Latest TPP Round Locks Out Public Interest Groups Who Flew To New Zealand; Gives Them 15 Minutes Of Access

from the shameful dept

The various government bodies negotiating the Trans Pacific Partnership (TPP) have been criticized repeatedly for their lack of transparency. In the last few negotiating meetings, they’ve tried to respond to this by arguing that they allowed public interest / civil society groups various ways to meet with and interact with the delegates. For the most part, this interaction was way too limited, but it was something. However, for the latest negotiating round in New Zealand, it appears that these groups have been almost entirely excluded. Representatives from a bunch of groups fighting for the public interest — including EFF, KEI,, Public Citizen and others flew all the way to New Zealand… only to be barred from the premises where the negotiations are being held, save for a brief 15 minute session for each on one day of the 10 day negotiation.

Academics, experts, consumer groups, Internet freedom organizations, libraries, educational institutions, patients and access to medicines groups have flown a long way from around the world to Auckland, New Zealand, to engage with delegates in the 15th round of Trans-Pacific Partnership negotiations.

For the first time, however, we have been locked out of the entire venue, except for a single day out of the 10 days of negotiations. This not only alienates us as members of public interest groups, but also the hundreds of thousands of innovators, educators, patients, students, and Internet users who have sent messages to government representatives expressing their concerns with the TPP. All of us oppose the complete unjustifiable secrecy around the negotiations, but more importantly, the IP provisions that could potentially threaten our rights, and innovation.

These new physical restrictions on us are reflective of the ongoing lack of transparency that has plagued the TPP negotiations from the very beginning.

This is really shameful behavior on the part of the New Zealand hosts.

Filed Under: , , ,
Companies: eff, kei, public citizen

Rate this comment as insightful
Rate this comment as funny
You have rated this comment as insightful
You have rated this comment as funny
Flag this comment as abusive/trolling/spam
You have flagged this comment
The first word has already been claimed
The last word has already been claimed
Insightful Lightbulb icon Funny Laughing icon Abusive/trolling/spam Flag icon Insightful badge Lightbulb icon Funny badge Laughing icon Comments icon

Comments on “Latest TPP Round Locks Out Public Interest Groups Who Flew To New Zealand; Gives Them 15 Minutes Of Access”

Subscribe: RSS Leave a comment
Anonymous Coward says:

Re: Re:

I saw a well-known game company claim that its problematic DRM was supposed to be “transparent to the user”, and perhaps it would’ve been had it not fubar’d their computers.

It was a pretty and devious way to say the customers weren’t supposed to *know* about the DRM…if not for those meddling kids with non-functional disk drives!

This feels like a similar interpretation: transparency = nothing to see here, move along.

Anonymous Coward says:

‘These new physical restrictions on us are reflective of the ongoing lack of transparency that has plagued the TPP negotiations from the very beginning.’

more than anything what this behaviour shows is how afraid the negotiators are of allowing any information out as to what is going on and who is calling the shots! when those that will be affected the most are left out and those that will profit the most are all included and responsible for everything happening in every meeting, it is really frightening. it shows exactly how much power there is in certain areas and the lengths that will be taken to use all of that power against the people.

anon says:

Re: Re:

Just as they wasted a lot of money on SOPA and the real true challenges facing trade were ignored so it will happen with TPP everyone will stand against it and everyone will force it to fail, and all those people involved will have wasted there time and investment in the negotiations, Have they not learnt yet that the people have a voice now and the voice is very angry if ignored. Well like SOPA this will go down in history as a waste of time and money and transparency will be the one thing that is demanded more and more in all negotiations in the future.

I just hope that those that want to resolve real trade problems will in the future bar any Hollywood types any access at all , so they can at least get something done instead of being shot down everywhere.

Zakida Paul says:

If the public are ever to trust an elected representative again, their needs to be much more openness and transparency in all aspects of policy making. The path we are on at the moment leads to mistrust, oppression, dissatisfaction, and ultimately if enough people feel oppressed revolution.

You may think that revolution would never happen but when enough people feel oppressed it is inevitable.

Androgynous Cowherd says:

Jet-Setting Negotiations

Anyone else wondering if the tendency of these big negotiations to not happen in one chosen location, but instead to flit around the globe, is merely the guys with the megabux giving themselves perks in the form of globe-trotting working-vacations or is a calculated, cynical ploy to make it much more difficult for anyone to participate that doesn’t belong to “the 1%”? (Though they’re really more like the 0.001% or so.)

