Governments Have A Long History Of Calling Journalists 'Traitors' When They Publish Embarassing Materials

from the a-little-history-lesson dept

It’s been somewhat incredible to watch government officials try to claim that reporters covering the NSA revelations from Ed Snowden’s leaked documents are somehow “traitors.” Last week, in the UK, the head of MI5, Andrew Parker, made a fool of himself going around telling other newspapers that The Guardian had somehow helped terrorists. However, as Amy Davidson at the New Yorker reminds us, when the government suddenly starts calling journalists “traitors,” it pays to be skeptical, because it’s most likely that the government is just very embarrassed about some news that makes them look bad.

Davidson relays the story of “the Spiegel Affair” from 1962, in which German officials went completely insane in attacking Der Spiegel for supposedly “putting lives at risk” by revealing 41 “highly classified state secrets.” Officials also claimed that the publisher and the reporter were fleeing the country and needed to be stopped and arrested. The publication’s offices had to be raided. Of course, it all later turned out to be almost entirely bogus. The report was certainly embarrassing to German officials — highlighting how ill-prepared the country was in the case of an attack, because a simulation had resulted in fifteen million West Germans dead. Many of the official claims were outright lies (like the publisher skipping town to Cuba, which never happened). While that doesn’t mean that reporters can’t sometimes reveal too much, it’s a good reminder that when the government flips its lid in situations like this, it pays to take the claims with a very large grain of salt.

The key paragraph from Davidson makes the point clear:

The professional secret-keepers are phenomenally bad at distinguishing between the threat of terror and their terror at being threatened—or worse, as with Strauss, at being humiliated. They need the press not just to shake them up but also to keep them from being destabilized by their own weaknesses and vanities.

We’ve discussed at length the overclassification problem in the government, and this is all a symptom of that. The government likes to overclassify things that may embarrass government officials — and thus they tend to overreact when those things eventually come out. This is, in part, because of the embarrassing information, but also because of the attempt to cover up the embarrassment, which only makes the whole thing worse.

Either way, this historical example is good to remember as we continue to see government officials make fanciful claims without any evidence to support them about how much the Chelsea Manning or Ed Snowden leaks have “harmed” our safety.

Filed Under: , , , , , ,

Rate this comment as insightful
Rate this comment as funny
You have rated this comment as insightful
You have rated this comment as funny
Flag this comment as abusive/trolling/spam
You have flagged this comment
The first word has already been claimed
The last word has already been claimed
Insightful Lightbulb icon Funny Laughing icon Abusive/trolling/spam Flag icon Insightful badge Lightbulb icon Funny badge Laughing icon Comments icon

Comments on “Governments Have A Long History Of Calling Journalists 'Traitors' When They Publish Embarassing Materials”

Subscribe: RSS Leave a comment
Disgusted says:

Nothing to see here, move along.

The thing all of these government idiots keep forgetting is that eventually ALL of their “secrets” will come out. They, of course, fervently hope that they are out of office and beyond prosecution when that happens. Note the word “hope”. Eventually, none of their classification will hide their misdeeds.

That Anonymous Coward (profile) says:

It is an old trope that always pays off.

When, once upon a time, there were a few brave congresscritters who dared to question what was happening in the wake of 9-11. They were labeled terrorist lovers, and quickly shut the hell up. Stirring up jingoistic, xenophobic, and racist feelings wasn’t that hard in a country where people are told your life is worse because of ‘bad people’.

Now years later the terrorist lover trope isn’t nearly as powerful, because the average person is mostly aware that many of the knee jerk reactions are theater meant to line the pockets of contributors.

Now when anyone shows wrongdoing, they are traitors selling us out to the terrorists!!! We have our representatives allowing people to lie to them, and repeating lies as facts to support a narrative that keeps the campagin funds flowing.

Maybe it is time to consider that the real traitors are those who are lying to our faces. That they are exploiting the imaginary fears they created in citizens to keep control.

Anonymous Coward says:

And Cameron took orders

Four things happened:

1) MI5’s Andrew Parker did an attack on the free press making vague claims.
2) The fake-press under MI5’s thumb, did their propaganda piece repeating the vague unsubstantiated claims.
3) The comments section of those papers were deluged with death threats to the Guardian, Glenn Greenwald, and Snowden, re-inforcing Parker’s attack.
4) Prime Minister Cameron was forced to back Parker.

I suspect the comments are astroturf, because the claims were weak and not backed by any common sense. Who has strong views about weak claims? Only PR men and astroturf.

I suspect it was coordinated with Parker’s comment, and maybe even Parker knew about it because of its timing. Companies need hiring, staff prepped, refer to HBGary Wikileaks from 2011. That leak also showed HBGary wanting to attack Glenn Greenwald.

So what we have is a spook in a free country driving government policy to attack the free press.

Parker has no business doing this. Nobody elected him.
He doesn’t dispute the truthfulness of the crimes reported by the Guardian, he has made no prosecutable allegations to the police.

He needs to resign and apologize.

Techdirt article of HBGary attack on Glenn Greenwald from 2011. Parker is siding with this attack by acting as an agent to achieve it:

That Anonymous Coward (profile) says:

Re: And Cameron took orders

Palantir was the platform they wanted to use for those attacks… funny didn’t they just get a bunch of funding?

Just think the same tools that can be used to spy on people, can be used to create illusions of wrongdoing.

madasahatter (profile) says:

True treason

Publishing embarrassing but (over)classified information is not treason. What the dimbulbs forget is that other intelligence agencies are often very good at finding this information out and using it.

Most real traitors are funneling secret information for money or because of other loyalties. The information they are sending is usually highly technical such as keys to codes not internal gossip.

Anonymous Coward says:

the behaviour of governments, particularly like the USA and the UK shows how scared the leaders are of being kicked out of office. from what has been disclosed about the various happenings in both countries, it cant come soon enough. no country should give away the privacy and freedom that has meant so much to the people, in return for feeling safe most of the time. no one wants anything bad to happen but we are creating our own terrorist societies within government. that has to stop!!

Uriel-238 (profile) says:

So in short...

When a government resents freedom of the press, or tries to pass reactionary regulations on what the press can say, that’s how we know the press is serving its intended civic function.

As of this posting I have not received a US National Security Letter or any classified gag order from an agent of the United States
Encrypted with Morbius-Cochrane Perfect Steganographic Codec 1.2.001
Monday, October 21, 2013 12:44:31 PM
loft legs sign birthday rank termite hosepipe beast

Add Your Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here

Comment Options:

Make this the or (get credits or sign in to see balance) what's this?

What's this?

Techdirt community members with Techdirt Credits can spotlight a comment as either the "First Word" or "Last Word" on a particular comment thread. Credits can be purchased at the Techdirt Insider Shop »

Follow Techdirt

Techdirt Daily Newsletter

Techdirt Deals
Techdirt Insider Discord
The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...