Marc Randazza Goes To War Against Revenge Porn Site Over Alleged 'Takedown Lawyer' Business Model

from the got-it-all? dept

Well, well. Last year, there was a lot of attention paid to a so-called “revenge porn” site called “Is Anyone Up”? The site reposted submitted nude photos, linked to the person in the photo’s social networking accounts. The “idea” (a horrific one) was that spurned people, who had naked photos of their ex’s, could publicize them. Not surprisingly, many people were completely horrified by the concept and the media coverage was not kind. The site eventually went down, but others popped up to take their place. Lawyer Marc Randazza has decided to go to war with one of them, which uses the very similar name “Is Anybody Down” (and, no, I’m not linking to it). Randazza points out that he has no problem with porn or porn sites, but when the participants are not consenting (and not necessarily adults) he has serious problems.

However, his main issue with this other site is in what he believes to be its sneaky business model. There is apparently an “advertisement” on the site for a “lawyer” named David Blade, who will help you get your photos off the site for $250. Randazza argues that it’s really the site’s own business model:

Here’s their business plan:

Step one: Register the domain name “isanybodydown.com”

Step two: Get ahold of nude photos of people who never consented to having their photos published.

Step three:Publish them, along with their names, home towns, and links to their facebook profiles.

So now how do you “profit?”

Well, openly saying “I’ll take down the photo for $250,” would probably create some legal issues for you. So, instead, you create a fake lawyer persona and say “I am an internet lawyer, named David Blade, III, and I’ll get your pics down for $250.”

The “ad” goes on at length about how successful “David Blade” is in removing images from the site, and how it’s much cheaper than going to any other lawyer. Blade has his own website, called TakedownLawyer.com. Randazza has a few damning facts. The registration info for both sites… are by the same person. The “ad” by “Blade” insists that they’re different people, with Blade claiming to merely be a college friend of the operator of the site — and someone who disapproves of the site. “Blade” claims that as he’s tried to convince the operator of the site to take it down, their “compromise” is that the site owner has allowed him to place that “ad” that just so happens to help “Blade” make money any time someone wants their images down from the site. The other bit of damning evidence? There is no record of a David Blade as a registered NY attorney (where he claims to operate). Oops.

In an email discussion (pdf) with “Blade,” he insists that he really is a lawyer, but that Blade isn’t his real name. That, too, is a big issue, since lawyer advertising is pretty heavily regulated, and one of the common requirements is having your real name and contact info. Randazza points to the NY law to that effect, and “Blade” (still using that name despite admitting it’s not real), insists there’s no violation since he’s not engaging in “case law, civil law or trial law,” but merely doing “mitigated/mediated takedowns, which are not considered to be a legal service.”

Of course, soon after this exchange, the website for “Takedown Lawyer” announced: “Due to ethical concerns our business and the website will now be called ‘Takedown Hammer’.” Uh huh.

Meanwhile, the operator of the “Is Anybody Down” site sent Randazza a profanity laden email asking “why the fuck are you messing with me and Dave?” And it gets worse from there, resorting to ethnic slurs and much, much more. Of course, one could read that email to suggest that the site and “Dave” are, in fact, partners.

There are other little tidbits in this mess, including the fact that the Is Anybody Down site has a blog post asking for investors:

A. Investors, Funding, Etc.

We need more funding (i.e. seed money and/or potential Stage 1 funding) in order to upgrade our server and make T-shirts. Please click the “submit” button to contact an admin if you wish to invest, donate, etc. We are looking for investors, venture capitalists, angel groups, etc.

The seed money will be used for equipment/hardware (computers and server costs), software to be used in the production of the website and the manufacturing of T-shirts which will be sold for value.

Our goal is to raise $50,000+ in seed money to help expand this website, followed by a round one investment prior to an IPO which will return upwards of 600%

There are, of course, a whole bunch of other legal issues brought up by the site, but the statement above? Yeah, that’s a pretty blatant violation of securities law. Publicly advertising for investors is already a no-no, but then also promising an IPO (I’m trying not to laugh) and a return of “upwards of 600%” go way beyond what you’re allowed to say.

Oh yeah, and “Blade” eventually claims that he’s going to hit back at Randazza for “extortion,” which is interesting since Randazza didn’t ask Blade to give him any money (though he does ask him to return the money from those who have paid up to remove their images).