Anonymous Coward says:

Re: Jet-Setting Negotiations

It is afaik the same thing as for science conferences: It is more important to appear attractive to the potential participants, than being a good venue. It probably started out as an I host/you host thing, but it has evolved to a competition of showing off. I am almost certain that the reason for the moving negotiations have nothing to do with a ploy to avoid transparence. For that, the tradition is too old, seeing that public interest is a relatively new phenomenon in these circles (70’s and foreward).

As for the need for this waste of money, I doubt there are any really. The sponsoring on these events are close to bribery in some instances and that is probably the closest we get a true conspiracy on choosing venues.

That Anonymous Coward (profile) says:

“This is really shameful behavior on the part of the New Zealand hosts.”

Like spying on people at the behest of the entertainment cartels?
Hiding that it was being done, and ineptly trying to ignore it?

One would think with how embarrassed they are getting over the Dotcom affair, they might have decide to not cave to the cartels once again.

kenmartin (profile) says:

Re: this is really shameful behaviour on the part of the NZ hosts

Truly appalling and cringe-making. As a NZ citizen, I sure as hell did not vote for our PM’s political party, National. Nor the major oppostion party, Labour. They have a bipartisan approach to the TPPA “negotiations” unfortunately. There is some domestic opposition amongst NZ’s population to TPPA drawbacks, but it is still weak. Growing though, with business interests standing to gain from TPPA signing a joint letter to some grand poohba whatever promoting TPPA. Most of us are more concerned about our All Black rugby team being pounded by the Poms (Englsh) last weekend….

That Anonymous Coward (profile) says:

Re: Re: this is really shameful behaviour on the part of the NZ hosts

I have a random question for you, I know in OZ they are getting bent over by the cartels on prices… is the same true for NZ?
I’m trying to ponder why they insist on pretending its harder to push digital content to the upside down parts of the world when it isn’t.
But then I heard a sound bite on the news that iTunes was expanding into more countries and seems to be charging rates based on the market… like 12 cents in India, and a low enough to compete with piracy price in Russia… wondering if this means things will change for you poor upside down people surrounded by sea monsters.

Anonymous Coward says:

it shows the contempt that those in the TPP negotiations have for everyone representing the ordinary people and the lengths those same people will go to to give the industries concerned what they want. these ‘negotiations’ are nothing short of dictatorial orders that the ordinary people are simply expected to adhere to in order to preserve business models and profit levels of companies that refuse to adapt to the digital age. disgraceful and disgusting behaviour!

Anonymous Coward says:

Reason for secrecy

How can governments and their agencies function if they have to listen to the people they are meant to represent. It is much easier, and much the perks are much better if we work with the very rich, as they have to be treated in the style they are used to, and at government expense. Further if the people found out what we are planning, we they would object strongly and disturb our peace.

The Real Michael says:

These TPP “negotiations” are the rich and the wealthy colluding for another power grab. If what they’re doing isn’t wicked, if it wouldn’t affect the public in a negative way, they would have no reason to hide. The people at the top want to benefit at everyone else’s expense. These people are not public servants; they do not represent us.

When the time is ripe, let’s join together to say no.

Anonymous Coward says:

From The Tough Titty Dept.

Did any of the piracy apologist groups ask whether the sessions were open? Were they invited or did they simply invite themselves to attend. Did they get sandbagged or simply want to make a spectacle of “being denied access”. Seems like another contrived grab at headlines, but at least they get a fun vacation in New Zealand.

silverscarcat says:

Re: From The Tough Titty Dept.

Why do you and your ilk call them piracy apologists when they’re looking to make sure that the copyright apologists don’t screw over the average citizen with details that, when they come out, will be screamed at by the citizens.

Maybe the copyright apologists should remember that the internet doesn’t forget what they did.

Anonymous Coward says:

Re: From The Tough Titty Dept.

As a copyright apologist I assume you will be happy under the totalitarian regime required to protect copyright. This means all your devices validate all actions with the copyright holders so thay can block copying of their works, and creation of any derivative works.

Add Your Comment

Your email address will not be published.

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here

Comment Options:

Make this the or (get credits or sign in to see balance) what's this?

What's this?

Techdirt community members with Techdirt Credits can spotlight a comment as either the "First Word" or "Last Word" on a particular comment thread. Credits can be purchased at the Techdirt Insider Shop »

Follow Techdirt

Techdirt Daily Newsletter

Techdirt Deals
Techdirt Insider Discord
The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...