That Paved Way For The Net Neutrality Wars (11)
More arrow