As Big Pharma Piles On The Political Pressure, Indian Government Slows Pace Of Compulsory Drug Licensing

from the regrettable-for-many,-fatal-for-some dept

As we’ve been reporting for a while now, the Indian government has been taking advantage of the provision in TRIPS that permits it to issue compulsory licenses for key drugs at affordable prices. As Professor Brook Baker explained last year:

the WTO TRIPS Agreement allows India and any other country to issue compulsory licenses on any grounds they want to as long as certain procedural safeguards are followed. Using fully lawful compulsory licensing procedures, India did issue a compulsory license on an overpriced Bayer cancer medicine, citing three justifications in a 60-plus page decision: excessive pricing, failure to supply the market, and refusal to produce locally. As a result of this license, the cost of the cancer medicine has now fallen more than 97%, showing the excess mark-up that Bayer imposes on patients.

That obviously doesn’t sit too well with Western pharmaceutical companies, whose business model is essentially to sell low volumes of new drugs for extremely high prices that only the relatively affluent can afford. From the Western drug industry’s perspective, India’s actions are particularly troubling for the example they provide to other emerging nations. That’s why big pharma companies are getting US politicians to put pressure on India to limit grants of compulsory licenses, or face retaliatory measures. According to this article in The Times of India, it seems to be working:

Amid heightened scrutiny of the intellectual property regime, the [Indian] government has decided to tread with caution on a compulsory licence for a cancer drug to ensure that its decision is in line with the legal provisions.

While compulsory licencing, which entails waiver of patent under extreme situations, for three cancer drugs was being pushed by the health ministry, the issue is now limited to Dasatinib, a medicine to treat a type of cancer of the white blood cells, for which Bristol-Myers Squibb (BMS) holds a patent.

Although that caution is understandable, the sad fact is people are likely to die as a result of this slowing of the flow of cancer treatments at affordable prices, brought about by big pharma companies worried about profit margins. That’s rather ironic for an industry that is predicated on saving lives.

Follow me @glynmoody on Twitter or, and +glynmoody on Google+

Filed Under: , , , , ,

Rate this comment as insightful
Rate this comment as funny
You have rated this comment as insightful
You have rated this comment as funny
Flag this comment as abusive/trolling/spam
You have flagged this comment
The first word has already been claimed
The last word has already been claimed
Insightful Lightbulb icon Funny Laughing icon Abusive/trolling/spam Flag icon Insightful badge Lightbulb icon Funny badge Laughing icon Comments icon

Comments on “As Big Pharma Piles On The Political Pressure, Indian Government Slows Pace Of Compulsory Drug Licensing”

Subscribe: RSS Leave a comment
Anonymous Coward says:

It’s not ironic at all. It’s terrorism by health theft. “Nice populace you have there, be a shame if something happeneed to it…”

And it’s fucking disgusting. Remember that Bayer makes amost of its profits from drugs sold to Western countries and then demands that other countries pay that price – which is directly putting lives at risk.

That One Guy (profile) says:

It takes a special kind of sociopath...

… to prioritize profits over lives, and not give a damn if people die because they cannot afford the medicine they need.

The pharma industry of course is filled to the brim with these kinds of ‘people’, but it’s a serious shame that the Indian government, who had been willing to actually fight the greed of the scum to make sure their people were able to afford medicine, instead appear to be caving in to pressures from outside their country.

Anonymous Coward says:

Re: It takes a special kind of sociopath...

That’s just why a bunch of people were saying during the Obamacare debate that Obamacare doesn’t go far enough, because it doesn’t take the profits out of healthcare.

If your choice is pay some outrageous price for medical care you need that’s 1,000 times the actual expense, or die, you don’t have much of a choice but to pay up, if you even have money, or to die if you don’t have the money.

Rekrul says:

Re: It takes a special kind of sociopath...

It takes a special kind of sociopath…
… to prioritize profits over lives, and not give a damn if people die because they cannot afford the medicine they need.

The pharma industry of course is filled to the brim with these kinds of ‘people’, but it’s a serious shame that the Indian government, who had been willing to actually fight the greed of the scum to make sure their people were able to afford medicine, instead appear to be caving in to pressures from outside their country.

It’s a serious shame that the US government is the one putting the pressure on them. Really shows where their priorities lie.

Anonymous Coward says:


the pursuit of profit is the underlying principle behind all these companies, I expect the Management would get booted if they did not return maximum profit to the shareholders. And the politicians of the west are indebted to these companies because they bankroll their election campaigns. And Campaign finance reform is as dead as the dodo. And if any of the current crop of politicians becomes a political liability, there are another half dozen anal-orifices waiting to take their place.

Aussie Geoff (profile) says:

Re: Re:

Strange, they are being chastised for adhering to the treaty everyone agreed to.

