Funniest/Most Insightful Comments Of The Week At Techdirt

from the potluck-comments dept

Some weeks, the most votes for funny and insightful don’t overlap at all… and some weeks, there’s a ton of overlap. This was one of those weeks. The comment that was voted most insightful, by Brent Ashley, also received a bunch of funny votes. It was in response to Senators complaining that Google was too big. Brent felt that perhaps there were some other things that were “too big” that needed attention:

Congress should expand their search for systems that need dismantling or breaking up due to bigness. Take their own two political parties for instance. Not enough competition. If one goes out of business all you’ll have is the other one.

Coming in second, talking about the same topic, was Craig’s comment recalling some other organizations that were declared “too big” by the government but seemed to get very different treatment from the government:

We get hearings on why Google is too dominate but not about the banks that are “too big to fail” and how they dominate the financial system. Where are the trust busters when we need them?

It is a good point. Why was it okay for the banks to get too big to fail?

I’ve got just one editor’s choice comment this week, which just missed making it as a top vote-getter. It’s from an Anonymous Coward, on the post about the US Chamber of Commerce lobbying to break and censor the internet. Someone in the comments was mocking the worries of people about PROTECT IP, saying they didn’t know what they were talking about, to which someone else pointed out that some of the folks who are complaining basically built core internet infrastructure, and this AC took it from there:

Yep, that’s us. We built the greatest distribution platform EVER for the music, movie, publishing, etc. industries. We did it at zero cost to them. We labored in obscurity for decades figuring out how to make it work, often funding our experiments out of our own pockets. We created something beyond their wildest dreams. (Surely, nobody thinks that the myopic dimwits in these legacy industries could have POSSIBLY imagined the Internet, let alone created it. Such work is far beyond their pitifully feeble intellects.)

Anyway, so we made it possible for them to do incredible things…and make a lot of money doing so, by the way. All they had to was adapt, to change, to embrace.

And as it turns out, this is ALSO beyond their pitifully feeble intellects.

So I look forward to their extinction. They’re already obsolete, it just remains to wait for them to die off.

And, as we move over to funny, the top vote getter also got a ton of “insightful” comments, and came very close to entering the winner’s circle on that side as well. It came from “John Doe,” in response to the story about whether or not arresting someone for flashing their lights to warn oncoming drivers of a speed trap represented a free speech violation:

The crime is “Felony Interference with Police Revenue Generation.”

Coming in second was an Anonymous Coward’s comment on someone expressing surprise that nightclubs would have to pay higher licensing fees if the club was deemed an “adult entertainment” club (i.e., one with strippers). The AC explained one theory for the pricing differential:

I speak from experience when I say that bare boobies cost more than covered boobies.

Believe it or not, that one got a ton of “insightful” votes too, though I’m not sure why. Anyway, we’ll close with just one more editor’s choice. This one concerning the guy in the UK who trademarked the government slogan “Keep Calm and Carry On” and then whined about how he should get to keep it because he quit his day job to focus on the trademark. An Anonymous Coward wished he’d gotten some advice:

He quit his day job to become a trademark troll? Someone should’ve told him to “Keep Calm and Carry On” before he did that.

Anyway, keep calm and carry on all of you. We’ll be back tomorrow with more posts.


Rate this comment as insightful
Rate this comment as funny
You have rated this comment as insightful
You have rated this comment as funny
Flag this comment as abusive/trolling/spam
You have flagged this comment
The first word has already been claimed
The last word has already been claimed
Insightful Lightbulb icon Funny Laughing icon Abusive/trolling/spam Flag icon Insightful badge Lightbulb icon Funny badge Laughing icon Comments icon

Comments on “Funniest/Most Insightful Comments Of The Week At Techdirt”

Subscribe: RSS Leave a comment
32 Comments
Anonymous Coward says:

“We get hearings on why Google is too dominate but not about the banks that are “too big to fail” and how they dominate the financial system. Where are the trust busters when we need them? “

http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20110921/14190816043/how-quickly-we-forget-googles-competitors-falsely-claim-google-dominates-because-it-was-first.shtml#c172

I’m going to be a copyright troll and sue for infringement.

http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20110920/17171916034/if-googles-upstart-competitors-arent-afraid-google-why-is-washington-upset.shtml#c230

You copied from my comment!!!! You will be hearing from my lawyers soon 😉

Anonymous Coward says:

Your “Editor’s Choice” commenter commends a feeble comment that takes an article and parses it to support a position that does not accurately reflect the article itself.

Yes, 5 persons associated with internet technology expressed concerns about the DNS filtering aspects of the proposed legislation. Theirs is not, however, a universally accepted view, as others it the field have expressed much more measured views, and some have criticized it as not being anywhere near as significant a problem as these persons positied.

Who is right? Probably a little of both. There are likely some problems, and it is likely that some of the problems are stated in somewhat embellished terms. That is the nature of give and take within the technical community.