All in all, this certainly feels like yet another one of these “only on the internet” stories where it may be time to get out the popcorn and wait to see what happens next.

Filed Under: , , ,

Rate this comment as insightful
Rate this comment as funny
You have rated this comment as insightful
You have rated this comment as funny
Flag this comment as abusive/trolling/spam
You have flagged this comment
The first word has already been claimed
The last word has already been claimed
Insightful Lightbulb icon Funny Laughing icon Abusive/trolling/spam Flag icon Insightful badge Lightbulb icon Funny badge Laughing icon Comments icon

Comments on “Marc Randazza Goes To War Against Revenge Porn Site Over Alleged 'Takedown Lawyer' Business Model”

Subscribe: RSS Leave a comment
55 Comments
Shadow Dragon (profile) says:

I can recall a few years taking one of my ex’s photos.One of my online friends messed it up to make me feel better.I was kinda surprises that it took him a year later to find out about all the stuff I was trashing him about, even I moved on. He was just jealous fuck that would sabotage my new relationship at that time. Long story short,He should gotten me when he had chance,He shouldn’t kept me waiting too long but I was too nice to dump him but ended the one being damped instead. Moral of the story is your exes will find out eventually what you been saying about them doing with their photos and stuff.

harbingerofdoom (profile) says:

Re: Re: Here's a nifty idea

not exactly but i see where your concern on that is.
i think a more tactful way to have put it is this:

in this day & age, if you are not willing to have your nude self plastered all over the internet, you really should think twice about who you are sending those pics to/who you are letting take such pics of you. how much do you trust that person to not let them out? chances are, they are going to be seen by someone that you dont want seeing them.

Rekrul says:

Re: Re: Here's a nifty idea

Yeah, don’t blame the victim!

It’s like the other night when I went walking through the slums of New York with $5,000 cash in a bag while singing “I’m in the money!” at the top of my lungs, and I actually got mugged!

What is this world coming to when people have to refrain from doing perfectly legal things just because some others might take advantage of them?

That One Guy (profile) says:

Re: Re: Here's a nifty idea

Hmm, actually, reading TAC’s comment down below, it looks like we’re both half right, and it’s probably a mix of pictures taken of them by said ex’s, and by them and sent to said ex’s.

The idea is still incredibly slimy and offensive to be sure, but it seems it’s largely made possible by a pretty massive dose of lousy judgement on the parts of almost all involved.

The Infamous Joe (profile) says:

?

Well, openly saying ?I?ll take down the photo for $250,? would probably create some legal issues for you.

Probably? How could it possibly cause a legal issue? “Sure, we’ll take down that picture, it will simply cost a $250 processing fee.”

Not that I condone this, but it seems like they went out of their way to make this sketchy, a legal sense.

That Anonymous Coward (profile) says:

?

well considering the idiot behind the website used to sell cam shows of himself on myspace, they aren’t to bright.
I am sure his father Retired Master Chief Sargent, United States Air Force would be pleased to know whats being done out of his basement.

The truly sad thing is this moron was actually Doxxed by Anon months ago… and he persists.

That Anonymous Coward (profile) says:

Re: Re:

The problem is and was that they willingly gave those pictures to others.

While it is skeevy when it was happening on the original site, the legal challenges were always getting slapped away because these people gave the pictures to others who then put them on the website.

The cries of many of the female “victims” was they had their pictures “stolen” but no evidence of hacking and it was they sent them to someone they shouldn’t have trusted. It just helped them defend their honor to claim they were stolen or hacked… but the point is they took nudes of themselves and not just to keep as memories.

The guy who ran the first site doing this only folded because it stopped being fun for him, but he was more ethical than the idiot running this new version of it… and that bar wasn’t that high.

The genius behind this site most likely hasn’t verified the ages of any of his victims and well CP charges go over poorly.

Joshua Bardwell (profile) says:

Re: Re: Re:

The genius behind this site most likely hasn’t verified the ages of any of his victims and well CP charges go over poorly.

Even if the victims happen to be over 18, I have known people who worked in porn before, and the recordkeeping requirements with regard to age verification/documentation are incredibly strict. I’m not an expert on the topic, so there may be some legal loophole this person is sneaking through, but my guess would be that he’s definitely breaking the law.

