Lamar Smith's Head-In-Sand Approach To SOPA Critics Inspires 'Lamar Smith Can't Hear You' Anti-Campaign Poster
from the speak-up-please dept
This is pretty awesome. Last week, Lamar Smith (once again) tried to dismiss any opposition to SOPA, by insisting that it was a tiny “vocal minority” who was peaking up, and insisting that “not one of the critics was able to point to any language in the bill that would in any way harm the internet.” Except… that’s not true. Tons of people have pointed out language that was problematic. Furthermore, spitting on and lying about the widespread internet community, just as it’s trying to make a difference, isn’t that smart. Via BoingBoing, we learn that this is just leading to further backlash, such as ChadRocco creating a brilliant “anti-campaign” poster against Lamar Smith: Lamar Smith Can’t Hear You:
Meet Lamar Smith, representative from Texas, and Chairman of the House Committee on the Judiciary.
As Chairman he can kill any bill he doesn’t like by denying it a hearing while giving priority to the bills he wants to pass, Like SOPA.
While addressing the massive outcry over SOPA he stated that:
?It?s a vocal minority. Because they?re strident doesn?t mean they?re either legitimate or large in number. One, they need to read the language. Show me the language. There?s nothing they can point to that does what they say it does do. I think their fears are unfounded.?
Above is a list of people that have pointed at the language, including law professors and computer experts.
You have a civil war among video game companies, and the successful boycott of a company. How do you ignore that?
It’s an election year. This November. Whatever happens, Texas, please kick this guy out of office.
If anything, I’d say that the graphic significantly underplays the opposition. The massive list of those opposed to SOPA is growing daily and has a lot more impressive folks than are just in that graphic (also, as far as I know, Microsoft has not publicly opposed SOPA — though it was rumored to have done so quietly to get the BSA to back off). Still, the graphic really is emblematic of the stance that Smith has taken on SOPA. As long as he ignores the loud, widespread and growing opposition, perhaps he thinks it will just go away.
Filed Under: anti-campaign, lamar smith, pipa, poster, protect ip, sopa
Comments on “Lamar Smith's Head-In-Sand Approach To SOPA Critics Inspires 'Lamar Smith Can't Hear You' Anti-Campaign Poster”
photo forgot 1 group
The photo forgot about half of the people who are major supporters on the bill who backed down. So maybe it should also add 2 groups to the list for:
democrats
republicans
and the opposing poster can say “Time Warner … VOTE FOR SOPA!!!!”. Lets see how far that gets them …
(Thanks to high cable prices and a whole lot of commercials, many people probably have enough disrespect for companies like Time Warner to oppose SOPA on the basis that they support it).
Re: Re:
I just got netflix on my Wii and I have to say I’m considering just cancelling the cable now. I can’t remember the last time I bothered to watch it…
… oh wait, it was last spring when the storm sirens went off and I wanted to make sure I wasn’t about to be blown to the magical land of Oz.
So yeah… a tiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiny bit obsolite there Time Warner.
Re: Re: Re:
Welcome to the world of cord cutting. I haven’t watched Cable or Satellite television since I lived at my mom’s house and have never missed it. Every time I go there or to my in-laws, I am reminded just why exactly I don’t.
For example, I was at my in-laws over the Christmas holiday and I sat down to watch some tv. After flipping through the channels for the 3rd time looking for something, I switched over to Netflix and was watching something 1 minute later. Instant gratification beats spoon-fed crap any day.
Re: Re: Re: No spoon
I guess some people just prefer the spoons…
Re: Re: Re:2 No spoon
This is no joke, actually. I went to pay my rent this month, and the landlord is like 63 years old.
He was sitting at home in front of his 50″ flat screen with Fox News on. He starts ranting on about a lady he took out to dinner that spent the whole night looking at her phone each time it vibrated.
He said “This younger generation with all their gadgets, and computers; I just don’t understand it. I can’t believe anything that is said out there on that thing you call the Internet. I like the good old standby’s like Fox News for example. They tell it like it is. It’s real.”
I’m pretty sure the look on my face equated “Facepalm”.
He was smart enough to take one look at me and say, “Well, I guess there always comes a point in time where there is a generation gap.”.
I just smiled at him.
Re: Re: Re:3 No spoon
Yes and no. I consider that dinner companion to be rude.
But maybe I’m just too old to appreciate a date who spends all her time paying attention to everything except me. Maybe it is a generational thing.
Contrariwise, I don’t have cable, don’t watch broadcast, consider Fox to be an unreliable news source, and I own a smartphone and multiple computers.
