California Judge In Charge Of Enforcing Laws Against Robocalls, Using Robocalls Herself

from the that-doesn't-seem-right dept

Thomas Hawk writes “Victoria Kolakowski, a current sitting law judge at the California PUC, is running for Alameda Superior Court judge in California. As part of her campaign she is robodialing people in California with a pre-recorded message. The only problem is that in Califorina robodials are actually illegal unless first introduced by a non-recorded natural person who gains consent to play the call. Ironically, the very agency set up to protect our privacy and enforce this law, the California PUC, is the very agency where Kolakowski works today. Kolakowski originally apologized for the calls but then later deleted messages on her Facebook account from people objecting to her use of these calls. Now Kolakowski is trying to argue that because ‘techincally” she is routing her calls through Colorado from outside the state that her robodials are actually legal.”

Filed Under: ,

Rate this comment as insightful
Rate this comment as funny
You have rated this comment as insightful
You have rated this comment as funny
Flag this comment as abusive/trolling/spam
You have flagged this comment
The first word has already been claimed
The last word has already been claimed
Insightful Lightbulb icon Funny Laughing icon Abusive/trolling/spam Flag icon Insightful badge Lightbulb icon Funny badge Laughing icon Comments icon

Comments on “California Judge In Charge Of Enforcing Laws Against Robocalls, Using Robocalls Herself”

Subscribe: RSS Leave a comment
29 Comments
Anonymous Coward says:

Somehow I put my cell number on my vote by mail registration. Every single election I get all kinds of out-of-state robocalls about the up coming election. The law has a major loophole. I also get calls from real humans from inside california, I see caller id with numbers like 510-000-0000. Both kinds of calls are equally annoying, not sure why the law specifically singles out robocalls as the problem.

Hulser (profile) says:

Re: Re:

I don’t recall where I heard this, but aren’t robocalls to cell phones illegal for any purpose? I think the logic is similar to spamming a fax machine, since the receiver of the call incurs an actual monetary cost — as opposed to annoyance and the time cost to delete a spam e-mail, for example — they shouldn’t be allowed to call your cell phone.

Hulser (profile) says:

Re: Re: Re: Re:

no,political exception

I know there’s a political exception for the Do Not Call list, but I was still under the impression that it was illegal to make unsolicited calls to a cell phone. It’s bad enough when you have to deal with unsolicited calls on your home line — if you still have one, that is — but it’s even worse when the call uses your monthly cell phone minutes.

Dark Helmet (profile) says:

Re: Re:

“Both kinds of calls are equally annoying, not sure why the law specifically singles out robocalls as the problem.”

I think the bigger question is what kind of voting public do we have in America that robocalls and cold calls in any way effect voting practices?

Call: “Hi, this is Dark Helmet, currently running for the Illinois Senate seat that your former governor tried to sell to the highest bidder. I like cans of Perri-Air, long walks on the beach with Druish princesses, playing with my dolls, and laser beaming soldiers testicles. I am currently campaigning on the “stop the raporists, think of the children, liberal-conservative-communist style anarchy method for ensuring you have fresh air and a galaxy free of the Planet of the Apes (particularly the Mark Wahlberg version, who the fuck thought THAT was a good idea?). Please vote for me at election time.”

Citizen: “Okay.”

Dark Helmet (profile) says:

Re: Re: Re: Re:

“Seriously though, the problem is that the politician whose name is remembered is the one that gets the vote.”

Fair enough. But I have a better method for making sure my name gets remembered than robocalls. The day I announce my candidacy for any office would be exactly one day after the paperwork came through on the legal change of my name to Awesomeballs McVagina Cheese….

Sneeje (profile) says:

Re: Re: Re:2 Re:

And your profile name hasn’t been changed because…

I mean Dark Helmet has history, but Awesomeballs McVagina Cheese has well, Awesomeballs and McVagina Cheese.

Regarding your first post, I’m with you. The moment I can tell that a robocall is starting or about to start, I either press delete on my voicemail or make them eat dialtone.

Anonymous Coward says:

Re: Re: Re: Re:

“Seriously though, the problem is that the politician whose name is remembered is the one that gets the vote. It doesn’t matter why unless it is particularly unsavory.”

Isn’t that how George W. Bush got elected? People just saw “George Bush” and thought he was running again. Sheeple. Gotta love em.

Leave a Reply to Sneeje Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here

Comment Options:

Make this the or (get credits or sign in to see balance) what's this?

What's this?

Techdirt community members with Techdirt Credits can spotlight a comment as either the "First Word" or "Last Word" on a particular comment thread. Credits can be purchased at the Techdirt Insider Shop »

Follow Techdirt

Techdirt Daily Newsletter

Ctrl-Alt-Speech

A weekly news podcast from
Mike Masnick & Ben Whitelaw

Subscribe now to Ctrl-Alt-Speech »
Techdirt Deals
Techdirt Insider Discord
The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...
Loading...