If You're Laying Off Your Social Media Expert, You Might Want To Get Those Account Passwords FIRST

from the because-the-situation-hadn't-hit-MAXIMUM-UNCOMFORTIBILITY dept

It's one of those mistakes you only make once. Unfortunately for British entertainment retailer HMV and consulting firm Deloitte, due to the circumstances under which the mistake occurred, once is all they got and once was all it took.

HMV was in the midst of a 190-person layoff (with assistance from Deloitte) when it discovered the company's official Twitter account was still in the hands of a layoffee.

Yesterday HMV, the beleaguered British entertainment retailer, laid off 190 employees, in an effort to cut costs and right its balance sheet. The company apparently pulled a large group into human resources and gave them the bad news. While this was going on, one employee, Poppy Rose, who had been an HMV community manager and thus had access to the corporate Twitter account, started live tweeting about the layoffs.

Over a period of around 20 minutes, she sent out a series of notes expressing her rising sense of alarm to HMV’s 61,500 followers (that number has since risen to 73,350).

Just before the plug was pulled, Poppy Rose gave a shout-out to its HMV's still-employed marketing director, who had noticed altogether too late that someone was live-Tweeting the layoffs. The question, “How do I shut down Twitter?” appears to have been answered by Chinese hackers (or maybe non-Chinese hackers — hedging!), who made off with info from 250,000 accounts in the midst of some rolling blackouts.

A better question would have been: “Before we start laying people off, maybe someone should see who is running our social media accounts and whether or not they appear on the Employee Load Balancing Sheet.” Employees often take to the modern day airwaves of Twitter, Facebook and presumably even Google+ to vent after layoffs, firings, disciplinary actions and random shitty days. Why anyone thought this mass layoff would be different is beyond me.

Most likely, the thought never occurred to anyone on the “culling” side of the equation until the Twitter feed began lighting up with disparaging comments about the current goings-on. HMV, in particular, was primed for this sort of embarrassment, seeing as it obviously felt a social media presence was important (hence the Twitter account), but not important enough to hand out to anyone higher than “intern” on the organizational chart. This is something more employers should be aware of, especially considering company Facebook and Twitter accounts are “standard equipment” in this day and age.

Poppy Rose, whose firing-related tweets added another 12,000 followers to HMV's Twitter account, clearly knows how to use social media. And although the tweets she fired off were far from complimentary, they clearly could have been much, much worse. Despite holding the company's online reputation in her newly-jobless hands, she showed restraint while simultaneously demonstrating how effective these tools can be.

“I wanted to show the power of Social Media to those who refused to be educated,” she tweeted. “Just to set something straight, I did not ‘hijack’ the hmv twitter account. I actually assumed sole responsibility of Twitter & Facebook over two years ago, as an intern. When asked (this afternoon), I gladly provided the password to head office. I also set another member of staff up as a manager on Facebook, and removed myself from the admin list. I didn’t resist any requests to cooperate.”

I'm sure many companies have viewed this story with interest, crossing themselves and saying, “There but for the grace of God go I and several dozen of my former employees, with signed NDAs and less-than-adequate severance packages.” As ugly as a mass layoff is, failing to do a bit of due diligence in terms of your social media accounts leaves the door open for something much uglier. Sure, your former employees may take to the internet to vent about their treatment at your hands, but at least it won't look like it's coming out of your mouth.

Filed Under: ,
Companies: hmv

Rate this comment as insightful
Rate this comment as funny
You have rated this comment as insightful
You have rated this comment as funny
Flag this comment as abusive/trolling/spam
You have flagged this comment
The first word has already been claimed
The last word has already been claimed
Insightful Lightbulb icon Funny Laughing icon Abusive/trolling/spam Flag icon Insightful badge Lightbulb icon Funny badge Laughing icon Comments icon

Comments on “If You're Laying Off Your Social Media Expert, You Might Want To Get Those Account Passwords FIRST”

Subscribe: RSS Leave a comment
ltlw0lf (profile) says:

Re: Re: Re:

more likely the twitter account never crossed their minds

I certainly agree with the later far more than the former. Up until it started hurting their corporate image, they probably didn’t even remember they had one. After all, she said, ?I wanted to show the power of Social Media to those who refused to be educated.? Since this is an entertainment company, I suspect they were blissfully ignorant of the internet (that thing that makes them sad,) and only when someone noticed that bad things were being said, they took action.

