Revealed: What Kind Of 'Extra Scrutiny' The Government Gives To Folks On The Terrorist Watchlist
from the we're-about-to-go-through-your-lives dept
We’ve already written about The Intercept’s publication of the US government’s guidelines for declaring you a possible terrorist subject to extra scrutiny whenever you run into a government official. But we wanted to do a second post on the part that focuses on just what kind of extra scrutiny you get if you’re on the list. Basically, it’s dig through every aspect of this person’s life that you can:
In addition to data like fingerprints, travel itineraries, identification documents and gun licenses, the rules encourage screeners to acquire health insurance information, drug prescriptions, ?any cards with an electronic strip on it (hotel cards, grocery cards, gift cards, frequent flyer cards),? cellphones, email addresses, binoculars, peroxide, bank account numbers, pay stubs, academic transcripts, parking and speeding tickets, and want ads. The digital information singled out for collection includes social media accounts, cell phone lists, speed dial numbers, laptop images, thumb drives, iPods, Kindles, and cameras. All of the information is then uploaded to the TIDE database.
Screeners are also instructed to collect data on any ?pocket litter,? scuba gear, EZ Passes, library cards, and the titles of any books, along with information about their condition??e.g., new, dog-eared, annotated, unopened.? Business cards and conference materials are also targeted, as well as ?anything with an account number? and information about any gold or jewelry worn by the watchlisted individual. Even ?animal information??details about pets from veterinarians or tracking chips?is requested. The rulebook also encourages the collection of biometric or biographical data about the travel partners of watchlisted individuals.
In the wake of last month’s Wurie decision at the Supreme Court, I’m curious how much of that is now violating the subject’s 4th Amendment rights… It seems likely that at least someone is going to challenge these rules.