Robot Journalist Writes A Better Story On College Baseball Perfect Game

from the who-what-when-where-why dept

A few weeks back, there was a fun story about how the website GWsports.com, which (as you might imagine) covers sports at George Washington University, became something of the laughing stock of the press world by publishing a game recap on a game between GW and the University of Virginia. The game recap reads pretty straightforward, opening with the fact that the GW team lost, and then spending a few paragraphs covering the various efforts by different GW players. It’s only in the seventh paragraph, out of a grand total of eight, that it finally gets around to mentioning that the opposing pitcher, Will Roberts, threw a perfect game. If you’re not a baseball fan, a “perfect game” is extremely rare. As the article does (finally) note, this is only the eighth such perfect game in NCAA Division 1 history (since 1957) and the first since 2002. Normally, you would think that any press coverage would start with the perfect game bit.

The national press, including the Washington Post, picked up on this and GW folks tried to defend the writing by noting that they’re only in the business of promoting their own teams, not others:

?This is the George Washington website,? GWU sports information director Dave Lubeski tells Romenesko. ?We?re in the business to promote our athletes and our team. We?re not claiming to be journalists.? What some call ?the buried lead? was discussed after the story was posted, says Lubeski, and it was mentioned that the perfect game could have been noted in the sub-hed. But ?we?re not in the newspaper business,? notes the SID.

I had sent that story around to a few people, because I thought it was pretty funny, but didn’t have any obvious reason to post it here… until now. Apparently, in covering the story, Deadspin wondered if perhaps the original article hadn’t actually been written by a newfangled automated software program that’s been touted as being good enough to write sports stories.

Well, it turns out that the people who wrote that software, Narrative Science, were offended that their program might be thought of as having written an article so badly written, and fed their program the data from the game, and it popped out much better versions. They actually did two versions, a “neutral” point-of-view one, and one designed for GW fans. The “neutral” one brings up the perfect game in the first paragraph. The GW POV one does wait until the third paragraph, but still seems much better than the original…

So, perhaps the author of the original has passed the reverse Turing test, when you can’t tell if a human is actually a human or a robot…

Filed Under: , , , ,

Rate this comment as insightful
Rate this comment as funny
You have rated this comment as insightful
You have rated this comment as funny
Flag this comment as abusive/trolling/spam
You have flagged this comment
The first word has already been claimed
The last word has already been claimed
Insightful Lightbulb icon Funny Laughing icon Abusive/trolling/spam Flag icon Insightful badge Lightbulb icon Funny badge Laughing icon Comments icon

Comments on “Robot Journalist Writes A Better Story On College Baseball Perfect Game”

Subscribe: RSS Leave a comment
15 Comments
Frosty840 says:

Crappy URL formatting

Totally unrelated to the content of this story, but I’m noticing that URLs from a certain batch of websites are completely failing to work, sending me to some kind of homepage/story list every time.

The link in the article is: http://deadspin.com/#!5787397/we-heard-from-the-robot-and-it-wrote-a-better-story-about-that-perfect-game which doesn’t work.

I searched their website and discovered that the URL: http://uk.deadspin.com/5787397/we-heard-from-the-robot-and-it-wrote-a-better-story-about-that-perfect-game works fine.

Very strangely, the “uk” at the start of the URL is important, as it prevents corruption of the link.

Heading to http://deadspin.com/5787397/we-heard-from-the-robot-and-it-wrote-a-better-story-about-that-perfect-game works, but sets the URL to http://deadspin.com/#!5787397/we-heard-from-the-robot-and-it-wrote-a-better-story-about-that-perfect-game (#! added, as in the original link). After trying this, the #! link now works in new browser sessions, but trying to click through to new #! links (from other linking sites, via a google search) still fails.

Not your fault, Mike, but you might want to keep an eye on this when linking from this group of websites in the future, as it seems to be pretty consistent across the group.

And now, back to your regularly scheduled etc, etc.

Add Your Comment

Your email address will not be published.

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here

Comment Options:

Make this the or (get credits or sign in to see balance) what's this?

What's this?

Techdirt community members with Techdirt Credits can spotlight a comment as either the "First Word" or "Last Word" on a particular comment thread. Credits can be purchased at the Techdirt Insider Shop »

Follow Techdirt

Techdirt Daily Newsletter

Techdirt Deals
Techdirt Insider Discord
The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...
Loading...