Illinois Bill To Outlaw Online Anonymity Dropped Because People Got Pissed Off, Not Because It's Unconstitutional

from the that's-one-way-to-do-lawmaking dept

We recently wrote about Illinois state senator Ira Silverstein and his bizarre decision to push an obviously unconstitutional bill that would effectively ban anonymous speech online. Basically, any site that accepted comments or user content, would be required to get the real names and addresses of anyone who comments, or agree to pull any anonymous content. As we noted at the time, the bill appeared to be an almost exact replica of a NY state bill that was widely mocked online for being unconstitutional.

Silverstein has now pulled the bill, admitting that “the heat” the bill generated was too much, so he dropped it. But what’s truly incredible is his apparent inability to understand why people were so upset. He doesn’t seem particularly apologetic about it, though he does admit that he copied the NY bill, which he discovered while surfing the internet:

“I do a lot of reading, a lot of research, over break,” he said. “And I came across this idea that had been suggested in New York (state) as a way to combat cyberbullying. Kids can be very mean on the Internet, and I thought this might be a way of controlling that.”

So it’s another “save the children!” excuse, without, apparently, even attempting to think through the consequences (or constitutionality) of what he was proposing. For all the “reading” and “research” he did over break, you’d think he would have come across the complete tear downs of that same NY bill and why it was unconstitutional. I’m glad the bill was pulled, but it would be nicer if there was some flicker of recognition from Silverstein as to why the bill was so problematic in the first place.

Filed Under: , , ,

Rate this comment as insightful
Rate this comment as funny
You have rated this comment as insightful
You have rated this comment as funny
Flag this comment as abusive/trolling/spam
You have flagged this comment
The first word has already been claimed
The last word has already been claimed
Insightful Lightbulb icon Funny Laughing icon Abusive/trolling/spam Flag icon Insightful badge Lightbulb icon Funny badge Laughing icon Comments icon

Comments on “Illinois Bill To Outlaw Online Anonymity Dropped Because People Got Pissed Off, Not Because It's Unconstitutional”

Subscribe: RSS Leave a comment
special-interesting (profile) says:

Obviously Senator Ira Silverstein is another victim of the No Child Left Behind Act (NCLBA).

Here is a decent (and typical,there are many) article on the misguided emphasis on how the NCLBA measures only Reading Writing and Math ignoring Science and History. In local newspapers its common that teachers cry of history being passed over in place of NCLBA test score remedial classes. Thats right, special classes just to game the NCLBA test scores. Gym class? Ha! Why would gym be more important than Science and History?

Why was his first solution be to restrict the rights of citizens anyway. If he reads a lot ya think he would start with the first and fourth amendments. I wish someone would copyright the NY bill so it would vanish down the drain of eternal copyright (which actually might do some minuscule good in this case). But that would be historically bad because we need to learn from such nonsense.

For the children… he would forge chains of bondage with his limited mindset. In fact just because he mentioned the word ?children? makes me shiver anticipating future tainted legislation.

It is impossible to understate the value of anonymity in all dealings with the net so much so I question his reading list. He did not read 1984 did he? And if he did… how many brain cells are actually plugged in and powered up in his head anyway.

Heres my post on the political circus playing out daily in IL (its actually not very long); Want to be an IL politician? Its aaaall in the name.

Chronno S. Trigger (profile) says:

For the children!

“And I came across this idea that had been suggested in New York (state) as a way to combat cyberbullying. Kids can be very mean on the Internet, and I thought this might be a way of controlling that.”

Yep, let’s protect the children and only the children. You just turned 18? Well f**k you, we don’t give two shits about you now.

Anonymous Coward says:

Gag on the Morality

I?m going to guess that senator Silverstein thinks this bill was the ?good idea?.
NY State Senators Say We’ve Got Too Much Free Speech; Introduce Bill To Fix That

Why do the elected in the State?s of IL and NY think we have too much Free Speech?

Between arrests for public video taping/picture taking and the people?s representatives that favor muzzling, I certainly hope this is NOT the ?progression? that the organizations they represent favor over Liberty.

spodula (profile) says:

The US constitution

Over in the US, you have a wonderful document, remarkibly clear of legalese that made waves when it was orignially written, and is still an inspiration to people all over the world now.

I Wish my own country (The UK) had such a clear and concise document as opposed to an “Unwritten constitution” which appears to mean “Whatever the ruling class feel like at the time”

So, i’m wondering.
Is the US Constitution not studied in US schools?
This doesnt even seem to pass the laugh test.

Add Your Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here

Comment Options:

Make this the or (get credits or sign in to see balance) what's this?

What's this?

Techdirt community members with Techdirt Credits can spotlight a comment as either the "First Word" or "Last Word" on a particular comment thread. Credits can be purchased at the Techdirt Insider Shop »

Follow Techdirt

Techdirt Daily Newsletter

Techdirt Deals
Techdirt Insider Discord
The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...