What troubles me the most, however, about those who cite the letter prepared by these 5 individuals choose to ignore other aspects of the letter that likewise reflect the views of its authors. For example, they do support the legislation, but it is the portion associated with DNS Filtering that gives them pause. Likewise, the call for international cooperation to address the issues underlying the illegal distribution of rights holder content. Such efforts at international cooperation have been underway for many, many years, and yet each time the subject comes up at sites like this the efforts are derided, and with a vengance. One need only look at comments concerning ACTA, which seem to be little rants directed at “big, bad media, pharma, software, etc.” that are making money hand over fist and that this should be more than enough. Otherwise, they are money grubbers who deserve out collective disdain.

If you want to select a comment for an “Editor’s Choice” award, at least direct it to a comment or series of comments that are intellectually honest, and not the selective reading of passages in an article that presents a distorted picture of the actual article.

Anonymous Coward says:

Re: Re:

“Theirs is not, however, a universally accepted view”

Evidence needed.

Where are the blogs full of IT technocrats that agree with you. LOTS and LOTS of people/TECHS follow blogs like techdirt and Slashdot, and their comments overwhelmingly criticize such filtering measures.

Where are the blogs full of thousands upon thousands of followers in the tech industry (and by technocrats, I do not mean lawyers), blogs with authors and posts and discussions that hold your position? Blogs with people who are educated either in tech or engineering or physics and hold relevant degrees from various universities. They do not exist.

Where are the IP maximist blogs with thousands upon thousands of followers and commenters in the tech industry (millions of followers with millions of hits), blogs with open discussions.

Oh wait, all of the IP maximists must come to techdirt, slashdot, and others, blogs that largely criticize their position, for an audience. Because they can’t start their own pro-IP blog and expect to get such an audience.

Give me a break. No one believes a word you say.

Anonymous Coward says:

Re: Re:

“that are making money hand over fist “

and how are they making so much money if these viewpoints aren’t widely possessed? You contradict yourself so badly.

“Likewise, the call for international cooperation to address the issues underlying the illegal distribution of rights holder content.”

These views are as widely agreed upon as 95+ year copy protection lengths. No one, besides industry interests and their puppet politicians, want them.

“Otherwise, they are money grubbers who deserve out collective disdain.”

Yes, because anyone who simply disagrees with you deserves disdain. Is that your position?

“That is the nature of give and take within the technical community.”

95+ year copy protection lengths and retroactive copy protection extensions isn’t a give and take compromise, it’s the big corporations outright stealing from the public. It’s nothing short of public domain theft.

Our laws are nothing close to a compromise. They’re a one sided decision. The government has wrongfully granted monopoly power over broadcasting spectra, cableco infrastructure, and it has wrongfully passed laws that enable collection societies to easily scare restaurants and other venues into not hosting independent performers (at least without paying some irrelevant third party licensing fees under the pretext that someone ‘might’ infringe). The patent office grants patent trolls ridiculous patents and it’s largely hindering innovation. The U.S. does much of the pharmaceutical R&D and then big pharma gets the patents.

The government grants monopolies on so many other things just as well (taxi cab monopolies among many others).

These aren’t a give and take compromise, they’re a one sided, anti-consumer and anti-innovation, decision.

The eejit (profile) says:

Re: Re:

Please, fuck off with your “both sides” argument. There is only one side that is actually paralegally purchasing laws to suit them. There is only one side who keeps on trying to make a civil matter criminal. There is only one side consistently behaving in a hypocritical manner. There is only one side attempting to racketeer a market that can no longer be so. There is only one side who consistently refuses to adapt to a really fucking simple money-making machine.

Richard (profile) says:

Re: Re: Re:

Yes – a common tactic is to take a really extreme position on one side and then argue for a compromise between that position and your opponent’s – thereby achieving the result you originally wanted without having to make an argument at all.

When someone asks for a compromise or to “see both sides of the argument” it ought to be a warning that they don’t actually have a real case.

Anonymous Coward says:

The gravamen of my comment was that the letter prepared by these 5 individuals was directed solely to a single technical issue.

What troubles me, however, it the total absence of any mention that these same individuals expressing technical concerns also expressed support for that which undelies the proposed legislation and call for increased international cooperation to help stem the tide of infringment via the expediency of the internet.

While their technical argument cuts in a direction that apparently is well received here, a discussion of a letter that ignores two other very important points does not represent an accurate depiction of the letter taken as a whole.

Those who select only one of three points are being intellectually dishonest since the selection is but one of three points, the latter two of which are diametrically opposed to comments that appear here with great frequency.

Are they correct in their belief that the legislastion is otherwise acceptable? Are they correct in their belief that international cooperation (e.g., matters like ACTA or something closely allied with them) is likewise a proper view as they express?

Add Your Comment

Your email address will not be published.

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here

Comment Options:

Make this the or (get credits or sign in to see balance) what's this?

What's this?

Techdirt community members with Techdirt Credits can spotlight a comment as either the "First Word" or "Last Word" on a particular comment thread. Credits can be purchased at the Techdirt Insider Shop »

Follow Techdirt

Techdirt Daily Newsletter

Techdirt Deals
Techdirt Insider Discord
The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...
Loading...