Nothing strange about it at all. The largest PAC of US business (that would be what is laughingly call the US government) is all for enforcing treaties/agreements etc when they are told to by big business, but totally ignore them for exactly the same reason!

Why should they even consider any new treaties?

They shouldn’t. It is well past time that all countries negotiated acceptable agreements between themselves and not invite the US to participate of have any input. All it requires is for politicians around the world to grow a spine and tell the US they are not required or wanted. Of course the problem is finding the politicians that will do this.

GEMont (profile) says:

Re: Re: Grow a spine

Except that politicians are people and people have appetites, and generally, the greater the income, the more esoteric and deviant the appetites.

The NSA, uses the tried and true MAFIA proven rule that every man has his price, and by surveilling every communication of every politician and official in every country, they have managed to create a very, very, precise price list.

You will indeed see the exact opposite of what you want “politicians around the world” to do in the very near future. They will cave in to US demands one after the other, as they receive the notification of the price tag next to their names on that list.

What is really scary for people in power in foreign lands, is that the NSA/FBI/GCHQ/CIA can now upload the “incriminating evidence” directly onto their individual computers at will, using the back-doors built into the software already installed, in such a way as to make it appear that the owner was responsible.

There is no way to fight back against such a system of coercion.

Blackmail is an awesome business model, when you’re eavesdropping on the whole world.

GEMont (profile) says:

Re: They??

ummmm…. who they??

If you mean government, methinks you did not read the article fully. There is no “they” currently available on earth to punish or prevent excess by corporations. The old “law enforcement organizations” that were once responsible for this sort of action, are currently busy insuring that the peasants cannot upset the mega wealthy in any way, and arresting school children who point their finger at someone in a threatening manner.

Once again, money has spoken, and “they” are on the payroll.

GEMont (profile) says:

The Wonders of Blackmail

This is simply another example of the desired results of NSA surveillance-fueld blackmail.

When some nation/group decides to make a stand against the Empire’s desire to make the rules, all that the Corporocracy needs do is send each of the people composing the resisting force a message containing a list of their personal habits, foibles, sexploits and secret dealings. In no time at all, the opposition to the Empire’s desires fade away as if it had never been, especially if a couple of the hard-liners in the group are suddenly killed in auto-accidents, or plane crashes.

After all, none of the black-mailed victims is likely to tell anyone that they are being black-mailed.

The MAFIA and Drug Cartels proved the process works almost every time and the FED has simply made the process into policy.

GEMont (profile) says:

Re: patents are immoral and wrong

hmmm…. wasn’t that the same argument they made against usury – commonly known as interest….

Methinks that argument is not going to get very far against an organization that considers profit first and morality last – if at all.

Big Pharma has but one agenda – to sell as many drugs as possible, to as many people as possible, forever.

Corporate mandates do not include a morality clause.

The only purpose of corporation is profit on an ever-escalating scale, by any means possible. This, regardless of their product or service, is the mandate of all corporations.

To a corporation, wrong means income capital lost, and immoral refers to laws that prevent the corporation from lying, cheating and using other business models such as blackmail, that could wrest more income, from more people, faster.

Your argument is as pointless as saying organized crime is wrong and immoral. It was designed to be that way.

Lawrence D?Oliveiro says:

Meanwhile, In Venezuela...

We previously covered the repressive side of what the Government is up to in Venezuela. But on the flip side, with all the talk of shortage of supplies, including medicines, it appears the pharmacies have no shortage of generic versions of drugs. However, the doctors don?t like those, because they reckon they aren?t as effective as the (much more expensive) name-brand drugs.

But how can that be? Generics have exactly the same active ingredients, they are simply not manufactured under licence from the patent holders.

The Wanderer (profile) says:

Re: Meanwhile, In Venezuela...

Allegedly, even with the exact same ingredients, differences in the way you put them together can make a difference in the resulting effect – something like how you can start with “flour, water, and yeast” and end up with a loaf of bread, a pie crust, a pizza crust, or a batch of crackers, depending on what you do with them.

Also, allegedly even when the formulation is the same, the way it’s packaged can make a difference in delivery results – think “delayed release” medications for “day-long relief with just one dose!”, vs. something that gives you the same total dose all at once up front, so you get a stronger effect right away but a much weaker one near the end of the cycle.

Things like that probably don’t make a difference in many cases, but I can certainly see how they could do so in some cases.

Add Your Comment

Your email address will not be published.

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here

Comment Options:

Make this the or (get credits or sign in to see balance) what's this?

What's this?

Techdirt community members with Techdirt Credits can spotlight a comment as either the "First Word" or "Last Word" on a particular comment thread. Credits can be purchased at the Techdirt Insider Shop »

Follow Techdirt

Techdirt Daily Newsletter

Techdirt Deals
Techdirt Insider Discord
The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...