DOJ: Now That We've Been Embarrassed For Spying On Journalists, We'll Be A Little More Careful

from the until-congress-says-otherwise dept

Right before the Snowden leaks came out, you may recall there were some other controversies, involving the DOJ spying on reporters, including claiming that reporter James Rosen was an “aider, abettor or co-conspirator” in order to get access to his emails and phone records. In response to this controversy, President Obama… put Attorney General Eric Holder in charge of investigating these efforts, despite the fact that it was under Eric Holder’s watch that these things happened.

In response, the DOJ is apparently revamping its guidelines to make it slightly more difficult for them to do what they already did:

The new guidelines, which the official said would take effect almost immediately, would prevent the Federal Bureau of Investigation from portraying a reporter as a co-conspirator in a criminal leak as a way to get around a legal bar on secret search warrants for reporting materials, as an agent did in a recently revealed search warrant affidavit involving a Fox News reporter.

They would also make it harder — though not impossible — for prosecutors to obtain a journalist’s calling records from telephone companies without giving news organizations advance notice…

According to that report at the NY Times, the DOJ also said that it can’t do any more unless laws are changed:

“This is as far as the department can go on its own until Congress passes the media shield legislation,” the Justice Department official said

That’s simply not true. The DOJ’s guidelines are just that: guidelines. They can set pretty clear guidelines for themselves that make it clear that the DOJ will not spy on reporters’ communications with sources. But they’re choosing not to do so. Either way, all of this seems (yet again) like a reaction to them being called out on questionable behavior. They made no effort to fix these guidelines until what they were doing came out in the news. It’s difficult to take the DOJ seriously when they promise to change after they’ve been caught.

Filed Under: , , , , , , ,

Rate this comment as insightful
Rate this comment as funny
You have rated this comment as insightful
You have rated this comment as funny
Flag this comment as abusive/trolling/spam
You have flagged this comment
The first word has already been claimed
The last word has already been claimed
Insightful Lightbulb icon Funny Laughing icon Abusive/trolling/spam Flag icon Insightful badge Lightbulb icon Funny badge Laughing icon Comments icon

Comments on “DOJ: Now That We've Been Embarrassed For Spying On Journalists, We'll Be A Little More Careful”

Subscribe: RSS Leave a comment
12 Comments
ranpel (profile) says:

What?

The Department of Trust Us.

The Department of Back of Bus.

The Department of Weed Bust.

The Department of dog killing, freedom chilling, zap chap villain cunts with misappropriated and maligned authority.

What do you call it when the law is lawless? The authority of enforcing the rule of law is completely out of fucking control. Completely.

I blame lawmakers.

And nobody is held to account, at all. Do these guys expect me to give a fuck? Fuck you! I’m smoking it.

Guardian says:

this is quickly becoming a reason to ask for UN sanctions

this is quickly becoming a reason to ask for UN sanctions iranian style to show you what its like to MESS WITH HUMANITY…..

330 million people in the usa 7.1 billion on earth did i vote for this bullshit NOT living in the usa..NOPE, did i ask to be peeping tomed on ….NOPE…

you Americans are one fucked up nation ….and i don’t see it working out for a long time, cause your chicken shit to fix the fucking problem….YOUR GOD DAMN MILITARY MACHINE…

Internet Zen Master (profile) says:

Hmmm...

“That’s simply not true. The DOJ’s guidelines are just that: guidelines. They can set pretty clear guidelines for themselves that make it clear that the DOJ will not spy on reporters’ communications with sources.”

“They’re more like guidelines anyway.”
– Mr. Gibbs, Pirates of the Caribbean

That line immediately popped into my head while reading this.

Add Your Comment

Your email address will not be published.

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here

Comment Options:

Make this the or (get credits or sign in to see balance) what's this?

What's this?

Techdirt community members with Techdirt Credits can spotlight a comment as either the "First Word" or "Last Word" on a particular comment thread. Credits can be purchased at the Techdirt Insider Shop »

Follow Techdirt

Techdirt Daily Newsletter

Techdirt Deals
Techdirt Insider Discord
The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...
Loading...