UK Musician's Open Letter To Musicians Union Over Its Support Of The Digital Economy Bill

from the must-read dept

With the passing of the Digital Economy Bill in the UK, many musicians are quite upset — even though the law is supposed to be about “protecting” them. Musician Steve Lawson, a member of the Musicians Union (which supported the bill), has written a brilliant open letter to the organization, explaining why he was upset about their position, and considering leaving the group. Here’s just a snippet, but the whole thing is worth reading:

The BPI wrote the bill as a protectionist measure of an outdated and unworkable business model. It was a model that was NEVER to the advantage of musicians who cared about the music they played and the culture it existed in, but one that made sense at a time when physical distribution was required to reach anyone, and the costs involved were prohibitively high. At that point, labels lying to musicians about how much they dig the music, while making a fortune for themselves but still never “recouping” on the album was deeply unpalatable but a necessary part of recording and releasing music.

All the costs have dropped. I’ve written extensively about this — most notably here — but nothing has changed in the industry. They still spend money on the behalf of musicians, pay themselves that money, recoup it (AGAIN) and own the product at the end. None of that is remotely to our advantage.


So, the premise of the bill — that the situation is desperate — was spurious. The figures quoted for industry ‘losses’ are insane. Utterly nonsensical if mapped against spending trends on ‘physical and download entertainment media’ — we are part of a much bigger entertainment industry now that we ever were, and we don’t dominate it in the way we did from 1956 to 1998. Games and DVD are a bigger part of it than ever. And entertainment spending continues to rise. So 200 million hasn’t been ‘lost’, it’s being spent elsewhere. Meanwhile, the cost of making and distributing records is tiny, and download sales go up and up.

How you can see that as a situation that needs legislating is utterly beyond me. To shut down sites and services on suspicion of illegal activity is a civil liberties travesty. To have my internet traffic monitored ‘in case I do anything bad’ is like the royal mail reading my post, in case my letters contain naughty words. While threatening to brick up my front door if they find them, or think they might have found them.

It’s great to see musicians realizing that just because the bill’s backers claim it’s in their interest that this is not necessarily the case — and that it could very much go against their interests.

Filed Under: , ,

Rate this comment as insightful
Rate this comment as funny
You have rated this comment as insightful
You have rated this comment as funny
Flag this comment as abusive/trolling/spam
You have flagged this comment
The first word has already been claimed
The last word has already been claimed
Insightful Lightbulb icon Funny Laughing icon Abusive/trolling/spam Flag icon Insightful badge Lightbulb icon Funny badge Laughing icon Comments icon

Comments on “UK Musician's Open Letter To Musicians Union Over Its Support Of The Digital Economy Bill”

Subscribe: RSS Leave a comment
Anonymous Coward says:

Re: Re: Re: Re:

I thought my “wait, what” made it clear that the buggy whip comparison makes little to zero sense. As does the whale fat comparison.

Why even make a comparison? The article does read pretty straight forward.

Musician who loves music thinks this particular bill to save music is stupid and disagrees with his music union.


one muscian trying to save himself

doesn’t matter hes done for then.
deal with it.
change law if you can.
OR don’t.
far as I’m concerned I’m tired of France Australia and UK shit

the three a them plus America just fired torpedo’s into there own culture begin spread around the world

FOR THIS as a Canadian good i say. BY time you recover and realize how retarded you have been the rest of the world will have moved greatly on.

we in Canada rose up massively and threatened to shake the actual politics while the rest of you ( note time of dmca included )
all did them gay letter writing campaigns not realizing the very people you write to are BOUGHT AND PAID FOR. in any other thing but politics its called bribery and doing that to a copany for another is treachery so is this treason when the majority of you democracy doesn’t want it?


they say you can hang or get taken out and shot for it.
WHY NOT , do we need to set an example for politicians that make laws there people do not want.
and the time to talk about all this is quickly fading.
IF i wanted to live under a communist dictatorship of china id go live there.

or if i wanted to live under fascism id invent a time machine and go join the SS of the Hitler era

BUT i do not.
2/3 of canadians want less terms on copyright and increased non commercial fair use
remember that when you come here that we ain’t are not Iraqis that you can push around and we won’t be.

Add Your Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here

Comment Options:

Make this the or (get credits or sign in to see balance) what's this?

What's this?

Techdirt community members with Techdirt Credits can spotlight a comment as either the "First Word" or "Last Word" on a particular comment thread. Credits can be purchased at the Techdirt Insider Shop »

Follow Techdirt

Techdirt Daily Newsletter

Techdirt Deals
Techdirt Insider Discord
The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...