Re: Re: Re:4 No spoon
Where as I do agree that people pay attention to their devices at times that is easily considered rude their is a lot of other rude things they could be doing that don’t use electricity.
Now if your date starts puts down the phone and starts rearranging the table or talking to somebody else you might take that as a clue that is you.
On the other side of the coin…. I often sit on the couch an cuddle with my wife while we look at our own devices, but we will share and show each other the cool and interesting stuff we find or are doing.
It is all about context and how you interact, not the device, or book or tv show or keg of beer.
Re: Re: Re:5 No spoon
The context appears to be a date. I consider it rude to ignore your date. You appear to be shifting the blame; fine, my hypothetical date is ignoring me because I’m a screaming bore. Oddly enough… it’s still rude.
Apparently it’s a generational thing; your generation was obviously raised with very different social values from mine. Good news: I won’t be asking you out on a date anytime soon.
P.S. It works both ways. It would be just as rude for me to ignore my date. I’m not trying to claim it’s all on her. Contrariwise, if I found that I couldn’t stand her, I’d try to remain polite and simply end the date as early as I could.
Re: Re: Re: Re:
just make sure you don’t cord cut merely to create another (google tv, apple tv, tivo, roku).
All of the above products can be replaced merely by actually using a computer (as it is already capable of doing), and all of the above support drastic DRM/give you far less control over everything, for about 1/5th the cost of the above products.
Re: Re: Re: Re:
Agreed. I laugh every time I go over to a friend’s house and flip through 400 channels only to find there’s nothing worth watching. If I was paying 50-100 bucks a month for that, I’d be a very bitter person!
Re: Re: Re: Re:
Meanwhile, those of us in many other countries are still not allowed to access those services legally (yes, I know I can VPN but that’s not the same as being able to access the services normally).
I’m in a country that the US has recently been attacking, and whose services (which have been deemed legal in this country) bills like SOPA are being created to block. Said services being set up as a direct response to said material not being available legally.
Why, it’s almost as if servicing the market would take care of the problem without needing censorship laws…
Re: Re: Re:
I’m fortunate enough to have ESPN3 through my ISP so I can even watch some sports live. For those that have exclusive contracts [cough]NFL[/cough] I can always stream from Australia or the UK.
Re: Re: Re:
It’s telling that if SOPA supporters (like Time Warner, the MPAA, the RIAA) put their names on pro-sopa political ads it would do a disservice for their cause. They would have to find another way to position the ad without their names on it.
When SOPA opponents put their names on ads critical of the bill, it’s likely to garnish even more support of the political ad and more opposition to the bill than had they not.
Tells you something about the companies supporting these bills and the public’s perception of them vs the companies opposing them and the public’s perception of them.
Re: Re: Re: Re:
(and that’s because, given the high prices of cable and the number of commercials, people take for granted that any bill Time Warner et al support is just another attempt for them to offer you higher prices with more commercials).
Voters response to Lamar Smith, “What’s that? Can’t hear why I should vote for you, so I’ll vote against you!”.
Top money
I’d add “… from the top of the pile of money the entertainment industry gave me!” after the “I can’t hear you!” part. That’s why I’m not in the marketing business, it would have ruined the visuals =/
Re: Top money
I would of went with Capitalist Lion Tamer’s idea and have the poster show that his ears are stuffed with money in addition with his fingers…
Re: Re: Top money
Shit. And they say a picture is worth a thousand words! Indeed that would be epic.
It’s going to take more than a couple of fingers to dig all that lobbying money out of his ears.
(Should probably use someone else’s fingers as well. I would think Lamar’s fingers would do a less-than-thorough job.)
Re: Re:
5/8″ auger bit should work well.
Really helpful for getting in there and moving material out of the hole. We should always use well designed tools when possible.
Re: Re: Re:
Ya, but you’d still need a decent size pressure washer and an acid etch to mine all the cemented in styrofoam out from between his ears.
It’s not the sand that his head is stuck in …
Re: Re:
err.. yep, pretty much
This is stupid.
Lamar Smith did indeed listen, as the manager’s amendment so obviously shows.
You just love piracy, Masnick. When are you going to come out and admit it?
Re: Re:
Smith says there’s only a small vocal minority. Says no-one has pointed to any controversial language in the bill.
The poster encapsulates the fact that he is lying. There is a massive outcry over this. If Smith says no-one is talking about the bill, and in fact there is, the only possible reason for his statement is…he is lying.
You just love censorship and falsehoods, Anonymous Coward. When are you going to come out and admit it?
Re: Re:
This is stupid.
I rarely seen a comment open with a description of the comment. It’s almost too self-referential.
