DailyDirt: Winning A Nobel Prize And Thinking Differently

from the urls-we-dig-up dept

A fairly sizable list of Nobel laureates suffer from Nobel disease — a phenomenon in which respected scientists publicly espouse somewhat crazy ideas. Perhaps just being famous also causes this affliction…? Or maybe there should be more research on this topic, worthy of an Ig Nobel award. In any case, here are a few links on some Nobel prize winners that demonstrate these people are still human.

If you’d like to read more awesome and interesting stuff, check out this unrelated (but not entirely random!) Techdirt post via StumbleUpon.

Filed Under: , , , , , ,

Rate this comment as insightful
Rate this comment as funny
You have rated this comment as insightful
You have rated this comment as funny
Flag this comment as abusive/trolling/spam
You have flagged this comment
The first word has already been claimed
The last word has already been claimed
Insightful Lightbulb icon Funny Laughing icon Abusive/trolling/spam Flag icon Insightful badge Lightbulb icon Funny badge Laughing icon Comments icon

Comments on “DailyDirt: Winning A Nobel Prize And Thinking Differently”

Subscribe: RSS Leave a comment
Anonymous Coward says:

Re: Wording

The scientific community is addled with ridicule and hubris.

Go and look at the annals of history where more than plenty of great inventors were scoffed at and resisted by the scientific community… prompting this old saying.

Science progresses one funeral at a time.

Or better yet…

“A new scientific truth does not triumph by convincing its opponents and making them see the light, but rather because its opponents eventually die, and a new generation grows up that is familiar with it.”

~Max Planck

That One Guy (profile) says:

Re: What you seem to be saying

If the consensus is backed by the available evidence, and the opposing idea(s) aren’t, then yeah, I’d say go with the consensus. If both sides have solid, verifiable evidence backing their positions, then that means it’s time to do more research, and see about reconciling the difference.

Another Anonymous Coward says:

Linus Pauling

Pauling is an example of anyone who decides to weigh in on an area outside of his/her field of expertise, and depends on their celebrity status to carry the day. That kind of hubris isn’t just restricted to scientists. Every day you hear about actors, politicians, and so on (even on this site) pontificating on subjects they have no knowledge of.

Intellectual integrity is truly a rare thing.

Bo says:


Linus Pauling is hardly a quack, and as far as hubris, he took no end of flack and loss of reputation for fighting against above ground nuclear testing, which they’ve calculated killed 10k or more Americans. He was branded a communist for wanting to save American lives.
Now if you look at the average life span of doctors, they live a few years less than the average person. Meanwhile all of the doctors I’ve been able to find that took 1 gram or more vit c till the end, lived on average about 9 years longer than the average person. Guess who’s advice I’m going to take.

Leave a Reply to Wayne Manors Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here

Comment Options:

Make this the or (get credits or sign in to see balance) what's this?

What's this?

Techdirt community members with Techdirt Credits can spotlight a comment as either the "First Word" or "Last Word" on a particular comment thread. Credits can be purchased at the Techdirt Insider Shop »

Follow Techdirt

Techdirt Daily Newsletter

Techdirt Deals
Techdirt Insider Discord
The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...