Kitchen Nightmares Lawyers Threaten Infamous Samy And Amy If They Talk About Their Experience On The Show

from the hmmm dept

Last week we wrote about the crazy mess that followed the recent episode of the show Kitchen Nightmares on Fox, in which the star of the show, Gordon Ramsay, actually walked away from Amy’s Baking Company, after the owners, Samy and Amy Bouzaglo, didn’t take well to any criticism. After the episode aired, they were further mocked on Yelp and Reddit (Yelp “haters” were a key part of the episode), and there was an explosion of anger on the restaurant’s Facebook page, though the couple insists they were hacked.

Following all of this, however, the restaurant announced that it was doing a grand “re-opening” today, which involved a planned press conference and a “job fair” to try to hire 30 new workers. As the show noted, the Bouzaglos apparently have difficulty keeping staff employed for very long. However, the “press conference” has been cancelled. The couple claims it had to do with death threats they received, though it might have more to do with a very different kind of threat: a legal threat from the producers of the show, as reported by RadarOnline.

Lawyers representing the producers of Kitchen Nightmares, Upper Ground Enterprises, sent the couple a letter warning them that talking about the show would be a breach of contract:

We understand that you are planning a public event on May 21, 2013, at which you will discuss your experiences and your “unflattering portrayals” on the show. If you speak about the show without Upper Ground’s and Fox’s prior approval, and if you disparage the show, its host, or its producers, you will breach your obligations under Paragraph 10 of your Personal Release and Paragraph 14 of your Participant Agreement. These agreements prohibit you from speaking publicly about Kitchen Nighmares, other than to acknowledge “the mere fact of your participation in the Series in personal publicity relating to yourself.” Your conduct exposes each of you to liability for liquidated damages of $100,000.

Hmm. While this is a reminder to be careful about what sorts of gag clauses you sign before you do anything, it still seems like a highly questionable move by the producers. The more they seek to silence the couple, the more it suggests that perhaps the portrayal wasn’t entirely fair. Meanwhile, the more the couple is allowed to stay in the news, the better one would think it would be for the TV show. The couple’s actions and statements on the episode were absolutely ridiculous and clearly showed a restaurant/ownership not worth patronizing. Since then, the couple’s confirmed statements (even ignoring the Facebook comments, whether or not you believe they were the result of hackers) concerning Yelp have only served to confirm that the couple can’t take any criticism and seem to think that bad reviews of bad food are the world out to get them.

The decision to call out the gag order in the contract to silence them seems ridiculous by Fox. Even if the couple trashed the show (as expected), does anyone think that the couple has even the slightest credibility at this point? No one believes them. Pulling out the gag order makes the show look like it has something to hide.

Filed Under: , , , , ,
Companies: amy's baking company, reddit, upper ground enterprises, yelp

Rate this comment as insightful
Rate this comment as funny
You have rated this comment as insightful
You have rated this comment as funny
Flag this comment as abusive/trolling/spam
You have flagged this comment
The first word has already been claimed
The last word has already been claimed
Insightful Lightbulb icon Funny Laughing icon Abusive/trolling/spam Flag icon Insightful badge Lightbulb icon Funny badge Laughing icon Comments icon

Comments on “Kitchen Nightmares Lawyers Threaten Infamous Samy And Amy If They Talk About Their Experience On The Show”

Subscribe: RSS Leave a comment
Doug D (profile) says:

Re: Let 'em say what they want

I don’t think you could use “truth as a defense” if Fox sued. The key term is “disparage the show” and they would be sued under breach of contract, which isn’t the same as defamation. But then I’m not a lawyer nor do I play one on TV.

As far as it being a good decision to trot out the gag order,this is the same Fox that wigged out about non-licensed Jayne hats so I’m convinced they really don’t understand publicity or want a fan base.

Anonymous Coward says:

I believe Kitchen Nightmares has been sued before by someone who claimed that the show’s production staff created some of the problems at the restaurants just so that Chef Ramsey could look good fixing them.

With the couple of episodes I’ve seen of the show I wouldn’t be surprised if that was somewhat true. Since two of them had kitchens/storage rooms so filthy you had to ask “they’ve been able to pass health inspections how exactly?”.

