Attention Kim Kardashian: You Can't Sue Another Woman For Having A Big Ass And An Instagram Account
from the butt-why? dept
Let’s pretend for a moment that for-some-reason-a-celebrity Kim Kardashian reads Techdirt. Someone needs to let her know that lawsuits and lawyers are not for temper tantrums over threats to your own celebrity. I’d have thought she’d have previously learned this lesson after Old Navy staved off the lawsuit she filed because the clothing company had the gall to hire a brunette woman for one of their commercials. It would appear not, now that she’s reportedly investigating whether or not she can sue a woman named Jen Selter for “copying” Kim’s poses (bwah?) and having a big ass.
Selter has been posting photographs of her large buttocks on Instagram, an activity Kardashian apparently feels is an unacceptable infringement upon her very raison d’etre: one of the gangplanks of Kim Kardashian’s global celebrity being her nonpareil ability to take photographs of her own large buttocks with a cameraphone. “Kim thinks Jen copies all her poses … she is fuming as she feels her curvy bum is one of her most unique selling points and feels that Jen is just trying to cash in.”
After, ahem, extensive research, I can assure you that there is very little in these poses that is either unique or identifiable as being Kardashian-esque, beyond the camera’s fixation on the subject’s posterior. This isn’t a “Blue Steel” Zoolander thing, it’s a series of pictures that feature an attractive woman with a particular physical asset. What appears to be upsetting Kardashian, according to the post, is that Selter has been winning modeling and endorsement gigs.
“Insiders say Kim has sought legal advice to see if they can stop Jen,” it read, raising the very real possibility that, somewhere in California, a crack team of lawyers may at this very moment be working around the clock to copyright buttocks on behalf of Kim Kardashian.
It likely wouldn’t be copyright that would come into play, but possibly some combination of publicity rights and/or trademark (trying to think like a really bad lawyer would is not that easy). But so what? It isn’t a violation of trademark or publicity rights to simply naturally look in some way similar to another person, and there is absolutely no attempt in these pictures at a depiction of anything to do with any Kardashian anywhere. This reeks of the Old Navy case all over again, except the “look alike” looks even less “alike,” and you can expect any legal action from Kardashian to be similarly fruitless.
Filed Under: copying, copyright, jen selter, kim kardashian, lawsuits, poses, publicity rights, trademark
Comments on “Attention Kim Kardashian: You Can't Sue Another Woman For Having A Big Ass And An Instagram Account”
So, asses copyrighting asses. Next!
Re: Re:
With a (butt)crack team of lawyers, no less.
Re: Re: Re:
Kim would never hire a half-assed lawyer. She knows a full-assed lawyer when she sees one.
So now SWAT teams are going to bust ass?
If having a curvy butt is now a “copyright infringement”, are we going to have SWAT teams not only arresting offending panties, but the behinds in them?
Re: So now SWAT teams are going to bust ass?
Putting new meaning behind ASSet forfeiture.
Re: Re: So now SWAT teams are going to bust ass?
Also, SWAT
When dumb is all you have, you’ll want to defend it with your life.
She is just pissed that chic is marginally more attractive lol..
And since when is an entirely over-sized ass a unique selling proposition. I think I missed that memo.
Re: Re:
I guess it all depends on your…ahem…point of view, top down or bottom up!
Re: Re:
I never got that either. Big butts are the turnoff…
“After, ahem, extensive research, I can assure you that there is very little in these poses that is either unique or identifiable as being Kardashian-esque, beyond the camera’s fixation on the subject’s posterior.”
I’m afraid Tim; I’m not going to be able to take you at your word. I feel, in the interest of due diligence, that I will have to verify your findings with additional independent research. I’m sure you understand….
Waking Up With Kimye - SNL Highlight - YouTube
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-0bT60BLYKM
I have a big ass and an instagram account. Come at me, Kim. Or are you only threatened by non-hairy asses?
Re: Re:
No that’s an image I didn’t need at this time of the morning, and especially not just before breakfast.
