VeriSign Seeks Greater Power To Help Law Enforcement Around The Globe Censor Websites They Don't Like

from the this-is-a-problem dept

We’ve discussed in the past how VeriSign helped make it easy for ICE to seize domain names that use the .com and .net domain names. And now it looks like the company would like to expand those censorship-helping powers to seize domain names of websites at the request of law enforcement around the globe, even without a trial or any sort of due process. The company claims it gets lots of requests from non-US law enforcement for such things. Of course, the proper response is that VeriSign should tell them to pound sand. Instead it’s seeking broad powers to help governments censor websites. Scary stuff. Even worse, the company seems to be burying this request in a larger request to be able to take down “malicious” sites, such as those that are spewing malware. That makes it more likely that these powers will be granted. Once again, a reminder that when you have a few private intermediaries who act as gatekeepers, it only serves to enable censorship. Seems like it’s time to route around such central gatekeepers.

Filed Under: , , ,
Companies: verisign

Rate this comment as insightful
Rate this comment as funny
You have rated this comment as insightful
You have rated this comment as funny
Flag this comment as abusive/trolling/spam
You have flagged this comment
The first word has already been claimed
The last word has already been claimed
Insightful Lightbulb icon Funny Laughing icon Abusive/trolling/spam Flag icon Insightful badge Lightbulb icon Funny badge Laughing icon Comments icon

Comments on “VeriSign Seeks Greater Power To Help Law Enforcement Around The Globe Censor Websites They Don't Like”

Subscribe: RSS Leave a comment
32 Comments
That Anonymous Coward (profile) says:

*whips out a crystal ball*
Ah hello Verisign… you’ve come to see your future haven’t you…. please sit down…
ommmmm
I see many, masked people visiting you soon.
They will bring into the light all of your misdeeds.
All because you sold out peoples rights.
I see your servers bursting into flames, and your certs ending up revoked.

It might not be the 5th of November… but I bet they might make an exception for you.

Expect them.

out_of_the_blue says:

Let's hope "ICANN's board of directors" decides correctly!

“a Registry Services Evaluation Process (RSEP) document filed today with ICANN. The RSEP is currently the primary mechanism that registries employ when they want to make significant changes to their contracts with ICANN.

But ICANN’s board of directors would have the make the ultimate decision whether to approve the anti-abuse policy and the malware-scanning service.”

Real story here is that we’re now subject to ICANN! Yet another unaccountable /international/ corporation. So tell me, Mike, how do you propose to get rid of ICANN? You CAN’T just “route around” it, silly.

:Lobo Santo (profile) says:

Re: Let's hope "ICANN's board of directors" decides correctly!

Your dermis is showing! I mean, your ignorance is showing!

Seriously, do you even understand how the interwebs work?

I’ll explain it: ICANN owns the patent on naming ‘tube stops’ as well as on maps/directions for navigating the tubes.

But, it’s not like nobody else can make a map, or name a place.

Anyhow, I amazed you managed to navigate the tubes and find this place! Or, are you lost and unable to find your way to anywhere else?

out_of_the_blue says:

Re: Re: Let's hope "ICANN's board of directors" decides correctly!

@ “Lobo Santo”: You’re the master of irrelevant contradiction. Soon as anyone criticizes Mike, you jump in with some random nonsense and vituperation.

You wrote: “ICANN owns the patent on naming ‘tube stops'”

So tell me exactly how to “route around” ICANN. Show me where it’s been done.

Anonymous Coward says:

It seems to me the purpose of this move is to legitimize the recent practice of taking down websites based on nothing more than US government claims of infringement. As such, I suspect the Obama administration is ultimately the one behind this proposal. This claim is supported not only by recent domain seizures but also by numerous other examples of the Obama administration bending over backwards to satisfy the whims of its entertainment industry contributors.

The government’s reasoning must be that as long as it’s a private organization taking down websites it will not itself be held responsible for improper takedowns, nor will it have to justify such takedowns to any judge. As such, this constitutes the greatest threat to freedom the Internet has ever faced.

Anonymous Coward says:

Re: Re:

This claim is supported not only by recent domain seizures but also by numerous other examples of the Obama administration bending over backwards to satisfy the whims of its entertainment industry contributors.

For the sake of accuracy, here are the top ten contributors to Obama through the last election cycle. (through PAC’s, employees, officers and immediate families). Note that tech giants Google and Microsoft are #4 and 5. Only Time Warner is in the top ten and its business interests are far broader than just Warner Bros. (ie TW Cable, etc) Grouped by industry, Computer/Internet gave slightly more than Motion Picture/TV/Music. So in anticipation of the usual cries that decisions are unduly influenced by a larger contributor, I point this out. (all from Opensecrets.org). Note also that higher education are the biggest contributors who generally are more aligned with the computer/internet industry.

University of California $1,648,685
Goldman Sachs $1,013,091
Harvard University $878,164
Microsoft Corp $852,167
Google Inc $814,540
JPMorgan Chase & Co $808,799
Citigroup Inc $736,771
Time Warner $624,618
Sidley Austin LLP $600,298
Stanford University $595,716

Anonymous Coward says:

Re: Re: Re:

Funny how your list excludes the approximately 1.3 million dollars David Geffen raised for him? How many other such contributions have you excluded? Also, how do you explain Obama’s appointments of numerous people friendly to the entertainment industry and hostile to opposing interests?

Anonymous Coward says:

Re: Re: Re: Re:

Funny how your list excludes the approximately 1.3 million dollars David Geffen raised for him? How many other such contributions have you excluded?

I went to Opensecrets.org and cited the source here. You have a citation to offer along with your accusation?

Also, how do you explain Obama’s appointments of numerous people friendly to the entertainment industry and hostile to opposing interests?

You aren’t serios are you? The administration is lousy with Googlers:

http://money.cnn.com/2009/10/21/technology/obama_google.fortune/

http://bits.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/05/29/googles-top-policy-exec-to-join-obama-administration/

http://www.internetevolution.com/author.asp?section_id=851&doc_id=194575

http://biggovernment.com/capitolconfidential/2010/04/27/another-ex-googler-in-obama-administration-buzz-ted-by-google/

Anonymous Coward says:

Re: Re: Re:2 Re:

“I went to Opensecrets.org and cited the source here. You have a citation to offer along with your accusation?”

Yes: http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,253124,00.html

“You aren’t serios are you? The administration is lousy with Googlers”

Yeah. So how do you explain Obama’s appointments of numerous people friendly to the entertainment industry and hostile to opposing interests?

abc gum says:

It’s no surprise that some people do not like the ease of modern day communication amongst the peons and would like to put a stop it. Apparently they realize this would cause much uproar and are attempting the slow and gradual removal of the internet as a communications platform. In its place will be a shiny new and hopelessly useless POS media distribution system much like television.

Needless to say , these people are short sighted.

Add Your Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here

Comment Options:

Make this the or (get credits or sign in to see balance) what's this?

What's this?

Techdirt community members with Techdirt Credits can spotlight a comment as either the "First Word" or "Last Word" on a particular comment thread. Credits can be purchased at the Techdirt Insider Shop »

Follow Techdirt

Techdirt Daily Newsletter

Techdirt Deals
Techdirt Insider Discord
The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...
Loading...