What is interesting to me, is that had she kept her mouth shut, she could have walked away with the account, with nobody the wiser, and then hit them harder after security had showed her the door. Then they would have had to hire a lawyer and fight in court to get the account back. Not something I’d do (I’d probably have done the same thing she did, especially since future employers are watching,) but it could have hurt them a lot more than it did.

anonymouse says:

Re: Re: Re:2 Re:

I wonder what the secrets are that these people hold that the NDA is for, I would think that with the knowledge that so many people are leaving at the same time it would be easy enough to create an anonymous account and release all the nasty little secrets they want to hide.
Yes I know that is petty and not the done thing but when your business has been possibly doing illegal things they should be outed. And there are many free anonymous email sites that would works well from an internet cafe.(hint hint)

Anonymous Coward says:

Re: Re: Re:3 Re:

Information like anything else also has fingerprints, if only you knew about something or a version of some fact and others know that you know only that one, than then can trace it back to you.

This is how you catch version leaks of document in a network you fingerprint each and everyone with a typo, a keyword or something and see which one gets leaked.

DogBreath says:

Re: Re: Re:4 Re:

That’s why you surreptitiously gather different versions of said documents while still working there, so when you get fired you release the version that was given to someone who still has a job after you are unceremoniously fired. Works out very well when it comes time to settle old scores and you no longer have anything left to lose (like your job). Said person(s) will likely be those who were an ass to you, or whos ass you kept from being fired for all those years for all the mistakes they made, blamed you for to upper management, and then you had to correct.

The “Marketing Director” document versions would probably work out very nicely in this case, being as he/she more than likely knew about this a long time ago but didn’t want to “spook the herd” into running out too soon to look for other jobs.

Word of advice for those in Management: If you kick the dog one too many times, don’t be surprised when that same dog turns around and bites you in the ass.

G Thompson (profile) says:

Re: Re: Re: Uh oh.

I’m glad you said “theoretically” since in practice they still probably wouldn’t of since then it would of become a criminal matter and the NDA she signed would of been moot since she could of then told in open court every single thing that led up to the mass retrenchments and how HMV might of been keeping secrets from shareholders and corporate watchdogs. Not to mention the public shaming HMV would of endured during the court case.

laurence says:

Re: Re: Re:2 Uh oh.

G Thompson on Feb 4th, 2013

..has managed to make the same fundamental grammatical error at every possible opportunity in his posting. Is this kind of ignorance, in a native-speaking adult who has presumably passed through the educational system, sufficient to found a claim in negligence against his school or LEA?

“probably wouldn’t of..”
“then it would of …”
“she signed should of ..”
“since she could of ..”
“how HMV might of …”
“shaming HMV would of ..”

btr1701 (profile) says:

Re: Re: Re:3 Uh oh.

..has managed to make the same fundamental grammatical error at every possible opportunity in his posting.

LOL! Usually grammar flames are lame, but sometimes they just have to be said.

So many people blissfully ignorant people these days write ‘could of’ instead of ‘could’ve’ or ‘could have’, I won’t be surprised if they start claiming they’re the ones who are right because the language has ‘morphed’ or ‘evolved’ or some such nonsense.

It’s already happened to the word ‘decimate’ and our own Mike Masnick is a prime offender there. It actually means ‘to reduce by 10%’ (leaving 90% intact), but Mike frequently uses it to mean ‘completely destroy’. But if you point that out, the very fact that so many people use the word incorrectly is provided as evidence that it’s not incorrect to use it that way and the word now has a new meaning.

G Thompson (profile) says:

Re: Re: Re:3 Uh oh.

And this coming from someone who doesn’t even have the wherewithal to capitalise their own moniker claiming to be ‘laurence’


Basically grammar for me whilst commenting in TD – which is normally fast, done on small devices and not for the benefit of pedantic Grammar Nazi’s – means the difference between knowing your shit and knowing you’re shit!

Rekrul says:

I’m sure many companies have viewed this story with interest, crossing themselves and saying, “There but for the grace of God go I and several dozen of my former employees, with signed NDAs and less-than-adequate severance packages.”

You’re assuming that companies actually learn from the mistakes of others. So far I don’t see any evidence to support that assumption.

Anonymous Coward says:

This reminds me of the time I worked for a Company that had a mass layoff. The let go the head mainframe programmer that was the only one that knew how to work one of their major programs. The day after they let him go he got a job working for IBM as a consultant. The employer called him and wanted to hire him back. He told them no thanks he got a job with IBM and if they wanted him back they would have to hire him as a consultant at 3 times his old salary with a 1 year min contract. After about a week of working out the details they brought him back as a consultant at 3 times his original salary for one year and he was more than happy to train his replacement.

Add Your Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here

Comment Options:

Make this the or (get credits or sign in to see balance) what's this?

What's this?

Techdirt community members with Techdirt Credits can spotlight a comment as either the "First Word" or "Last Word" on a particular comment thread. Credits can be purchased at the Techdirt Insider Shop »

Follow Techdirt

Techdirt Daily Newsletter

Techdirt Deals
Techdirt Insider Discord
The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...