Eric Holder's 'Off-The-Record' Meeting With Journalists Leads To 'On-The-Record' Quotes, But Not Much Else

from the blah-de-blah-blah dept

Remember how Eric Holder wanted to hold a meeting with a bunch of journalists as he seeks to revise the “guidelines” the DOJ sets up for itself (fox watching the hen house, anyone?) on how it spies on journalists? A meeting where many top news organizations refused to go because it was officially “off the record?” In the end, the media seemed to be split on whether or not to go, as summarized by the Huffington Post (who didn’t go):

Not going: New York Times, AP, Huffington Post, McClatchy, CNN, CBS News, Fox News, Reuters, and NBC News.

Going: The Washington Post, Politico, Wall Street Journal, Los Angeles Times/ Chicago Tribune, ABC News, Bloomberg, USA Today.

And then, for all the fuss, at the end of the meeting, DOJ officials told the reporters they could discuss “in general some of the ideas that were discussed,” though it appears that some points still remained off the record. As for what was publicly disclosed, it sounds like reporters were not impressed.

At the session, Holder and Deputy Attorney General James Cole expressed a willingness to revise the guidelines for such investigations, journalists present at the get-together told POLITICO.

But Holder stopped short of offering any concrete changes to the guidelines. Instead, the Attorney General sought to assure the journalists that he and the DOJ were trying to seek a balance between the demands of national security and the free flow of information, and sought suggestions from the journalists on how those changes might be achieved.

Ah, so the hens get to suggest to the fox how they’d like their rights to be violated, and then the fox gets to decide how best to “incorporate those suggestions”? I’m sure that will work out just great. As some who were in attendance noted, nothing in the meeting suggested that the DOJ was actually going to change or adjust its policies.

Filed Under: , , , ,

Rate this comment as insightful
Rate this comment as funny
You have rated this comment as insightful
You have rated this comment as funny
Flag this comment as abusive/trolling/spam
You have flagged this comment
The first word has already been claimed
The last word has already been claimed
Insightful Lightbulb icon Funny Laughing icon Abusive/trolling/spam Flag icon Insightful badge Lightbulb icon Funny badge Laughing icon Comments icon

Comments on “Eric Holder's 'Off-The-Record' Meeting With Journalists Leads To 'On-The-Record' Quotes, But Not Much Else”

Subscribe: RSS Leave a comment
Anonymous Coward says:

1) Journalists need to be spied upon because they might publish tidbits of confidential information.

2) Low level army personnel leaking evidence of war crimes is treason.

3) Bankers aiding and abetting terrorists is ok.

4) Bankers laundering drug money is ok.

5) High level politicians outing under cover people is ok.

There seems to be a pattern here.

Anonymous Coward says:

Re: Re:

“They impeached Nixon for less than the shit Obama has pulled.”

Republican Nixon resigned before the impeachment process was completed to avoid the shame.

Oh, and please list the “shit” Republican Nixon, in fact, did and the “shit” Obama’s been accused of, but not proven, unless you know of something that has, in fact, been proven in a court of law.

Anonymous Coward says:

Re: Re:

They impeached Nixon for less than the shit Obama has pulled.

In Nixon’s time it was standard for powers-that-be to maintain a believable facade of lawful government. People expected a lot more from politicians then. While they are not necessarily any more honest than they are today, politicians had to work harder back then.

Add Your Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here

Comment Options:

Make this the or (get credits or sign in to see balance) what's this?

What's this?

Techdirt community members with Techdirt Credits can spotlight a comment as either the "First Word" or "Last Word" on a particular comment thread. Credits can be purchased at the Techdirt Insider Shop »

Follow Techdirt

Techdirt Daily Newsletter

Techdirt Deals
Techdirt Insider Discord
The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...