Anonymous Coward says:

on one level – these are just links to photos and social accounts. and links are not illegal.

but-then there is the copyright/DMCA. Are they complying with the Safe-Harbor restrictions regarding photos? If they can block birds from singing on youtube – then surely someone can file a complaint to get these people offline without the money. And then these sites are sued out.

just like mega-upload.

sophisticatedjanedoe says:

Deja vu all over again

Paraphrasing a bit:

Well,openly saying “I’ll tell all family, neighbors neighbors and friends that you have downloaded gay pornography, but I can make this go away if you pay me $3000,” would probably create some legal issues for you if you don’t have a lawyer degree. So, instead, you hire a lawyer persona and now you can call extortion “ADR” and ransom ? “settlement.”

Sounds familiar?

It is always fun to watch one extortionist goes after another.

Guy says:

” Randazza points out that he has no problem with porn or porn sites, but when the participants are not consenting (and not necessarily adults) he has serious problems. “

If you don’t want your picture online then don’t take and distribute those pictures to anyone. After you take them they are not private anymore so don’t complain. If someone uploads a picture that was taken without consent then that is the uploaders fault for breaking the law, not the sites. You can’t keep information a secret once it is made don’t know why everyone keeps trying.

The Infamous Joe (profile) says:

Re: Re: Re:

You seem to be under the impression that you can’t blame the victim. If someone does something foolish and it comes back to bite them, then they deserve to be called out on their foolishness.

Simply put, if you don’t want nude pictures of yourself to be put on the Internet, don’t take nude pictures of yourself. Otherwise, you’re taking a gamble.

The dude says:

To all the white knights out there, telling people not to be stupid and expecting them to know that uploading things to the Internet that they don’t want to be seen is not blaming the victim, its merely trying to educate them about things they should know the very moment they set their foot on the outside world.
This days telling the people that they are being stupid and should change their habits in certain things to avoid trouble is seen more and more as “blaming the poor poor victim”.

Storkleman says:

I wonder how this compares to those newspapers that I see around the country. They post mugshots and information about people arrested for drug offenses and small crimes. In the paper is a # you can call to have the images removed for a processing fee. I doubt their business model is illegal.

I would imagine this case would hinge on details such as consent, the advertising as a lawyer, an attempt to deceive by pretending to not be affiliated and other attempts to deceive.

That Anonymous Coward says:

Moderation...

did we have fear I was going to do something wrong?
Are you new?
Did you really fear I would post the dox here?
I’d really like to understand the motivation.

Many things I’d like to be commenting on now, but there now seems to be no point. My comments just disappearing into the ether.

Might I request the courtesy of an email when this block is lifted and I can once again be trusted to participate as a grownup?

I am disappoint in you.

?? says:

Yes ppl should be more careful of who they send their pictures to or be more careful of keeping the content private, but im sure the subjects of the pictures have suffered enough for their mistakes they shouldn’t have to live with it for the rest of their lives because in sure they have learned to be more Careful. Also…. If u thinks these girls are dumb for sending these pictures to boys.. think again because not every single girl on that website sent their pictures to someone

sophisticatedjanedoe says:

Re: Re:

This. I don’t understand why regular folks are so cruel and bloodthirsty. Zero tolerance implies zero mercy and zero empathy.

Everyone of us made many stupid things: before saying “it’s nobody’s fault but yours,” everyone should make an effort and recall own bloopers, and imagine the worst possible consequences.

IsAnybodyDown (user link) says:

Cease And Desist

Be advised that these actions, your slander and screen shots can and will be used as key factors should a case be pursued against you. Your posting, advertising, marketing, dissipating and otherwise disseminating the slanderous materials constitute actionable violations of Mr. Trahan and Mr. Brittain’s rights of privacy and publicity.

Leave a Reply to The Infamous Joe Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here

Comment Options:

Make this the or (get credits or sign in to see balance) what's this?

What's this?

Techdirt community members with Techdirt Credits can spotlight a comment as either the "First Word" or "Last Word" on a particular comment thread. Credits can be purchased at the Techdirt Insider Shop »

Follow Techdirt

Techdirt Daily Newsletter

Ctrl-Alt-Speech

A weekly news podcast from
Mike Masnick & Ben Whitelaw

Subscribe now to Ctrl-Alt-Speech »
Techdirt Deals
Techdirt Insider Discord
The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...
Loading...