Twitter Diplomacy? New Iranian Officials Use Twitter To Make Surprising Moves To Cool Tensions Over Israel And Nukes

from the kind-of-amazing-when-you-think-about-it dept

Here’s a fairly incredible story. The Iranian government is quite well known for stifling dissent and trying to limit the internet. However, we noted recently that the new President of Iran had made some surprisingly progressive statements about ending internet censorship and filtering, and supporting human rights. Obviously, it’s easy to say things, while actually doing things is quite different. Even so, it’s still surprising to see two recent tweets out of the Iranian government that suggest that perhaps they’re really looking to ease certain tensions and move towards more peaceful relationships. The Back Channel blog has the details of the two key tweets, starting with surprising tweets from both the new President Hassan Rouhani and Foreign Minister Javad Zarif wishing Jews a Happy Rosh Hashanah.

As you probably know, Iran doesn’t exactly have the best reputation with Jews, and its former President regularly threatened to go to war with Israel. Knowing a few Persian Jews who fled that country years ago, even any suggestion of a conciliation towards Jews is a stunning point. And, it went even further. Nancy Pelosi’s daughter, Christine Pelosi, responded to Zarif’s tweet, stating that it would be better if Iran stopped denying the Holocaust:

Amazingly, she got back a response, in which Zarif said that Iran does not deny the Holocaust, and that “the man who is perceived to be denying it is gone now,” obviously referring to Ahmadinejad.

Zarif later confirmed to reporters that it was really him who was tweeting those messages and also that he recognized he was tweeting with Nancy Pelosi’s daughter.

The other interesting tweet came from President Rouhani, noting a change in who controlled Iran’s nuclear efforts, and also signalling a greater willingness to have a “constructive interaction” with the world on this:

This, also, is a pretty big deal, and while I’m sure many will (rightfully) view the whole thing with skepticism, one can also be hopeful that this is a sign of a real shift in policies from Iran.

But perhaps even more interesting is the fact that this is all happening over Twitter. The fact that Zarif and Pelosi could have an exchange like that is fairly astounding once you think about it. That sort of thing was basically impossible just a few years ago. The ability to do diplomacy via social media is quite amazing. It really was just a year and a half ago that we were somewhat amazed (and also hopeful) that various citizens of both Israel and Iran were reaching out to each other via Facebook, to try to build direct connections and a hopeful sense of peace between citizens, but we wondered if the same sort of thing would ever extend up to the politicians and those in power. While we’re not there yet, it’s at least nice to see some sort of encouraging sign.

The ability to actually communicate and relate to one another as human beings rather than as caricatures is incredibly powerful. It can (and will) be abused at times, but we can still hope for good results and be encouraged when we see potential signs of it happening.

Filed Under: , , , , , , , ,
Companies: twitter

Rate this comment as insightful
Rate this comment as funny
You have rated this comment as insightful
You have rated this comment as funny
Flag this comment as abusive/trolling/spam
You have flagged this comment
The first word has already been claimed
The last word has already been claimed
Insightful Lightbulb icon Funny Laughing icon Abusive/trolling/spam Flag icon Insightful badge Lightbulb icon Funny badge Laughing icon Comments icon

Comments on “Twitter Diplomacy? New Iranian Officials Use Twitter To Make Surprising Moves To Cool Tensions Over Israel And Nukes”

Subscribe: RSS Leave a comment
Anonymous Howard (profile) says:

Iran's nuclear negotiations

It’d be fairly interesting if Iran started to build thorium reactors. Thorium cannot be used to make nuclear weapons, has much higher energy density (like 60x of u-235) and much more safe than uranium reactors.

The only problem is because it’s abundant, a byproduct of rare-earth production, nuclear fuel contractors don’t invest in reactor building -> much higher cost on the government.

So, in exchange for the assurance of israel and the us that iran won’t make nukes, these two should make ample donations for the program.

art guerrilla (profile) says:

well, just *seems* like a big deal...

…’cause we have been exposed to propaganda about eye-ran for so long…

like so many other ‘issues’ which were mini-false-flags, achminawhateverthefuckhisnamewas (yes, the irony…) did not have the views ascribed to him as reported in our media…

it was generally a lot more subtle than that…
but, since eye-ran were teh evil, NOTHING they said could be construed as ‘positive’/good, and EVERYTHING they said was spun as threatening…

same ole same ole: unka sam bullhorning everyone else down, so truth was perverted, and lies were promulgated…
just another day in Empire…

art guerrilla
aka ann archy

Erik Jay (profile) says:

Re: Blimey - thank you, you speak for me, as well

I feel as if I wrote your post, as I have exactly the same skepticism about government pronouncements. Further, I then had the same emotional reaction you did to the tale, so I got that old feeling again, one now so rare that its impact is disorienting — hope. Hope, with a little love thrown in, can move mountains. Good thing, too: There are lots of them between where we are right now, as a nation, and where we need to be — moving back over that red line we ALL crossed, called apathy, and toward freedom once again.

Pragmatic says:

This is probably a response to the likely strikes on Syria, since that nation is a key ally of Iran and the war hawks are screaming for an attack on Iran. With Syria gone, they’d have no allies, so they’re making nice in the hope of persuading the world that attacking them would be a bad thing.

They’re not a real threat and never have been, they’re just sitting on an ocean of oil and are friendly with Syria. All the Israel-baiting was just bravado, red meat for the base. However, it can’t be denied that they’ve been involved in terrorism; what I’m saying is, a full-scale war was always out of the question.

It might be worth reading this:'%C3%A9tat to get some background on US-Iranian relationships


Anonymous Coward says:

On Twitter, we are all the same

There is no real distinction (other than perhaps a minuscule flag saying it has been verified as real) between the Twitter account of a president and the Twitter account of a homeless man. They are all the same.

Twitter flattens hierarchies. A nobody can talk to a VIP and a VIP talk to a nobody, just as easily as a nobody can talk to another nobody.

Trails (profile) says:

Please add salt

The challenge with Iran is that the president rules with the consent of the mullahs. The theocracy wields the ultimate power.

They also have an established pattern of looking like they’ll allow reform, and those who stick up their heads lose their heads.

While I would love to see change in Iran, even taking the new president at face value doesn’t carry much weight as the mullahs are the final authority in Iran.

Add Your Comment

Your email address will not be published.

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here

Comment Options:

Make this the or (get credits or sign in to see balance) what's this?

What's this?

Techdirt community members with Techdirt Credits can spotlight a comment as either the "First Word" or "Last Word" on a particular comment thread. Credits can be purchased at the Techdirt Insider Shop »

Follow Techdirt

Techdirt Daily Newsletter

Techdirt Deals
Techdirt Insider Discord
The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...