DirecTV Combats Weather Channel Price Hikes By…Actually Showing People The Weather

from the you're-really-not-very-good-at-your-only-job dept

The Weather Channel has been well-deserving of mockery over the last few years, whether its for their efforts to sex up storms by naming them (in the process creating a nation of weather neurotics who become hysterical about drizzle), or for an ocean of TV and website content that has absolutely nothing to do with the weather (here’s some funny faces, yuk yuk). As such, their recent battle with DirecTV over retransmission fees doesn’t find the company getting much sympathy. Especially when the channel tries to argue that people will die without their inane assortment of non-weather-related content.

Normally in such retransmission disputes the content company has some leverage over the satellite or cable TV provider because what they’re withholding has somewhat irreplaceable value to the viewer (say, like “Breaking Bad”). In The Weather Channel’s case, their belief that they somehow held an exclusive over weather forecasting, combined with the fact that they have increasingly gotten worse at their one and only job, has given DirecTV the upper hand in the ongoing feud. After pulling the channel from the lineup back in January, DirecTV continues to battle The Weather Channel in a very simple way — by simply offering viewers the weather for a change:

DirecTV on Monday unveiled a suite of new weather services for its subscribers, including a feature that allows customers to gain access to local weather information at any time…The satcaster said customers tuned to WeatherNation can press the red button on their remote to access instant local weather conditions and outlook. Later this week, short term and extended weather forecasts by zip code will also be integrated into the live WeatherNation broadcast and run automatically on the channel every 10 minutes.

Surely being offered actual information on the weather will outrage viewers who love sitting through a half hour of off-topic infotainment and dreck just to get the snow forecast totals for their neighborhood. Seriously, without The Weather Channel, who’ll tell us which celebrities like to hunt or provide recipes for cheesy chicken bites? Usually these retransmission feuds resolve with cable and satellite companies buckling and agreeing to some sort of significant hike (then passed on to you), though with the sort of stuff The Weather Channel has been producing in recent years, it’s not clear if customers will want DirecTV to cave.

Filed Under: , ,
Companies: directv, the weather channel

Rate this comment as insightful
Rate this comment as funny
You have rated this comment as insightful
You have rated this comment as funny
Flag this comment as abusive/trolling/spam
You have flagged this comment
The first word has already been claimed
The last word has already been claimed
Insightful Lightbulb icon Funny Laughing icon Abusive/trolling/spam Flag icon Insightful badge Lightbulb icon Funny badge Laughing icon Comments icon

Comments on “DirecTV Combats Weather Channel Price Hikes By…Actually Showing People The Weather”

Subscribe: RSS Leave a comment
58 Comments
That One Guy (profile) says:

When shooting your own foot isn't enough...

So now that DirecTV has started offering weather services themselves, and from the sound of it better weather services, what exactly does the Weather Channel have to bargain with? Cheap reality tv? Cooking shows?

In their attempt to get a bigger slice of the profits pie, they seem to have pretty thoroughly screwed themselves over here.

Player911 (user link) says:

Re: When shooting your own foot isn't enough...

I cut my cord years ago and got a Roku. One cool thing is it’s ability to have a custom weather screen saver that rotates through lots of selected information such as humidity,rainfall, snowfall, tides, sunrise, moon, current forcast, weekly forcast, etc. You can turn off and on which pages cycle and it cycles like every 5 seconds, so it’s pretty fast.

Honestly thats all we need. Plus who doesn’t have a weather app on their phones.

sorrykb (profile) says:

Re: Re: Re:

In cases of major disaster would be the only time I could see. Power is out and lines are cut leaving internet/phone, down, then most of those world wide options are gone. With a generator, you could get a radio or maybe a TV with satellite working.

This is why you keep a battery-operated AM radio and spare batteries in your home/car/workplace emergency kits. Much more reliable than a cable or satellite service. (Plus, it’s hard to fit the 51″ TV in the emergency kit.)

