Sen. Durbin To Introduce Bill Sanctioning Companies That Don't Protect Human Rights Abroad; But What About At Home?

from the the-two-step-shuffle dept

Senator Dick Durbin is introducing legislation to sanction companies that don’t take “reasonable steps” to protect the human rights of people abroad. This is obviously targeted at companies doing business in places like China, where famously, government officials have used US technologies as well as worked with US-based companies to censor the internet and spy on citizens.

While I can understand the reasoning behind such a bill, my question is why is this limited to abroad? Here in the US, AT&T eagerly helped the administration in spying on users with no warrant and no official process (even allowing private info to be passed on with just a post-it note request). And what about efforts by US lawmakers to put in place third party liability — similar to that which is used in China to censor the internet — on copyright issues? Shouldn’t there be sanctions for that as well?

Sanctioning companies that help regimes violate human and civil rights is perfectly reasonable — but Durbin is kidding himself if he thinks this sort of thing only happens outside of the US. Let’s clean things up at home first.

Filed Under: , ,

Rate this comment as insightful
Rate this comment as funny
You have rated this comment as insightful
You have rated this comment as funny
Flag this comment as abusive/trolling/spam
You have flagged this comment
The first word has already been claimed
The last word has already been claimed
Insightful Lightbulb icon Funny Laughing icon Abusive/trolling/spam Flag icon Insightful badge Lightbulb icon Funny badge Laughing icon Comments icon

Comments on “Sen. Durbin To Introduce Bill Sanctioning Companies That Don't Protect Human Rights Abroad; But What About At Home?”

Subscribe: RSS Leave a comment


ya know honestly i think the USa needs to take a serious step back and look at itself and how the rest of the world is beginning to see it… a fraking joke.

YA know they really must think the world is a bunch a retards yet they do stuff like this which affirms my belief that evolution doesn’t always work out for a species.

Bigles says:

> my question is why is this limited to abroad?

I see you are still under the illusion that anyone in any law making capacity in your country actually cares about regular people. That train left the station a long time ago, and ain’t comin’ back. In fact, once the Republicans get back into power, look for it to get even worse (as if that even seems possible).

You guys are on the decline, and the sad thing, is you voted for all this. Sad.

fogbugzd (profile) says:

ERA Memories

This reminds me of back in the ’70’s when people were trying to get the Equal Rights Amendment ratified. Someone in the legislature proposed a bill that would have prohibited travel to any state that had not ratified the ERA. Another Senator felt this was entirely too limiting, and proposed an amendment that would prohibit travel to any COUNTRY that had not ratified the ERA. Of course, since the ERA was an amendment to the US constitution, no other country would have any reason to ratify it. To add to the idiocy, the original law was proposed because the US itself had not ratified the ERA.

As a budget cutting measure it would have been great because it would have shut down all junkets to anywhere.

Anonymous Coward says:

dumbest post ever?

This might be the dumbest post i’ve ever read on this site. I generally find this site highly informative, but every now and then something like this shows up and makes me wonder whether I’m reading the Onion. Are you really comparing human rights abuses to proposals for secondary liability? Lolz

Anonymous Coward says:

Re: dumbest post ever?

Did you even bother reading the linked article? Either way, you’re an absolute idiot. Here’s the first paragraph for you, enjoy:

“Internet companies that fail to take “reasonable steps” to safeguard human rights in foreign countries could face sanctions under a forthcoming bill by Senate Democratic Whip Dick Durbin (Ill.).”

Yes, God forbid that Mike dare to compare international internet policies with domestic internet policies. Shame on him.

RT Cunningham (profile) says:

Sanctioning Who?

I’m a US citizen living abroad in a country where human rights seem to be violated daily, but human rights is like everything else. It’s in the eye of the beholder.

US politicians like to try telling other countries how to behave, even though the the other countries’ behavior is perfectly acceptable by their own standards.

Once again, Mike nails it on the head – clean up you own back yard before you try to clean up someone else’s.

Beta says:

Re: Re: oldthinkers unnewspeak

The original meaning of the noun was either permission or punishment (I admit I just learned about the punishment part). The noun was verbed in the 18th century to mean permission, blessing. Then in the twentieth century, when certain nations were trying to find forms of agression milder and more selective than blockades, they started witholding sanction for various things. So “sanctions” became associated with harsh international imposition, and with just a little carelessness we got this mess, where the only way to keep the opposite meanings straight is by tiny cues: “sanctions” (plural noun) are punishments, “sanction” (uncountable noun) is permission or blessing, “a sanction” is ambiguous, “sanction” (verb) means permit or bless, and using it to mean “impose sanctions” throws grammar fiends like me into fits.

Add Your Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here

Comment Options:

Make this the or (get credits or sign in to see balance) what's this?

What's this?

Techdirt community members with Techdirt Credits can spotlight a comment as either the "First Word" or "Last Word" on a particular comment thread. Credits can be purchased at the Techdirt Insider Shop »

Follow Techdirt

Techdirt Daily Newsletter

Techdirt Deals
Techdirt Insider Discord
The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...