NSA Releases Heavily Redacted Talking Points: Say It's Hard To Watch Public Debate On Its Efforts

from the oh-really? dept

After receiving a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request from Jason Smathers, via Muckrock, the NSA has released a series of “talking points.” What’s incredible is that the talking points themselves are heavily redacted. Considering they’re all about what to tell the press, you have to wonder how they could possibly include anything that should be redacted. It seems that, by definition, the info included in the talking points should be public. The only reason to redact is embarrassment. The snippets you can read are sort of random boosterism about how awesome the NSA is… if only they could tell us.

Amusingly one entire page of the document is redacted… except for one single line reading:

These are sobering findings.


The document also shows that the NSA has written out talking points for members of Congress and the President for when they have to talk about NSA programs. Yes, when you hear a Congressional Rep. defending the NSA, it’s likely based on the following talking points:
In looking around to see who has actually made these claims, it turns out that the NSA actually released these publicly back in 2006, and they were even entered into the Congressional record at the time. Either way, it’s an odd little glimpse into the NSA’s world.

Filed Under: ,

Rate this comment as insightful
Rate this comment as funny
You have rated this comment as insightful
You have rated this comment as funny
Flag this comment as abusive/trolling/spam
You have flagged this comment
The first word has already been claimed
The last word has already been claimed
Insightful Lightbulb icon Funny Laughing icon Abusive/trolling/spam Flag icon Insightful badge Lightbulb icon Funny badge Laughing icon Comments icon

Comments on “NSA Releases Heavily Redacted Talking Points: Say It's Hard To Watch Public Debate On Its Efforts”

Subscribe: RSS Leave a comment
nospacesorspecialcharacters (profile) says:

My own contribution...


In the past year I’ve done some incredibly wild and brave things that have not only kept you safe, but saved you money as well.

It would be irresponsible of me to give you the details, because it might give the trolls that comment here an advantage.

However, you owe me a great debt of gratitude, and also, I think, a financial reward for ensuring your continued freedom. I don’t think it’s asking too much considering all I’ve done.

out_of_the_blue says:

"The terrorist threat to this country is real."

That’s far as you need to read. When gov’t has to remind its highest minions of what should be on top level of the mind, the rest is just more lies.

Support Mike “Streisand Effect” Masnick’s proprietary interest!
He innovated the term all by himself! He alone! It’s HIS!

Loki says:

Re: Re: "The terrorist threat to this country is real."

Because he is a simpleton. If he thinks one simple line is as far as anyone reading needs to go he deserves to be flagged.

It’s not just the words used, but the context under which they were used, and when you look at the statement he’s quoting:

“The terrorism threat to this country is real. We need to do everything possible to make our nation safe, and we need to do it in a way that protects our civil liberties.”

However, when you look at the rest of the text, and the mindset that accompanies it, that statement could very easily be revised to read:

“Remember people, according to the way we view the world, the people who started the American Revolution would be branded traitors and terrorist by our definition. therefor, we need to do everything possible to keep the American people placated and passive, and to do so in such a way that preserves the status quo as much as possible without serious disruption to those in legislative or corporate power.”

Now whether that’s what they really mean or not, without clearly being being able to mindread, is entirely debatable, but also a distinct possibility. The fact that someone is simple willing to read “OMG Terrorism” and mutely/blindly accept whatever talking points may follow, without thinking about the intentions or consequences of said actions, is deserving of being flagged in my opinion.

Anonymous Coward says:

So You Can't Read the Script, Obviously

Obviously, they had to censor the talking points so we wouldn’t be able to tell when (person X) was reading from the script instead of actually describing a logically reached conclusion. I’d bet that >90% of all opinions in sound-bytes related to the NSA come from those documents, instead of actual opinions.

Anonymous Coward says:

Runs On The Board

Real security is finding the bad guys, then catching or killing them. Security theatre is the endless harassment of ordinary citizens over trivia.

If there was real security going on, then there would be bad guys, either in custody or dead, in the USA. The activities of said bad guys would be available for public inspection. That has not happened, therefore the NSA has no runs on the board, in the USA.

There are certainly dead guys in foreign countries (Afghanistan, Pakistan, etc.). The real question is: were they bad? Were they plotting to harm the innocent USA or were they just trying to get the USA out of their own countries? That question is unresolved, so the NSA cannot reliably claim any runs on the board in foreign countries, either.

Therefore the NSA has no runs on the board, worldwide. Therefore they produce no benefit. Meanwhile, their cost is enormous. Therefore, their cost greatly exceeds their benefit. Therefore, stop funding them. You Americans do know that you have a federal deficit problem, don’t you?

Anonymous Coward says:

“[redacted] so the NSA agents aren’t exposed as the foolish [redacted]holes that they are.” Way to hide behind the ‘National Security’ blanket, NSA. You should have no problem releasing these documents, because the NSA has nothing to hide, right? Apparently, the NSA has a lot to hide from, not only from the American People who pay their paychecks, but from the rest of the world as well. I don’t feel safe or secure.

Add Your Comment

Your email address will not be published.

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here

Comment Options:

Make this the or (get credits or sign in to see balance) what's this?

What's this?

Techdirt community members with Techdirt Credits can spotlight a comment as either the "First Word" or "Last Word" on a particular comment thread. Credits can be purchased at the Techdirt Insider Shop »

Follow Techdirt

Techdirt Daily Newsletter

Techdirt Deals
Techdirt Insider Discord
The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...