Hide Techdirt is off for the long weekend! We'll be back with our regular posts tomorrow.

Police Say Facebook Is Liable In Man's Death, Because He Was At A Flashmob Organized On Facebook

from the make-it-stop dept

Following the story we just had about a judge trying to order Facebook to stop students from skipping classes, an anonymous reader sends in an even more ridiculous “blame Facebook” story. This one takes place in France, and involves a flash mob that was organized on Facebook — as many flash mobs are these days. This particular flash mob involved getting a lot of people together and having them all drink an alcoholic beverage. Tragically, however, a young man died during the flash mob (Google translation of the original story). Apparently this particular participant in the flash mob tried to slide down a guard rail, but missed, and fell off a bridge to his death. The article quotes some people suggesting Facebook should be blamed, and the person who submitted the post notes that a police spokesperson on TV also blamed Facebook:

According to Mohamed Douane, a police official representative, on a live broadcast on the TV channel BFMTV, Facebook is liable for allowing the flash mob to be made by providing a space on which you can express yourself. In addition, whoever had the idea of making the flash mob are also liable for the death of this man, and this case would be under investigation, in order to find who had the idea of such a flash mob.

Yes, it’s tragic that this guy died, but blaming Facebook? And whoever organized a get together of people, because this guy apparently drank too much? That’s going way too far.

Filed Under: , ,
Companies: facebook

Rate this comment as insightful
Rate this comment as funny
You have rated this comment as insightful
You have rated this comment as funny
Flag this comment as abusive/trolling/spam
You have flagged this comment
The first word has already been claimed
The last word has already been claimed
Insightful Lightbulb icon Funny Laughing icon Abusive/trolling/spam Flag icon Insightful badge Lightbulb icon Funny badge Laughing icon Comments icon

Comments on “Police Say Facebook Is Liable In Man's Death, Because He Was At A Flashmob Organized On Facebook”

Subscribe: RSS Leave a comment
45 Comments
bigpicture says:

Re: Missing the Point

I think that you are missing the point here. Facebook is a tool for fad idiots and if you didn’t put the tool in their hands then they could not do any harm with it.

Similar reason, and similar legal rulings as to why you should not put a gun in the hands of the mentally challenged, or bartenders do not give totally free alcohol access to the alcohol consumption challenged, or they will be liable for any adverse results.

Anonymous Coward says:

Re: Re: Missing the Point

Not event remotely the same.

Put a gun in a retard’s hand, you take away the ability of the other individual to avoid an accident. If the mentally challenged person shoots somebody, it is most clearly not the other person’s fault.

However, look at this case. The man chose, by his own will, to attend this gathering. There is no justifiable means of blaming the person who started this gathering, or even the medium in which they used to organize it (in this case, Facebook).

If we’re of the mind to excuse the actions of a person under the influence, then we wouldn’t be handing out DUI’s and prison sentences to those that have been apart of terrible accidents relating to alcohol consumption.

It was his own fault – not anyone else’s.

taoareyou (profile) says:

Re: Re: Re: Missing the Point

Imagine if I get drunk and wreck my car, killing myself. Who should my family sue? The store for selling alcohol to people? The government for allowing alcohol to be legal? The company that makes the beer? What about the car company? Or the dealer that sold me my car? Or the gas station that I fueled up at last? Maybe the city for maintaining the streets that allowed me to go buy the beer in the first place?

Maybe sue them all. They are all to blame. Certainly not me. I died. I must be a victim.

MAC says:

Re: Re: Missing the Point

What the hell ever happened to “taking responsibility for your own actions?”

Am I missing something here? Are we so wrapped up in blaming someone or something else for something that we did have we forgotten about ‘personal’ responsibility?

I was injured on a scooter because the idiot I was giving a ride to stood up at speed on a curve to impress a girl. Did I blame him? Of course not, I blamed myself for letting that idiot on the back of my scooter in the first place.

People need to grow and put responsibilty squarely where it belongs; with themseleves…

MAC says:

Re: Re: Missing the Point

What the hell ever happened to “taking responsibility for your own actions?”

Am I missing something here? Are we so wrapped up in blaming someone or something else for something that we did have we forgotten about ‘personal’ responsibility?

I was injured on a scooter because the idiot I was giving a ride to stood up at speed on a curve to impress a girl. Did I blame him? Of course not, I blamed myself for letting that idiot on the back of my scooter in the first place.

People need to grow and put responsibilty squarely where it belongs; with themseleves…

TtfnJohn (profile) says:

Re: Re: Missing the Point

“bartenders do not give totally free alcohol access to the alcohol consumption challenged,”

Gee, political correctness gone completely haywire?

For the record I’m an alcoholic (in recovery, thank you) not some namby pamby PC expression of the same. The real word, the real condition.