Re: Re: Re:
It’s too bad you can’t put your “brilliance” to work doing something other than baby sitting.
Maybe you can write something definitive about emasculation some time.
Re: Re: Re: Re:
Maybe you can write something definitive about emasculation some time.
Just send me whatever you’ve compiled to this point and I’ll “punch it up.”
Re: Re: Re: Re:
But you already have, and we wouldn’t want anything derivative, now would we?
Re: Re:
Translation:
“I can’t hear you!”
Re: Re:
Why do you go on about pirates and piracy? The article never mentioned them at all.
Re: Re: Re:
Desperation.
Re: Re:
If he did listen, and aforementioned people can still find problems with it, what listening he did do (if at all) was a poor job.
But I’m not surprised you’re not pointing this out. You’re in the camp who thinks that whatever the artist does, even poorly, the label should be paid.
You just love piracy, Masnick. When are you going to come out and admit it?
If he does or doesn’t is totally irrelevant to SOPA. SOPA will suck even for content owners – they are just too over zealous to get *something* (anything) passed.
Haste on this will prove it will be nothing but a waste.
if Lamar Smith gets voted out of office at the next elections, do you think he will hear the ‘get the fuck out’ or do you think he’ll carry on pretending that ‘it was a tiny “vocal minority” who was speaking up’ against him?
answers to the ‘Chairman of the House Committee on the Judiciary’ only, please!
Re: Re:
See also: Bob Bennett
He never saw it coming either.
Sympathy for the devilish
Oh, come on. Look at the position Lamar’s in. Granted, he put himself there, but what choice does he have now? It’s not like he can give back the money. He was purchased fair and square. It probably went down something like this:
LOBBYISTS: Lamar, I’m sure you’re concerned with stuff like America, jobs and stealing.
LAMAR SMITH: Of course. I’m here to serve my constituents and nothing would make them happier than America, jobs and… whoa… is that real?
LOBBYISTS (LB): Oh, this? Yeah, it’s real. It’s what we in the business call “a shit-ton of Benjamins.” You can touch it.
LAMAR SMITH (LS): Nice. Wow. I don’t I’ve ever seen this many, um, “Benjamins” in one place. I feel like Rick Ross. You know, “Ever seen a million cash, gotta count it carefully…” I think I’m going to count it! Let me get my lounge pants!
LB: Lamar. That’s really not necessary…
[10 minutes later]
LB: Anyway, Lamar, we’ve got a proposition for you.
LS: 250,300… 250,400… wha?
LB: Are you familiar with The Internet?
LS: A little. I get my email on it. Sometimes I watch some youtubes.
LB: Well, The Internet is great… in theory. The problem is that The Internet is never used for great things. Take a look at this.
[Plays presentation entitled “The Internet: Always On, Always Wrong.” Footage includes shots of Kim Dotcom driving a sports car while humming a copyrighted tune, a few Youtube comment threads, Eileen Siedler issuing DMCAs, Eileen Siedler issuing more DMCAs, some brief sapphic eroticism, /b/, someone being bullied on Facebook, the ultra-sad face of a creative ladder operator, pages full of DVD covers and foreign text, a LOLCAT and Terry Hart marking his own comment as “Insightful”.]
LS: [absently thumbing stack of $100s] I see. Well, nothing more needs to said or viewed, especially /b/. You can count on my tireless support of this legislation, which you have yet to detail for me but I’m sure that [waves in the general direction of the money] I’ve got the gist of it. Jobs, foreigners, America, right?
LB: That’s pretty much it. We’ll be needing to break The Internet to pull it off, but as you can see, it clearly offers nothing but theft, misspellings and tentacle porn. And don’t worry about your email. We can always build you an intranet, which is much like The Internet, only it locks from the outside.
LS: Swell! I do like to get my email!
LB: There will be tons of opposition to this but don’t let it dissuade you. Remember, the opponents are nothing but a bunch of thieves who can’t spell, hate America, live in their mom’s basement and violate themselves while watching anime.
LS: Those… those bastards! Sorry. I normally don’t swear but the money and the tentacle porn and the Rick Ross thing sort of took over.
LB: Alright. We can count on you?
LS: What opposition?
LB: [LAUGHS EVILLY, POINTS TO NOSE]
LS: [LAUGHS EVILLY, SCREWS UP AND POINTS TO LOBBYIST’S NOSE]
Rubbing my crystal ball (plural), I foreshadow the doom and gloom of SOPA passing into law and the first target of these rogue sites will be…
…anyone posting this image, since it’s clearly transformative works of a copyrighted work.