Joshua Bardwell (profile) says:

If I had to guess, the reason for the quash is that the producers don’t want details of the show’s production to be revealed. Everybody knows that the producers of these shows edit things together and otherwise manipulate the outcome, but kind of like pro wrestling used to be–we all kind of ignore it in the interest of being entertained. If details of the manipulation come out, such as, “the producers planted those spoiled veggies,” or what-have-you, it may ruin the viewer’s ability to suspend disbelief. Even though Amy has zero credibility, reality show producers aren’t exactly high on the list of trustworthy people, and the things she may reveal may ring true enough to hurt the show.

Anonymous Coward says:

Re: Re: Re:

The show is pretty upfront about the dinner services being more crowded than usual because “word that Gordon Ramsay is in the restaurant has gotten out.” I don’t suspect that the diners are hired, but they are probably more selective in their tastes than the usual clientele at these restaurants, being Gordon Ramsay fans and all. Or perhaps they’re just more inclined to complain, being Gordon Ramsay fans and all.

Anonymous Coward says:

Re: Re: Re:

I don’t know about Kitchen Nightmares, but Hell’s Kitchen IS a bunch of out of work actors and family/friends of people on the staff. There is no actual Hell’s Kitchen restaurant, it’s just part of a TV recording studio.

That’s why some of them seem like they’re there just to make a big enough fuss to get themselves on TV, because they are.

Fushta (profile) says:

Re: Re: Re: Re:

I don’t know about Kitchen Nightmares, but Hell’s Kitchen IS a bunch of out of work actors and family/friends of people on the staff. There is no actual Hell’s Kitchen restaurant, it’s just part of a TV recording studio.

That’s why some of them seem like they’re there just to make a big enough fuss to get themselves on TV, because they are.

I’ve always thought this was true. It’s like they raid the out-of-work (or over-aged) modeling agencies in LA.

Anonymous Coward says:

Such gag agreements should be illegal. They’re only understandable when they apply to talking about the show before the air date. But saying “you can’t say anything about the show except that you were in it” and “you can’t disparage the show or anyone associated with it” has zero societal benefit, and causes societal harm.

Anonymous Coward says:

I was at a taping for Kitchen Nightmares and I didn’t see anything set up that I was aware of. In fact, the producers wanted to make sure that people weren’t just going to send stuff back, just to be on camera and talked about that before service started. So, to me, it seemed like they were trying to keep it more realistic.

horse with no name says:

You don't get it

I think they are playing all of you including the media at this point. Both sides are getting plenty of attention, and I can bet that kitchen nightmares is now a very popular topic of discussion.

It’s funny when the guy who apparently coined the Steisand effect is in fact getting played in the same way.

Anonymous Coward says:

After hearing the things my kids try to pawn off on me as excuses...

I always wondered that if those 2 were in some kind of ‘gangster/mob boss’ type trouble, and if they keep themselves in the limelight, maybe they won’t get bumped off and not thought twice about.

However, if they are well known accross the country, the hit men wouldn’t dare expose themselves to this much pagentry.

Naa…they are just a couple of old people determined not to just ‘fade away as a nobody’.

Modular kitchen South India (user link) says:

The main feature in almost any type of kitchen will certainly be the cabinetries, which is crucial and first step to begin cooking area. Many of the purchasers never ever consider the closet part, because they don’t see the closets behind the shutters whatsoever. You cooking area style and format by Modular Kitchens Bangalore will totally based upon the closets you are going to have in your kitchen.

jamie458 (profile) says:

Russell hobbs stainless electric kettle has two colour they are Eclipse polished stainless steel, and midnight blue ombre. The eclipse effect is when the sun and the moon are aligned. The gradual blend of colour creates a blue ombre effects.It has a rapid boiling means it boiled a cup of water 45 seconds (one cup of water means 235ml water). Russell hobbs hot water kettle is very light weight .it is only(1.44kg).Water capacity is (1.7 litters).This electric kettle is (3000 watts).And kettle save up to 66% energy.This kettle height is 24.5cm,length is 22.5cm and diameters is 15.8cm.

Add Your Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here

Comment Options:

Make this the or (get credits or sign in to see balance) what's this?

What's this?

Techdirt community members with Techdirt Credits can spotlight a comment as either the "First Word" or "Last Word" on a particular comment thread. Credits can be purchased at the Techdirt Insider Shop »

Follow Techdirt

Techdirt Daily Newsletter

Techdirt Deals
Techdirt Insider Discord
The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...