President Obama Says He Learns What NSA Is Doing From The Press, Then Goes To NSA For Details

from the uh,-that's-not-how-it's-supposed-to-work dept

Ewan MacAskill calls out a rather astounding statement by President Obama during his most recent press conference in St. Petersburg at the G20 summit. The very last question, which I believe is asked by AFP reporter Tangi Quemener, asks President Obama to respond to some of the recent NSA leaks, in particular the spying on Brazilian and Mexican officials. The President gives the usual long and winding answer about doing what intelligence agencies do, and various costs and benefits, but then there’s this:

Now, just more specifically, then, on Brazil and Mexico. I said that I would look into the allegations. I mean, part of the problem here is we get these through the press and then I’ve got to go back and find out what’s going on with respect to these particular allegations — I don’t subscribe to all these newspapers, although I think the NSA does — now at least. (Laughter.)

Leaving aside the “joke” at the end, the admission is rather startling. Here is the President of the US admitting two astounding things. First, it appears that he and the NSA really have no clue at all what information Ed Snowden walked away with, and second (and worse), it appears that the President is admitting that he doesn’t know what the NSA is doing and is similarly learning these facts from the press. This comes from the same President who has repeatedly insisted that there is plenty of oversight over these programs. If that’s true, then he shouldn’t be taken by surprise when the press reveals what the NSA is doing, and shouldn’t have to “go back and find out what’s going on.” He’s more or less admitting that there’s no oversight and the NSA is a rogue agency making its own rules, only checked on when the press reveals something.

Filed Under: , , , ,

Rate this comment as insightful
Rate this comment as funny
You have rated this comment as insightful
You have rated this comment as funny
Flag this comment as abusive/trolling/spam
You have flagged this comment
The first word has already been claimed
The last word has already been claimed
Insightful Lightbulb icon Funny Laughing icon Abusive/trolling/spam Flag icon Insightful badge Lightbulb icon Funny badge Laughing icon Comments icon

Comments on “President Obama Says He Learns What NSA Is Doing From The Press, Then Goes To NSA For Details”

Subscribe: RSS Leave a comment
39 Comments
Anonymous Coward says:

In all fairness, it looks to me like a fairly expected statement that he’s not aware of all the nitty gritty details and would need to ask the NSA for a detailed briefing to ascertain the validity of the accusations.

I can certainly imagine that, for example, Obama would only be interested in hearing what the president of Brazil was planning on doing, with minimal interest as to the details how they’re getting that information in that particular case.

Anonymous Coward says:

Re: Re:

Actually he has been saying earlier that he doesn’t believe the leaks tell the truth. In this case I would interpret what he says as him finding the leaks so biased that he has to hear the other side of the story or even as plain old dismissal of the leaks and finding the truth that gave birth to the rumours.

Having national security as a religion politicians follow doesn’t seem fair. Nor is it balanced… Preferably politicians would educate themself more on this particular subject instead of relying on pure head under arm political religion since it is guaranteed to be 100 % one-sided lobbying for more funding given the secrecy and thereby lack of civil concerns getting heard. If they somehow got the monopoly lobbying out of Washington, it would remove the city completely from the map…

out_of_the_blue says:

Classic "I'm a fool" statement, as only other choice is KNAVE.

I’m ready for next item. — But you are visibly burning out your fanboys on NSA, Mike. That’s part of the purpose of a limited hangout: make everyone sick of the topic so bored replaces anger, get accustomed so that next revelation isn’t even looked at. You play along with that so well.

Wally (profile) says:

Re: Classic "I'm a fool" statement, as only other choice is KNAVE.

Obama was stupid enough to get into a “he said/she said” argument…that’s what I got from it.

Mind you blue, this is actually pretty bad since Obama kept parroting the NSA’s defensive words to the public….that was before he admitted seeing it in the press. That means when accusations flew at the administration about the NSA, he didn’t ask a source conducive to the general opinion of the people about the NSA spying…which happens to be what the press is reporting..that we do not like being spied like that.

Two things are revealed about Obama.

1. As nice as he is, he is extremely manipulative. The first evidence of this was when he was a senator…he would always protest against a bill being passed through only to vote for its passing when it came time to vote.

2. He has no empathy…otherwise he would have counseled with the press rather than ordering all their phone records.

Gwiz (profile) says:

Re: Re:

I think the term you are looking for is “plausible deniability.” If he knows what the NSA is doing he can be held accountable for it.

I guess that’s possible, but if that’s true, wouldn’t a Constitutional law scholar’s most natural reaction to news of the NSA spying on Americans be: “They’re doing fucking what??” not something like “I dunno what’s up with that, I’ll look into it”?

Anonymous Coward says:

You mean he is finally realizing that claiming the NSA has good oversight and his backing of this agency could have serious ramifications to him personally and has to say something to cya?

Look he’s been carrying water for the NSA ever since this Snowden crap happened. He’s been pushing for espionage charges for whistle blowers while not paying a bit of attention to the exposures they brought forth and punishing the real criminals. I’m afraid this doesn’t cover his ass but makes it all the more vulnerable. Evidently, when it comes to the NSA everyone in charge of oversight is asleep at the wheel at best or is complicit in the cover up on purpose. Take your pick, neither speaks well of what the government is doing.

Anonymous Coward says:

No surprise there, at least for me.
I have known for a looooooooooooooooong time that no pencil pusher knows exactly what happens at the whole of the system, they know very narrow things about it all and this includes the president not only of the US but all other countries as well.

With that said, it is surprising to get the president of the US that is supposed to have dozens of people to look into those things say after the fact that he get more information from the press than he is able to get from the NSA.

Ok, I believe him, he is incompetent and can’t keep a rogue agency in check.

Now the important part, can we do something?
Not really, unless people start getting serious about politics and start mapping the relationships that agencies have with each other and who is put in place, nothing will change,changing the president or even congress is not enough anymore, they don’t get their facts from thin air it comes from somewhere and that place is where the real power is right now.

slinkySlim (profile) says:

And this is why I am quite comfortable in my belief that the country is not run the way that we are led to believe it is run. Politicians, seemingly, are more the arbiters of fiction, facts and money. The country is *run* by law enforcement and the world is manipulated by defense and it is precisely here that the root of the problems lie – the Departments of X, Y and Z. The rest is simply a money trail.

Anonymous Coward says:

Re: Re:

Sadly the ship of dunces known as the republican party is focusing on the stupidest possible non-reasons for impeachment and only serving to discredit that option when they have real actual scandals bombarding them. Guess they’re too onboard with the spooks, “National Security”, and the various Industrial-Complexes to touch thelegitimate reasons.

Horrified says:

Im… Horrified by this. I was having a discussion about this with my brother the other day, in relation to the fact that given Obama’s last few statements about the NSA that it was teally looking more and more like there only 3 possibilites. A) That he was just bullshitting his way through and had no idea what was going on (incompetence?), that the NSA was actively lying to him (conspiracy much?), or that he was deliberately lying to us (thus untrustworthy?). To have one of those actually confirmed by his own mouth … Thats terrifying to think that our own elected leader has no idea what his branch of the goverent is doing.

Add Your Comment

Your email address will not be published.

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here

Comment Options:

Make this the or (get credits or sign in to see balance) what's this?

What's this?

Techdirt community members with Techdirt Credits can spotlight a comment as either the "First Word" or "Last Word" on a particular comment thread. Credits can be purchased at the Techdirt Insider Shop »

Follow Techdirt

Techdirt Daily Newsletter

Techdirt Deals
Techdirt Insider Discord
The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...
Loading...