DannyB (profile) says:

Re: A simple analogy

Generalize that. Whatever a cable channel names themselves is the one thing that they will be bad at, and will be drowned out by other off topic irrelevant fluff.

As MTV is to Music…
As TWC is to Weather…

So is The Science Channel to Science. (Ghost hunters, etc)
So is The History Channel to History. (Ancient Aliens, etc)

And now…

So is CNN to News. Oh how I remember, young ones, how CNN once did actual news.

Androgynous Cowherd says:

So, basically...

…DirecTV has reinvented what everyone in Canada has had all along? The Weather Network on cable = all weather, with some info on a bottom bar even during ads. The Weather Network on Bell Expressvu satellite can be set up to show your local data, and moreover has the push-the-red-button feature. And that can then be used to browse weather forecasts, current conditions, warnings, and other stuff for pretty much any place in Canada with a weather station if you want to.

PlagueSD says:

DirecTV on Monday unveiled a suite of new weather services for its subscribers, including a feature that allows customers to gain access to local weather information at any time…The satcaster said customers tuned to WeatherNation can press the red button on their remote to access instant local weather conditions and outlook.

There’s this wonderful invention that already does this for you. It’s called a window. You can look outside and almost immediately determine what the weather is.

JBDragon says:

Re: Re:

Except they’ve been broadcasting lame reality shows already!!! That’s part of the problem. you want the weather, and you have Reality programming. I’m glad it’s gone. These company’s want to jack their rates up, especially for the crap they play, I hope they get dropped, booted, whatever. There’s going to be someone else to take it’s place. It may not be the SAME, but that could be a good thing.

madasahatter (profile) says:

Weather

What people need is the weather where they live and if they are travelling at the destination and along their route. Otherwise, they really do not need to know much the details in other areas. What they need to know is the direction and intensity of the weather fronts and when they will arrive locally.

With ice storm in Atlanta at least two local TV stations are continuously covering the storm with frequent forecast updates. Since I am in the metro Atlanta area, I need to know what will happen tonight in Atlanta. The local media is doing an admirable job of covering the story so why would I even watch the Weather Channel.

Jill (profile) says:

The Weather Channel and Directv

I support Directv. So glad the Weather Channel is gone and we now have WeatherNation. I am pleased. But I am afraid the Weather Channel will be back some day. Like when the carriage contract ends with NBC. NBC/Universal can just add The Weather Channel to this block of channels and Directv will certainly cave to keep CNBC. So afraid this might happen , but hoping it doesn’t.

JBDragon says:

Re: Kudos to DirecTV

They’ll never drop your bill!!! It’ll just help keep them from jacking prices up. They keep jacking prices up and people like myself FLEE!!! I now have a nice large Antenna and record that way. Then there is this thing called the internet where I can pretty much watch anything and everything I want anyway. As for the weather, “I Have a App for that!!!”

Nargg (profile) says:

The old days....

At the risk of sounding old-fashioned, I do prefer the older days of Cable and Satellite channel programming. CNN was pure news, and nothing else. TWC was boring repeated weather (not a BAD thing!) MTV was music only. Exclusive content was a totally different concept, not multi-million dollar drama fests. Fewer movie channels, which made things easier to find. Today’s TV content is a mess, a total mess. And more commercials now than ever, so why do we even pay for TV when all we seem to pay for is commercials?!?! Seems wrong.

Anonymous Coward says:

Weather Underground

While the previously mentioned weather.gov is very good, I really like Weather Underground.

http://www.wunderground.com/

Besides more data on a city forecast, you can also find historical data on the site. However, for me the best thing is that they provide access to the network of local monitoring stations. When I want, I can get rainfall totals from 3 blocks away, not just what happened at the airport on the other side of the county.

There’s also an API, but I haven’t found the time to play with it yet.

John R says:

Old Hat

But DirecTV also had a local weather button on The Weather Channel.

