There's No Such Thing As 'Natural' Search Results; Search Results Are Inherently Biased
from the what-a-joke dept
The Senate hearings to tar and feather Google are still ongoing, but the first round grilling of Eric Schmidt didn’t present many surprises. Basically, a lot of Senators who don’t really understand technology are upset… because Google is big. Senator Franken even admitted that his concern was over the “bigness.” Senator Blumenthal, bizarrely, talked about how Google was a wonderful story of American corporate success… before asking how best to dismantle that. For example, he even suggested that Google remove Google Maps results from searches on addresses. That’s ridiculous. For folks like myself who like getting the Google Maps result at the top, that would make my life worse. But the most ridiculous comment may have been from Senator Lee, who complained about Google’s own results messing up “natural search results.” But as Rob Pegoraro points out, this seems to assume that there is such a thing as “natural” search. Everything that Google puts on a page is a choice, and if those choices harm consumers, we’ll go elsewhere.
The other annoying thing was everyone kept pointing to “search” as if that’s the entire market. Senator Kohl even suggested that when it came to news, the only places to find news are Google or Bing. He flat out claimed that if Bing went out of business, the only way to find news would be Google. Huh?!? As we’ve noted in the past, we actually get a smaller and smaller percentage of our traffic coming from Google these days. Instead, more and more is coming from social networks and other systems. StumbleUpon, Reddit, Twitter and Facebook have all taken significant referral share from Google — and reports from other sites suggest the same thing.