John Steele Shows Up In Judge Wright's Court; Bet He Wishes He Hadn't

from the so-you-made-it? dept

While John Steele insisted he only “just” found out about the hearing in Judge Wright’s courtroom today, and insisted that it would be nearly impossible to make it, with Judge Wright quickly rejecting Steele’s request, it appears that Steele somehow found a way to get to the courtroom on time this morning. And, while I’m sure that not showing up would have been a really bad decision, that doesn’t mean that being present was a particularly enjoyable experience. Adam Steinbaugh was in the courtroom and has a detailed writeup of the continually no-nonsense Judge Wright’s latest opportunity to respond verbally and in-person to John Steele’s nonsense.

If you don’t recall, the specific hearing was in response to Steele’s motion for sanctions against Morgan Pietz for supposedly violating Steele’s due process rights in “not serving” him the documents in the case since Steele began representing himself (“pro se”). As pretty much everyone who has been following the case has noted, the idea that Steele was not actually aware of the filings is pretty close to nil, and the decision to play more “playing dumb” games in front of Judge Wright — who has made it abundantly clear that he is not impressed with John Steele’s games — is looking increasingly bad.

Steele appears to be betting heavily that arguing that his due process rights were violated is his best chance to somehow emerge from the deep pile of trouble that he’s in. He’s going to have a rather difficult time making that case, though, he must (at the very least) have to know that Judge Wright was going to shred him to pieces today — and then hope he can make some progress in the inevitable appeal. That’s still going to be a long shot, and I imagine that Judge Wright is going to do everything possible to make it abundantly clear to the judges handling the appeal just how ridiculous Steele’s claim is — starting with the details of today’s hearing.

Judge Wright walked in promptly at the scheduled time. The first thing he noted is that Steele and other Prenda affiliates had kept submitting last-minute documents to the court, as late as this morning. Paul Hansmeier, for instance, had filed a motion to appear by telephone—“for what, I don’t know,” mused Wright, as Hansmeier’s motion was not the subject of the hearing.

He didn’t like all the new filings, either. Among them were thick complaints from Mark Lutz and John Steele, to the California State Bar concerning former Prenda lawyer Brett Gibbs. “Why do I care?” snapped Wright. “You assumed I needed more paper?”

Defense lawyer Pietz was working with Gibbs, said Steele. Therefore, Gibbs’ misdoings were part of a “pattern of fraud” by Pietz. Wright tossed it aside: the hearing today was about Steele’s knowledge of particular filings, he said.

You get the feeling that Wright long ago had more than enough of Steele’s bullshit, and Steele either doesn’t realize that or simply can’t stop. From there, the focus was on Steele’s claims that he was unaware of what was happening in the case. Wright came prepared to have Steele explain how he could have possibly not known what was happening in the case — including with suggestions that Steele was now actively trying to set things up so he could claim he was not being served.

Then the court’s flat-screen monitors popped up with a copy of Steele’s substitution of attorney form. Had Steele ever seen this document, Wright demanded to know?

Steele sat for an awkwardly long period of time staring at the monitor before answering. “I’m sure I did at some point,” he said. Wright asked if the address was correct, and Steele said that it was not.  The incorrect address was listed twice on the form, said Wright—and it was never corrected.

Next method of contact? Steele’s e-mail address, which was sending bounce-backs to lawyers who tried to contact him. Steele said that he shut it down because of “spam and hacking and attempts to mess up not only my e-mail but websites.” At some point, he “literally could not open” his e-mail account, he said. He had used an auto-responder to tell people about his alternative address until June, he said.

Wright asked Steele if he had another e-mail address. “I have an old one,” Steele responded.  “Were you planning on letting anyone else in on it?” Wright asked, noting that the court’s Local Rules require litigants to provide an e-mail address if they have one.

Steele tried to flip the story over to his “due process” claims, and Judge Wright shut him down sarcastically. Steinbaugh’s recounting is worth reading so head on over to get all the details of that part of the exchange. It includes Wright telling Steele it’s “laughable” that Steele is claiming that opposing attorney Pietz is the one who has shown a “pattern of fraud.” Either way, Steele’s insistence that his due process rights are being violated, and that he knows he has to go through this process just to get to the appeal become quite clear:

Steele also had trouble identifying any legal authority for the motion to reconsider. He kept invoking the Fifth Amendment, saying that alone was the authority.