Second point. When I was out there practising my alcoholism I’d find a drink anywhere I could bartender rules or no bartender rules. I drank it, no one poured it down my throat, though I’d actually have appreciated that sometimes, I’m responsible for my consumption and my behaviour after consuming the stuff.

As for facebook being a home for fad idiots one could make the same argument about HuffPo (it gets easier every day to do that) or the Web in general so perhaps we should take web access and internet access away from everyone who doesn’t pass your idiocy test?

Hold it a minute! Life is a home for fad idiots! How do we test for those and make sure they no longer have access to life? Got a test for that too?

hehehe

ttfn

John

Another AC says:

Let’s see. The guy who organized the event is to be blamed, and b/c he used Facebook to ‘express himself’, the company should also be blamed.

If he tweeted about it, Twitter should be blamed. If he emailed using Hotmail or Gmail, well, Microsoft and Goggle are totally to blame too.

But why stop there? I mean they drank alcohol. If they had just drank water, this wouldn’t of happened. So we should also blame the store that sold them the alcohol. As well, just to make sure we’ve covered all the bases the maker of the alcohol should be blamed.

As others have already said, whoever put in that guard rail should be taking some of this blame too.

Someone has to be blamed after all. Accidents don’t just happen, someone must be at fault.

Danny says:

Re: Re:

There’s a lot more to blame than that.

The farmers who grew the ingredients for the alcohol.
The makers of his shoes for not preventing him from falling.
The bartender the sold him alcohol.
The people the bartender pays rent/mortgage to.
The bartender’s family (if they have any.)
(Because its their fault that the bartender took up bartending as a way to pay for stuff.)
The bartender’s boss. Its their fault for hiring the bartender.
The owner of the bar. Its their fault for putting a bar at that location.

…..

Pierre Guillery (user link) says:

Facebook, flashmobs in France, death of a drunken firefighter...

Here in France, this FB flashmob problem is making the headlines – everybody’s talking about it (lack of anything else to report?). From 5 to 10,000 people meeting in town squares, in tens of cities (one such event announced in Paris), lots of alcohol, local authorities dont know what to do…

This policeman did say what’s reported above – but the interior minister (who isn’t usually that considerate…) just said that “something needs to be done about this flashmob phenomenon – but that blaming Facebook or simply banning the events is not the answer”.

Politicians and people in the street alike are now acknowledging (some with surprise!) the “power of FB” and (all in all) recognize that the social network is just the medium. Interesting “debate”… Lots of people just discovered the “importance” of FB: over 15m accounts in France – a quarter of the entire population. 🙂

Free Capitalist (profile) says:

Re: Facebook, flashmobs in France, death of a drunken firefighter...

Thanks, Pierre. It is encouraging to hear that at least not all politicians are clinically insane.

Just be watchful of widespread reporting of this kind, as we should all be world-wide. I sometimes have my doubts that this is simply blatant ignorance. Being a tyrant is easy when a misinformed public becomes outraged at all the wrong things, for all the wrong reasons.

Jason says:

Re: Facebook, flashmobs in France, death of a drunken firefighter...

There have been many posts on this site about the police in the US using Craigslist to track down criminals, pimps etc.. However that has not stopped several attorney generals from blaming Craigslist for the activity of it’s users. Perhaps the police in France could track the flashmobs using Facebook and then arrest folks when their behavior breaks the law. They would know where they going to crop up, when it would happen and be able to react faster.

Anonymous Coward says:

Humans have an unfortunate tendency to look for scapegoats. Since they can’t make a dead man answer for his own death, they do the next thing to it by attempting to hold Facebook accountable. This satisfies the human emotional need to blame somebody other than the accident victim and possibly serves other purposes for the government such as reducing Facebook’s influence in other more important matters.

Dark Helmet (profile) says:

Re: Blame

“It’s God’s fault plain and simple!”

No, no, no, dumbass, it’s only God’s doing if it’s a GOOD thing from the point of view of whoever’s saying it. You should pay attention to post game sports interviews, where you always hear:

“Yeah, it was a good win today. First I have to thank God. Without him, none of this would be possible. It’s only because of him that we won today.”

Yet you never hear:

“Why did we lose to the Celtics? Because of God, stupid interview woman! God fucked it all up. We had an amazing gameplan, we had the best player in the league, all of our shots were on target, but then God pulled down his holy pantaloons and took a big steamy dump on us. Holy Shit! That’s what we called it during that last time out. A Holy Shit on our game. Stupid God, always making the ball clang off the rim…”

Add Your Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here

Comment Options:

Make this the or (get credits or sign in to see balance) what's this?

What's this?

Techdirt community members with Techdirt Credits can spotlight a comment as either the "First Word" or "Last Word" on a particular comment thread. Credits can be purchased at the Techdirt Insider Shop »

Follow Techdirt

Techdirt Daily Newsletter

Techdirt Deals
Techdirt Insider Discord
The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...
Loading...