One problem that DirecTV hasn’t solved for all their channels is live rescheduling. When a sports show runs overtime, the DVR’s schedule should know that — so it can record the desired show properly (whether you’re trying to record the sports show, or record the following show). This also applied to The Weather Channel’s overriding non-weather programming when weather events were happening.

JeremyR says:

This isn't anything new

There was the same functionality when the Weather Channel was on Direct TV – you just press the red button and got the local weather.

But when they switched to Weather Nation, they didn’t have that. It took them a few weeks to get it up and running.

There’s a big difference between Weather Nation and the Weather Channel, but the local weather is not new.

(And at #5 – not everyone has a smart phone. Indeed, I imagine one of the main reasons to use DirecTV in the first place is you don’t have the option of cable or have decent wireless coverage. Sure, a heavy rain will knock DirecTV out, but anything short of that it works steady enough)

gary (profile) says:

Good riddance: TWC

TWC lost me when they bought into the global warming, I mean “climate change” crap. What a bunch of hooey (FACT: No warming for over 15 years…the computer models were wrong) And then they started naming winter storms, give me a break. Whats next, naming tornadoes?

Just go to the NOAA web site, type in a zip code and you have all the weather information you could ever need without all the blathering of those TWC goofs

Niall (profile) says:

Re: Good riddance: TWC

You mean the climate change that 97% of climate scientists agree on, that even right-wing governments in any other country but the US agree on?

You mean the warming ‘pause’ that’s been shown to be because of stronger Pacific winds? You mean the 15-year ‘pause’ that’s a mere flash-in-the-pan?

What next, gonna deny HIV=AIDS, evolution and vaccines?

Dagnabbit_42 says:

This take is not accurate

I have no sympathy for reality shows and the like.

And, yeah, the Weather Channel did show too much of that for a while.

But they actually started reducing that in favor of returning to weather-heavy content some 6 months ago.

And one thing they do well is on-the-spot reporting and very location-specific info.

That’s what’s not-so-good about the fly-by-night crew that replaced Weather Channel on DirecTv: It’s basically a region-wide weather forecast on like a 3-hour loop that doesn’t even update. So the level of information detail and current-ness is worse.

And more than that…have you seen it? I think they just do a kind of cheesy Wayne’s World kind of job.

All that’s to say: I’d lean towards Weather Channel. And if I lived out in the sticks where you can’t get cable and Weather Channel was the main reason I wanted DirecTv? I’d be peeved if they dropped it for that low-budget replacement and still charged me the same.

Corky Boyd (profile) says:

Direct TV/Weathe Channel

When I first heard Direct TV was dropping the Weather Channel, I quickly flipped to channel 362, just two clicks away from Fox News. But it was still there (so I thought) with colorful graphics and eye catching presenters. Later I saw a logo that wasn’t Weather Channel, it was Weather Nation.

What chutzpa the Weather Channel has to claim we are in earthly danger by not being able to see their version of the weather. They are trying to get congressional legislation to save their tails. In reality the networks and the cable channels should be the ones paying the cable and satellite providers to carry their programming rather than the other way around. The cable providers got their start because of the crummy signals local TV stations were putting out.

Dave K says:

Didn't even notice

I didn’t even notice DirecTV dropped TWC because we hardly ever watched it. We rely on our local weather and if something major is going on, our local radar is more accurate than theirs was. I also check the radar online either on the PC or our Kindle. TWC used to provide a unique service but these days, you have plenty of options.

Add Your Comment

Your email address will not be published.

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here

Comment Options:

Make this the or (get credits or sign in to see balance) what's this?

What's this?

Techdirt community members with Techdirt Credits can spotlight a comment as either the "First Word" or "Last Word" on a particular comment thread. Credits can be purchased at the Techdirt Insider Shop »

Follow Techdirt

Techdirt Daily Newsletter

Techdirt Deals
Techdirt Insider Discord
The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...
Loading...