“How? You got this from the Fifth Amendment? This is absurd,” retorted Wright. “Last time I let you assert [the Fifth Amendment], and let you go right back to the airport!”

“That’s a different Fifth Amendment right,” responded Steele. The court’s actions here amount to an illegal “taking,” which wasn’t right. “My rights… I get them no matter what,” he said. His June motion had not been argued or heard, he said, as it was denied “within minutes.”

“You’re getting all the due process you can stand!” said Wright. Steele’s arguments had been made—by Steele. Steele, growing audibly and visibly frustrated, replied, “If Your Honor doesn’t care, [then] this is an appellate issue.”

Judge Wright also is well aware that it appears that Steele has been working closely with the rest of Team Prenda on all of these efforts, and called Steele out on that:

Wright had only a few more questions. “Who typed your papers?” he asked. Steele sheepishly responded: “I typed part of it,” and some was typed by others.

“I couldn’t help but notice [that] Peter Hansmeier’s notice, Paul Hansmeier’s notice, Mark Lutz’ notice, and your motion… all followed the exact same format,” said Wright. They even had the same footer. “They’re almost indistinguishable. No way they were not typed by the same person.”

“It’s called cutting and pasting!” Steele bellowed.

“Raise your voice again and I’m going to introduce you to the United States Marshals,” said Wright. “Get out.” Wright stood and walked off the bench.

It’s not too difficult to guess how this is going to end up, and, like so many things that John Steele seems to do in court these days, it seems fairly likely that his plan is going to backfire in a big bad way. While Steele seems to be betting on a happier outcome at the appellate level — and, is possibly even baiting Judge Wright to try to use the emotional and sarcastic responses in his own favor on appeal — there’s so much overwhelming evidence piling up against Steele, that it would be somewhat amazing if the appeals court doesn’t end up with the same conclusion as Judge Wright concerning which parties are involved in questionable behaviors here.

Filed Under: , , , ,
Companies: af holdings, prenda, prenda law

Rate this comment as insightful
Rate this comment as funny
You have rated this comment as insightful
You have rated this comment as funny
Flag this comment as abusive/trolling/spam
You have flagged this comment
The first word has already been claimed
The last word has already been claimed
Insightful Lightbulb icon Funny Laughing icon Abusive/trolling/spam Flag icon Insightful badge Lightbulb icon Funny badge Laughing icon Comments icon

Comments on “John Steele Shows Up In Judge Wright's Court; Bet He Wishes He Hadn't”

Subscribe: RSS Leave a comment
32 Comments
out_of_the_blue says:

OMG! TWO PRENDA POSTS IN ONE DAY!

Mike claims to have a degree in economics, can’t ya tell? But he really gets off on inside lawyering. Following a few exceptionally crooked lawyers closely is what he does instead of developing thoughts on copyright or patent systems and how to fix them for the benefit of all society. It’s some kind of mania, plus hell of a lot easier than thinking.

Take a loopy tour of Techdirt.com! You always end up same place!
http://techdirt.com/
Where economist Mike brags of hanging out with the really cool kids: lawyers!

RD says:

Re: OMG! TWO PRENDA POSTS IN ONE DAY!

OOTB claims to have a degree in copyright pandering and “the law is the law!” ideology, can’t ya tell? But he really gets off on attacking those who managed to succeed where he has failed all his life. Sucking the dick of Big Media and worshiping at the altar of Big Copyright is what he does instead of actually doing anything creative or constructive or successful. It’s some kind of mania, plus hell of a lot easier than thinking.

FTFY

S. T. Stone says:

Re: OMG! TWO PRENDA POSTS IN ONE DAY!

Following a few exceptionally crooked lawyers closely is what he does instead of developing thoughts on copyright or patent systems and how to fix them for the benefit of all society.

Yeah, because God forbid Techdirt ? a blog partially dedicated to calling out copyright and patent trolls ? follow the saga of a handful of crooked lawyers who attempted to use copyright trolling to pervert the function of copyright in an attempt to turn the legal system into a money-making enterprise.

