Horror Blogger Threatened With Defamation And Copyright Lawsuits After Writing An Open Letter To Horror Magazine

from the now-that's-horrifying dept

It’s amazing how some people seem to think that basic criticism is defamatory. We recently wrote about how the editor of a journal that published a review of a legal book is now facing a defamation lawsuit in France, even though the book review was just a typical book review (and only slightly negative). Now, Robert Ring points us to the news of a “horror” blogger who wrote a somewhat critical “open letter” to the horror magazine Gorezone, complaining about the apparent grammar and spelling problems in the magazine combined with what the blogger felt was rather sexist content. Frankly, the open letter isn’t even that critical. It’s one blogger’s opinion with some constructive criticism.

In response, however, after the blogger’s comments were flooded with angry responses (allegedly a bunch all came from the same IP address, which is connected with Gorezone), Gorezone threatened legal action for both defamation and copyright infringement. Apparently, this would be in the UK, where (as we know all too well) defamation laws are pretty ridiculous. Even so, it’s difficult to see how anything in the original post is libelous. As for the copyright infringement, the blogger had used (but has since taken down) an image of a recent cover of Gorezone to prove his point. It’s difficult to see how this would be considered infringement as well, as the blog post was clearly commenting on the image, and certainly wasn’t competing with Gorezone. Of course, again, this is UK law, but there is the concept of fair use/fair dealing in the UK, and it’s difficult to see how this wouldn’t be covered.

As the link above suggests, this sounds like a SLAPP situation, where the magazine doesn’t like the criticism it’s received, and its response is to threaten the blogger to try to bully him into taking down the content. We see this all too often, and it’s why the world needs more anti-SLAPP protections and laws.

Filed Under: , , , ,
Companies: gorezine

Rate this comment as insightful
Rate this comment as funny
You have rated this comment as insightful
You have rated this comment as funny
Flag this comment as abusive/trolling/spam
You have flagged this comment
The first word has already been claimed
The last word has already been claimed
Insightful Lightbulb icon Funny Laughing icon Abusive/trolling/spam Flag icon Insightful badge Lightbulb icon Funny badge Laughing icon Comments icon

Comments on “Horror Blogger Threatened With Defamation And Copyright Lawsuits After Writing An Open Letter To Horror Magazine”

Subscribe: RSS Leave a comment
Hymie says:

I can Hardly wait

It’s going to be really interesting when the ‘Movie producers’ start suing the movie critics that slam their movies and blame the critics for poor box office and a loss of revenue from the movie. Never mind whether the movie is actually good or bad. I wonder what would happen if I published the fact that I thought a some movie “sex symbol” was homely and not my idea of sexy and wouldn’t bed her on a bet. Would that leave me open to this kind of suit?

Fushta says:

We all make mistakes, but...

We all make mistakes, but what makes a person/company/etc truly stand-up is how they make up for those mistakes. Mike points out all the time about companies that use these SLAPP tactics to try to remove negative “press” about them. All they have to do is man-up, and fix the problem. At the end of the day, they will be much better off fixing their problems than trying to bury them.



NO cause in your own words your saying it was an opinion.
thats the mucky part of it.it has to cause harm to reputtion as a falsehood

SO you’d take a poll and if the majority said it sucked you could be right.
WHICH is why i dont listen to movie critics

i thought avatar actually sucked.
AND i do not like having to buy 3d googles to watch anyhting or buy into technology that does this irritating bull crap

thats an opinion
NOT saying that they used sub standard actors and sub standard sets and the director is a child molester.
OF which a lot is actually false.

SEE the differance

Jonthecelt says:

A little late to the party...

I’m a little late to the party here, but just wanted to throw my tuppenorth in…

Firstly, a moment of context – I’m a regular GoreZone reader, contributor to the forums (fora? if we’re being sticklers…) on their site, and consider myself friends to several of the staff after meeting them at last year’s filmfest. That said, I am not going to rush unquestioningly to their defence…

Having read both the original blog (plus comments), and the GoreZone management’s open response to the blog, it’s my understanding that something very odd was happening. DangerousJamie discovered that many of the aggressive, apparently pro-GZ posters were all sending their messages from the same IP address, and concluded that they were all staff for the magazine. The trouble is, that several of the claimed IDs from that IP address were not staffers for the magazine, but regular readers and posters to the GZ forums, whose namesake were seemingly being used by person or persons unknown. Bryn Hammond, the editor-in-chief of GZ magazine, has stated categorically that these posts did NOT come from their offices, and can prove that their IP address is quite different. It is because of this defamation of character (posters claiming to be himself and other members of the GZ forums), rather than the original blog, which led to Bryn asking that the whole thing be shut down and removed. And it is because this request has been denied, and the writer of the blog persists in claiming that it was Bryn and fellow staffers who wrote those antagonistic “flames”, that he is seeking legal advice.

Without wishing to sound like I’m teaching anyone here to suck eggs, isn’t it worth checking out both sides of a story – or trying to obtain as many facts as possible – before reporting it as news? It’s somethng I felt I had to do before writing this comment: the last thing I wanted to do was leap to Bryn’s defence if he HAD done something I would consider in bad form.

Anyway, that’s me done. Just felt I needed to redress the balance here and clarify a few points.

Be happy


toni says:

I’m being threatened with a suit for defamation for a blog I wrote about a UK finance company.
Being threatened with a suit is a very NOT-fun experience.
I don’t know if they’ll carry it out.
I’m trying to find anything I can about the outcome of these types of suits if they ever reach court.
I’ve come across 4 so far which were all settled out of court.
Does anyone know what happened with this one??

ps blog is welbeckwealth.wordpress.com

Add Your Comment

Your email address will not be published.

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here

Comment Options:

Make this the or (get credits or sign in to see balance) what's this?

What's this?

Techdirt community members with Techdirt Credits can spotlight a comment as either the "First Word" or "Last Word" on a particular comment thread. Credits can be purchased at the Techdirt Insider Shop »

Follow Techdirt

Techdirt Daily Newsletter

Techdirt Deals
Techdirt Insider Discord
The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...