To ignore such numerous and widespread protestations as Lamar Smith does is most illogical. However, it is not unusual given that he represents interests whose very goal involves the ignorance of technology and its capabilities, as well as human nature itself. It is a classic case of the blind leading the blind. Both will fall into the ditch, and it will be of their own doing.
Re: Re:
more like tying the rope around their own necks and standing there, they will die eventually but extremely slowly and painfully possibly at the expense of others, someone needs to give them a push to hurry it up
Okay I’m going to try this question one more time, I am against SOPA but when I am asked why is it okay to DNS filter or block for a virus or malware etc… and that doesn’t break the net then how would it break the net if it is done for copyright? I don’t know the answer so if anyone does please let me know.
Re: Re:
From working with Comcast, when they blocks a computer from spam, virus, malware, etc, it is usually by the port that it is broadcasting on and not by DNS. But this is for individual computers and not domains. I haven’t heard of a domain being blocked because of those reasons but I suspect they would do the same thing.
Re: Re: Re:
http://www.opendns.com/internet-security/
“When OpenDNS sees a request for a known malicious site (i.e., irc.badbot.ru), OpenDNS will block the domain from resolving by redirecting the request to a block page and will notify you.”
Re: Re: Re: Re:
The main difference that will be causing the issue is the sites being filtered. The bill makes it far to easy for someone to attack a site they don’t like and get it on a blocked list. OpenDNS offers a filtering service but from what I can tell that is kind of a separate layer on top of their DNS. You can setup an account and choose what you want filtered. It is not actually messing with the core DNS.
Re: Re: Re:
Thanks guys that explains it.
Re: Re:
If I had to guess, I’d say it’s because those virus/malware filters are:
1. Not mandatory, for the people who implement them or for you. (It’s not yet a federal crime to switch DNS servers.)
2. Not defined by politicians who enjoy bragging about how little they understand the technology they regulate.
3. Not blocking anything anyone would ever actually want for any reason ever. (Does a spam filter deny spam companies’ free speech rights? Answer: Nobody cares about spam companies, so whatever.)
Re: Re:
Ask yourself who or what is doing the blocking for these bad locations.
Ask yourself if you have a real choice about how you are connecting to the Internet.
Ask yourself about who is compiling this list of bad locations.
Ask yourself how this list is compiled, implemented and managed.
Now ask yourself how you could get around these bad site filters to investigate for yourself.
Finally, ask yourself who might claim that a location is infringing on copyright and what the result of that could be under SOPA.
One short answer from me is that all of those bad locations you’re referencing can be gotten to via DNS right now, one way or another, via DNS name resolution. Their DNS presence has not been hijacked.
Re: Re:
From a security stand point, pure and simple if you open a backdoor for legitimate uses it will be used for bad things too so that weakens DNSSEC.
From a trust point of view, if you start blocking anything that is not accepted universally everywhere you are not going to succeed, people don’t go after viruses to get infected, they don’t go out and learn how to bypass anything in great numbers to go view pedo material, but they will create solutions to view other things and that will be used by criminals too. So instead of one route you now have to secure and take care of alternative routes and that is no easy task since nobody knows what they will look like in the future.
Re: Re:
Also the problem with “policy” is that it is arbitrary, someone decides what can and cannot happen, at the moment we have a lot of people who decide on their own they have no pressure to get it right and that is a good thing it keep costs down and make the cost of making mistakes low since the guy in charge can remedy that problem by himself on the other hand by allowing the government to interfere that liberty no longer exists and the price for getting wrong could be your freedom so people will exclude everything they can to be in compliance bad or good indiscriminately, how is that good?
truth
its the Massive minority that WANT this bill, or the other 4 to pass.
Govt control of internet
once again some elite politician thinks he or they know best and want to be able to shutdown the internet at a Government whim .
Back off you government progressives .
Lamar Smith you are a traitor and a bastard.
SOPA/PIPA = WAR
You will not be re-elected and you will go down in Infamy.
He's deaf on purpose
It’s the money coming in through the back door that has made him deaf-millions of dollars in campaign contributions, plus he meets real celebrities!
How can he not be deaf to smart people when he can say he knows some Hollywood big wigs who can line up a hot date for him any time?
It’s better than some Internet dating service, that’s for sure!
The blacklisting provision isn’t all that needs to be dropped. What about the one that bans proxies and vpn services? Nothing is more important than that one, not even the blacklist itself. It would do serious harm to people fighting oppressive regimes, and Lamar Smith doesn’t seem to give a damn about it. If just that one provision was dropped, I wouldn’t have as much of a problem with what he wishes to accomplish.