Did you foolishly beat your head on the wall today, or did some stupid youth hit you with an electric appliance today? You?re no fallen angel, you know; that label exists only in your dreams, and while I believe that anything is possible, you?re not convincing me that your out-of-the-blue insanity deserves to stay together with Techdirt. What?s the old saying, silence speaks a thousand words? Something like that, I?unno; I’m losin? myself in thought here.

CK20XX (profile) says:

Re: Go play with your stuffed tiger.

Calvin: “When I grow up, I’m not going to read the newspaper and I’m not going to follow complex issues and I’m not going to vote. That way I can complain when the government doesn’t represent me. Then when everything goes down the tubes, I can say the system doesn’t work and justify my further lack of participation.”
Hobbes: “An ingeniously self-fulfilling plan.”
Calvin: “It’s a lot more fun to blame things than to fix them.”

DP says:

Re: OMG! TWO PRENDA POSTS IN ONE DAY!

I don’t OOTB has anything to shout about re. “obsessions”. He appears to have more than a few of his own. In fact I would recommend a good psychiatrist or, failing that, a strait-jacket with a special mouth and foot clamp as he is always putting his foot in his mouth – oh, a hand restraint would be good as well to stop any further totally ludicrous, irrelevant and insulting posts. This person needs taking down several pegs, but I expect he will come up against the wrong person one day in real life and it will happen.

Anonymous Coward says:

I’ve read this writeup, and I read the other writeup at Ars as well, and there’s one thing I still don’t understand:

As part of this hearing, was Steele required to provide a true and accurate e-mail address, and keep the account open for a set period of time?

If not, can’t all of these “you didn’t send it to my correct e-mail” stunts simply continue forever?

It takes less than 10 seconds to create a gmail account, and you can delete it the same day you create it.

dante866 (profile) says:

Re: Re:

The issue at hand is that by closing down the account and not supplying another email address, or by destroying the email’s, he can be considered in violation of destruction of evidence, as the claims of due process go both ways. Pietz can claim that steele is violating his due process rights by destroying email’s and not providing lines of communication. Court rules state that you have to provide a reliable method of communication for court-issued documents, and failing to do so can find you in contempt or other legal quagmires…

Arthur Moore (profile) says:

Re: Re:

I’m pretty sure that it’s part of the courts rules to have a valid E-Mail address on file. The same goes with physical addresses, and telephone number.

So he’s been violating the rules, and the judge called him on it.

I really think Judge wright is this close to slapping him with sanctions for all the bullshit he’s pulling. On the other hand, he might be giving Steele enough rope to hang himself several times over. Especially in the appellate court.

CK20XX (profile) says:

If John Steele weren’t such a blatant con artist, I might actually feel a bit sorry for him. He’s probably acting like he is because he’s poured all his money and energy into this plan, and now it’s not going like he planned and everything is falling apart. That’s a difficult thing to back out of. It’s been his reason for living for years now, and he doesn’t have any friends to fall back on anymore. To own up to anything now basically requires him to cast away his religion, which is very difficult for most people to do.

art guerrilla (profile) says:

Re: Tell me why?

because it is a ‘self-policing’ profession…

if it weren’t tragic, it would be funny…

really, tells you the his story of our society when you consider all the elites who set up ‘self-policing’ situations FOR THEMSELVES; funny us 99% can’t get away with ‘self-policing’…

funny, that…

art guerrilla
aka ann archy
eof

That One Guy (profile) says:

Re: ?You're getting all the due process you can stand!?

Not sure, but the judge might be referring to the 12-minute court case where every single one of them plead the fifth and refused to say a thing. If so, I’d imagine it would make him just a titch annoyed that Steele and co. are now whining that they ‘didn’t get their due process rights’ and ‘didn’t get to present their side of the story'(Of course if Steele and co. hadn’t had the threat of perjury charges hanging over the heads should they have been caught in a lie I’m sure they would have had plenty to say in the court that day…).

Add Your Comment

Your email address will not be published.

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here

Comment Options:

Make this the or (get credits or sign in to see balance) what's this?

What's this?

Techdirt community members with Techdirt Credits can spotlight a comment as either the "First Word" or "Last Word" on a particular comment thread. Credits can be purchased at the Techdirt Insider Shop »

Follow Techdirt

Techdirt Daily Newsletter

Techdirt Deals
Techdirt Insider Discord
The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...
Loading...