Re: Re: Re:
Better just BEFORE breakfast than just AFTER breakfast. 😉
Can we just sterilize anyone within ‘3 hops’ of family members or those in relation to a Kardashian already?
She will wipe the floor with her!
Wow, now we cannot post a picture of our derrieres without worrying that some celebrity with a big ass bank account will come by and use the full weight of their significant assets to wipe us off the face of the interwebz. It is truly a great time to be alive. This stinks….
Kim doesn’t have much longer to have the looks she has. She has already over done her publicity. If I didn’t hear that name again, I’d be ok with it.
It’s not like she is mainly known as a clothes horse. Oh, wait.
To be fair
If she was the first person to take a selfie of her butt, surely that cultural contribution is worthy of reward. The real question is how long should the monopoly she gets last for ?
Kim K.: Proving not only does she have one, she is one.
Just so you know...
I will need to get my hands in on this one….
Mr Bumble says
…the law is a ass…
Maybe her ass is that large
because her head is firmly stuck there?
One has a big ass, the other is a big ass.
Seriously. Just how in the hell did these twits ever become celebrities in the first place?!
Re: Re:
“Just how in the hell did these twits ever become celebrities in the first place?!”
It’s nothing more or less than the power of promotion and marketing.
Re: Re:
Or to put that another way…. family money.
Sing along
[Humming Sir Mix-a-Lot tune]
“It’s my
big
butt
and I cannot lie
That
interloper
must comply.”
Re: Sing along
The RIAA is waiting for their check.
Goes to Show...
Goes to show that no matter how inane the case, as long as there are billable hours, there will be lawyers involved.
I normally do not like to attack the reporting on this site, but I really don’t understand how this article made it to publishing without the necessary pictures to illustrate the issue.
Tim, I am disappointed.
Re: Re:
…without the necessary pictures to illustrate the issue…
You ain’t missing a damn thing!
Kim's Butt
I feel like I am really behind on this story.
She’s making a KardASShian of herself.
So she is posing with a Kanye lookalike?
“Let’s pretend for a moment that for-some-reason-a-celebrity Kim Kardashian reads”
You greatly overestimate her.
Is she going to try to trademark “whore”, now, too?
You cannot copyright or patent things in nature...
Opinion stated below, protected by the 1st Ammendment, so fuck off Kim.
ie – buttocks are buttocks, poses are poses and I am certain that Kim, dumb-ass, Kardashian is not the first to pose that way.
So she should get off her fat ass and shut the fuck up.
Not only does she have a big one, she is a big one.
At least, she's honest
It’s not about the singing, dancing, comedy, intelligence, smart wits, care for the environment or her sympathy with people in oppressed cultures.
At least, she’s honest about it. She deserves a respect-point from me. for that. Tip hat.
Or is it a lie and is it really about money, the bitch!
After, ahem, extensive research
While I do believe you Tim, I feel obliged to do this research myself this time for reasons that shouldn’t need to be expressed.
From DVD to Obama to Ass
First she posts a picture promoting Obama for the next election… 2 yrs from now, keeping in mind he CAN’T run again.
Now she’s trying to file suit claiming someone poses like her…
I guess someone finally told her she’s the laughing stock of the interwebs and now she’s trying to keep that crown.
Yet another way to get attention
I don’t think this story is real. Don’t get me wrong- I think the story exists and it’s worth talking about, but I get the feeling that this “case” is more about Kim getting more attention for herself than going through with a lawsuit. If someone could copyright poses, most men’s magazines would have been sued a long time ago for putting their centerfolds in the same poses.
And if you’re Kim, it’s insanely easy to find a lawyer who will take your case, no matter the legal merits. There are way too many lawyers who would love to be associated with Kim’s status and money.
So, again, I think she’s simply jealous that someone is copying her and she’s not getting 100% of people’s attention. After all, if she doesn’t have people’s attention, what else is she going to do with her life?