Icelandic Politicians Ignore Crowdsourced Constitution; Pirate Party Rejoices

from the we-know-what-happens-next dept

Techdirt has been following the fascinating saga of Iceland’s crowdsourced constitution for nearly two years. Back in October 2012, we noted that Icelandic citizens gave it a pretty big thumbs up. Reflecting that, it really looked like Iceland’s parliament might pass the associated bill, and go down in the history books for this bold re-invention of itself.

But the politicians have just put a stop to that, as Thorvaldur Gylfason explains on his blog:

32 out of 63 members of parliament were induced by an e-mail campaign organized by ordinary citizens to declare that they supported the bill and wanted to adopt it now. Despite these public declarations, however, the bill was not brought to a vote in the parliament, a heinous betrayal — and probably also an illegal act committed with impunity by the president of the parliament. Rather, the parliament decided to disrespect its own publicly declared will as well as the popular will as expressed in the national referendum by putting the bill on ice and, to add insult to injury, hastily requiring 2/3 of parliament plus 40% of the popular vote to approve any change in the constitution in the next parliament, meaning that at least 80% voter turnout would be required for a constitutional reform to be accepted in the next session of parliament.

In other words, not content with simply ignoring the will of the people to adopt this crowdsourced constitution, the Icelandic politicians have now made it even harder to bring in something in the future.

By a happy coincidence, a new Pirate Party has been formed in Iceland, and is already doing quite well given its recent formation, as Rick Falkvinge explains:

The poll gives the Icelandic Píratar 5.6% of the votes, translating to four seats in the Icelandic Parliament. This growth is nothing short of phenomenal, even within the Pirate Party movement, and it would seem that the Icelandic pirates will be the first to put people in a regular, proportional, national-level parliament. (Sweden was first with the European Parliament, Germany was first with state-level parliament, and the Czech pirates were first with a senator.)

As we’ve seen elsewhere, there’s nothing like a little outrageous behavior from mainstream politicians to drive voters into the arms of the Pirates, so Falkvinge’s understandably optimistic predictions may well turn out to be true. Let’s hope so, if only as a punishment for the contempt shown by the Icelandic parliament for its people.

Follow me @glynmoody on Twitter or, and on Google+

Filed Under: , , , ,

Rate this comment as insightful
Rate this comment as funny
You have rated this comment as insightful
You have rated this comment as funny
Flag this comment as abusive/trolling/spam
You have flagged this comment
The first word has already been claimed
The last word has already been claimed
Insightful Lightbulb icon Funny Laughing icon Abusive/trolling/spam Flag icon Insightful badge Lightbulb icon Funny badge Laughing icon Comments icon

Comments on “Icelandic Politicians Ignore Crowdsourced Constitution; Pirate Party Rejoices”

Subscribe: RSS Leave a comment
Anonymous Coward says:

“hastily requiring 2/3 of parliament plus 40% of the popular vote to approve any change in the constitution in the next parliament,”

Um. What kind of messed up constitution do they have, that one parliament can change the requirements for a future parliament to change the constitution (without passing a constitutional amendment themselves)? If that’s really how things work, I can see how they want a new one.

ReallyEvilCanine (profile) says:

Don't throw stones inside your glass house

To propose amendments to the US constitution, a joint resolution from the House and Senate must pass with a two-thirds supermajority in each.

To ratify an amendment, three-fourths of the state legislatures must approve it.

And that’s not touching the House & Senate rules which prevent most minority (? total members – 1) attempts to legislate, rules which can be changed pretty much at the Speakers’ whims.

silverscarcat says:

Re: Don't throw stones inside your glass house

Actually, you can get away with an amendment without the Congress, just so long as you can get 3/4ths of the states to go along with it.

It’s just easier (and that should tell you something) to get an amendment passed if it goes through Congress first.

Violated (profile) says:

Re: Re: Don't throw stones inside your glass house

Yes and if states wish to by-pass Congress they have to get their act together and to do so within the same month.

Most states have tried before on matters that they strongly object to but they were just never organized enough to even come close to the 3/4ths needed.

It may be possible to achieve by reminding each state the matters it did want to take up. Then to set a day where all states choose to by-pass Congress. Should the 75% level be reached then Congress no long has a say on the matter.

Each state can then send their experts to the neutral gathering point such as in Canada. They can then spend weeks or months debating how the Constitution and Bill of Rights can be changed. I would most like to see Government commercial corruption removed.

Once the amendments have been approved by large majority these states should all makes this as official as they can by putting these changes to the democratic vote of the people.

Should the people agree then the changes are passed into law and the Government is reformed under the new laws.

Anonymous Coward says:

Re: Re: Re: Don't throw stones inside your glass house

Once again. Congress still needs to pass an amendment, even if the states pass it first. You cannot “bypass Congress” when passing an amendment. Please read Article VI carefully.

Unless you’re talking about changing the Constitution without going through the Constitution.

Anonymous Coward says:

At first the pirate party was just a joke.

Then it became a small group of people across the globe.

After that we saw some minor local wins which to high up players it meant nothing.

They continued to win a little more each victory making them stronger.

Now they’re getting to the point where they’re a threat to decision makers jobs.

Next they’ll be the decision makers with a majority rule in one country first, and it will spread like wildfire.

The people are going to take back the power it’s just a matter of time.

dkc3 (profile) says:

Republicans? As if any political party Democrat, Green, Communist, Socialist, or Tea would be any different? ALL political parties and large organizations (more than just political) are all about power and self preservation.

Protecting the rights of the minorities is what a good constitution should be about and that is not easy to establish or maintain in our world.

Seems as though technology often develops the means for individuals to battle the large organizations – only to see the large organizations gain control of the very same technology and eventually use it against the individuals.

Rinse and repeat.

Add Your Comment

Your email address will not be published.

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here

Comment Options:

Make this the or (get credits or sign in to see balance) what's this?

What's this?

Techdirt community members with Techdirt Credits can spotlight a comment as either the "First Word" or "Last Word" on a particular comment thread. Credits can be purchased at the Techdirt Insider Shop »

Follow Techdirt

Techdirt Daily Newsletter

Techdirt Deals
Techdirt Insider Discord
The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...