Philippine Government Ignores Public Concerns, Continues To Push Extreme 'Cybercrime' Law

from the not-listening dept

One of the striking — and depressing — features of the Internet today is the almost universal desire of governments around the world to rein it in through new laws. We wrote about one such attempt in the Philippines a couple of months ago, where the government is trying to bring in some particularly wide-ranging and troubling legislation. Although the Philippine Supreme Court put a temporary restraining order on the law, the Philippine government is not softening its stance, and has asked the court to lift the order. Its arguments are pretty worrying:

“there is always a presumption of validity that attaches to every legislative act”

Oh, really?

It also said the law only “regulates and penalizes” acts defined as cybercrimes like hacking, and does not prevent the petitioners from using the Internet and expressing their thoughts.

Well, that rather depends on how you define cybercrimes, of course.

The government said “traffic data” referred to in the Cybercrime Law is “non-content data” that consists of the origin, destination, route, time and date of the communication. It said that unlike content data, which is considered private, traffic data is an “auxiliary to the communication and is necessarily shared with a service provider who is a third party.”

That is exactly the same erroneous argument used by the UK government to justify its Snooper’s Charter. The problem is that some traffic data — like destination Web addresses — give considerable information about the content being viewed. For example, if people are visiting Web sites that are critical of the Philippine government, it’s pretty clear what they are reading about.

The GMA News piece quoted above lists many other dubious arguments given by the Philippine government in favor of lifting the ban. Ironically, the way it dismisses or ignores the important issues raised by petitioners to the Supreme Court only serves to confirm the impression that the government is not really interested in achieving a fair and balanced solution here, but intends to push through its plans regardless.

Follow me @glynmoody on Twitter or, and on Google+

Filed Under: ,

Rate this comment as insightful
Rate this comment as funny
You have rated this comment as insightful
You have rated this comment as funny
Flag this comment as abusive/trolling/spam
You have flagged this comment
The first word has already been claimed
The last word has already been claimed
Insightful Lightbulb icon Funny Laughing icon Abusive/trolling/spam Flag icon Insightful badge Lightbulb icon Funny badge Laughing icon Comments icon

Comments on “Philippine Government Ignores Public Concerns, Continues To Push Extreme 'Cybercrime' Law”

Subscribe: RSS Leave a comment
Jay (profile) says:

Why is journalism the first target?

It never fails. Government officials want to hide their own wrong doings so they suppress the people. The first ones targeted are the ones reporting about wrong doing. Once the journalists are gone, then you work to suppress the public.

The very clear message we get is that democracy is destroyed when the public is not informed of the actions of government.

And for what? Are the benefits of suppressing discussion really worth leaving a nation ignorant of their culture and different ideas and arguments that the people want?

Is democracy so evil that we need a government to suppress it?

So disappointed that the public can’t have nice things…

Anonymous Coward says:

Politics has similarities with religion, they are both based on belief systems. Both sets of practitioners have limited tolerance for competing ideas, and so wish to control information and so force other people into their belief system. To any politician with strong political beliefs, democracy is like the reformation was to the catholic church, it reduces their power by providing competing beliefs.
The Internet is a powerful enabler of democracy, and so must be controlled to prevent it destroying the beliefs and powers of current politicians. The more repressive a regime, the more dangerous the Internet is to them, so actions like this should not be surprising. Trying to get the politicians to back off is like trying to convince a pope that calvin was right.

Anonymous Coward says:

just about every government, worldwide, have the same lack of concern for anything or anyone other than what they want to achieve, ie, control of what people can do both on and off the net (the fear being that any and all wrong doings by governments and big businesses can instantly be transmitted to everywhere) and the ability of watching everyone every minute. basically, the peoples right to privacy and freedom is almost back to the days before emancipation.

Anonymous Coward says:


“‘there is always a presumption of validity that attaches to every legislative act’

Oh, really?”

YES, really. Courts are not supposed to substitute their judgements for that of the duly elected lawmakers. Laws should not be overturned by courts unless they are clearly unconstitutional. It worries ME that YOU think this is worrying.

Think of it like the presumption of innocence in a criminal case. The presumption doesn’t mean that criminals can’t be convicted. It just means that the case has to be proven first.

Anonymous Coward says:

John Fenderson

Can you control this “Govt”, Mr. ” if we had to choose between those two Bigs (and I don’t think we do), then I choose Big Government. It’s easier to fix the government (who is us) than major corporations (whose behavior we have little to no say in.)?”??? (Article above is the tip of the iceberg)
Quote reference: John Fenderson “It’s easier to fix the government?”

You are lost in a world of delusion John Fenderson…only GOVT can ISSUE FU laws!!
Not Apple, Not Samsung, Not any Corp on the earth. Only Govts FU what COULD be good.
Only stupid Govt pukes issue Patents that cause harm: Here We Go Again: Apple’s Pinch-To-Zoom Patent Rejected On Re-Exam

List of the “supposed” Good Guys that you say are “easier” to control than Corporations:

The list is endless, filled with moronic GOVT pukes that FU things that don’t need to any interference.

John Fenderson, you are truly lost…do you even read this Blog?? Filled with example after example of BIG GOVT fucking everything up???

EX: LEAKED: White House’s Bogus Talking Points On Why Senate Should Trample The 4th Amendment
Apparently, Congress Isn’t Actually Interested In Requiring

A Warrant For Law Enforcement To Read Your Email

EPIC Sues CIA For Release Of Documents Concerning Domestic Spying It Swears’s Not Doing

European Union’s Data Retention Law Could Breach Citizens’ Fundamental Rights

Senate Finally Holds Weak ‘Debate’ On FISA Amendments Act… But Terrorism!

Classic Function Creep As EU Police May Gain Access To Asylum Seekers Fingerprint Database

DOJ Taking Down Sites For Infringement… While Infringing Content Is Available Via Its Own Network

Senate Rejects Final FISA Amendment, Lets Spying Program Stay Shrouded In Secrecy

John Fenderson is lost in BIG Govt lust?and should be treated as “The Notorious B.I.G. Govt Troll” he is?going ?post?al on me won?t help?you?re spent.

Add Your Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here

Comment Options:

Make this the or (get credits or sign in to see balance) what's this?

What's this?

Techdirt community members with Techdirt Credits can spotlight a comment as either the "First Word" or "Last Word" on a particular comment thread. Credits can be purchased at the Techdirt Insider Shop »

Follow Techdirt

Techdirt Daily Newsletter

Techdirt Deals
Techdirt Insider Discord
The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...