DailyDirt: Correlations With Living Longer

from the urls-we-dig-up dept

Lots of people say they’d like to live longer. So longevity has been studied extensively, and a vast number of correlations have been found. The list literally goes on and on and on. This doesn’t mean anyone has discovered the cure for death, and these correlations often have no causation logic behind them whatsoever. Drink a glass of wine every day, eat no meat, restrict your calories drastically, and read some of these other correlations.

If you’d like to read more awesome and interesting stuff, check out this unrelated (but not entirely random!) Techdirt post via StumbleUpon.

Filed Under: , , , , , ,

Rate this comment as insightful
Rate this comment as funny
You have rated this comment as insightful
You have rated this comment as funny
Flag this comment as abusive/trolling/spam
You have flagged this comment
The first word has already been claimed
The last word has already been claimed
Insightful Lightbulb icon Funny Laughing icon Abusive/trolling/spam Flag icon Insightful badge Lightbulb icon Funny badge Laughing icon Comments icon

Comments on “DailyDirt: Correlations With Living Longer”

Subscribe: RSS Leave a comment
Mason Wheeler (profile) says:

The wine thing’s been debunked. The line of reasoning originally went something like this:

People in France tend to live longer.
France is famous for its wine.
Therefore, drinking wine helps you live longer.

Then, armed with this certainty, people started searching for reasons to explain it, and eventually found a chemical in the skin of red grapes that serves as a natural antioxidant. Therefore, drinking red wine must be good for you.

Then recently a few actual scientists went back and looked at the original premise, and they found something interesting: people in France don’t actually drink very much wine at all; they export most of it. (Parallels to the Big Tobacco lawsuits of the 1990s immediately come to mind. Remember when it was revealed that not a single tobacco company CEO smoked?)

It turns out that wine (or alcoholic beverages of any variety) have zero beneficial impact on your health, and plenty of negative impacts… which anyone with a shred of common sense could have told you before a bunch of nonsense masquerading as science got involved.

John says:

Re: Re:

Mr. Wheeler: uh, what?

For starters, France has one of the HIGHEST, if not THE highest, per capita rates of wine consumption in the world.

Speaking as a healthcare practitioner, it is also false that alcohol consumption has no beneficial impact. Moderate consumption of alcohol has been correlated with lower risk of stroke, development and death from heart disease, and possibly prevent diabetes.

You should think before you speak. You should do your homework as well.

Mason Wheeler (profile) says:

Re: Re: Re:

I have done my homework. For example: the American Journal of Public Health reports that even moderate consumption of alcohol will take 17-19 years off your life and leads to much higher incidences of various mouth and throat cancers, as well as breast cancer. And the benefits you cite come from other things found in wine, because they’re found in ordinary grape juice.

John Fenderson (profile) says:

Re: Re: Re: Re:

“American Journal of Public Health reports that even moderate consumption of alcohol will take 17-19 years off your life”

This is a mischaracterization of what the study says. The reduction in life expectancy you cite only applies to those who have developed an alcohol-related cancer, not to all people who consume alcohol. I didn’t see if the study claimed percentage cancer increased by as a result of alcohol consumption, but it does claim that about 3.5% of all cancer deaths were from alcohol-related cancers.

So all in all, the study is saying that a rather tiny percentage of people who drink will see the 17-19 year life expectancy reduction.

Anonymous Coward says:

Join Scientology , because, many people have certainty that they have lived lives prior to their current one. These are referred to as past lives, not as reincarnation. Past lives is not a dogma in Scientology, but generally Scientologists, during their auditing, experience a past life and then know for themselves that they have lived before. To believe one had a physical or other existence prior to the identity of the current body is not a new concept Live long and prosper ,again , and again, and again , oh and again ..see ya next lifetime tata for now .

Anonymous Anonymous Coward says:

Re: Re:

The fallacy that I see in the past lives concept is the growing population. Are there a bunch of extra lives out there waiting to be reborn or is it a lottery? Some lives get relived and the others wait there turn?

Oh, any data on how many lives are in the reborning category vs the wait for the lottery category? Is there an endpoint to extra lives?

Inquiring minds want to know.

Anonymous Coward says:

Re: Re: Re:

I’m sorry but you you’ll need to pop in more quarters for that answer, or if you go to the change machine you can get limited offer Scientology coins , but we’ll be needing those back we do have a billion year contract that needs to signed , but the details are boring so just Sign here ___________, Here__________ and Here ___________ , we’ll work out the details at a later date after all you’ll be living for quite sometime.

Anonymous Anonymous Coward says:

Cultural Mind Control

“Several studies show that short people live longer than tall people, and there are some reasons for this correlation”

Now wait a minute. Throughout my childhood my parents, my schools, and everything presented on 50’s and 60’s TV told me to grow up tall and strong.

Talk about creating delusions. I could have not eaten those tortured brussel sprouts, or that broccoli cooked till gray, or the spinach that lacked even the basics of salt pepper and garlic, and flourished?

JoeCool (profile) says:

Height and longevity

FTFA: “Even if a couple of extra inches of height will increase your standing in the community, your IQ, and even your lifetime income, does that justify trading in years of your life?”

When those extra years are spent in constant pain and misery, wearing diapers and taking twenty pills a day while living in a nursing home, I’d have to say yes, it DOES justify trading those years for living better during the period you can best appreciate the benefits.

Add Your Comment

Your email address will not be published.

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here

Comment Options:

Make this the or (get credits or sign in to see balance) what's this?

What's this?

Techdirt community members with Techdirt Credits can spotlight a comment as either the "First Word" or "Last Word" on a particular comment thread. Credits can be purchased at the Techdirt Insider Shop »