Conference Board Of Canada Releases New Report On Copyright That Isn't Just A Cut And Paste From US Lobbyists

from the well,-that's-a-start dept

You may remember last year that the Conference Board of Canada (who, until then, was pretty well respected) released a report on “intellectual property policy” that was blatantly plagiarized from US copyright industry lobbyists. While the Conference Board at first insisted that it stood by the report, eventually it recalled three reports and admitted that they “did not follow the high quality research standards” of the organization. Many months later, it appears that the replacement report has been released, and it’s much more balanced. I still think there’s plenty in the report that doesn’t make much sense to me, but it’s significantly better than the totally one-sided, blatantly plagiarized piece from last year.

Filed Under: , ,
Companies: conference board of canada

Rate this comment as insightful
Rate this comment as funny
You have rated this comment as insightful
You have rated this comment as funny
Flag this comment as abusive/trolling/spam
You have flagged this comment
The first word has already been claimed
The last word has already been claimed
Insightful Lightbulb icon Funny Laughing icon Abusive/trolling/spam Flag icon Insightful badge Lightbulb icon Funny badge Laughing icon Comments icon

Comments on “Conference Board Of Canada Releases New Report On Copyright That Isn't Just A Cut And Paste From US Lobbyists”

Subscribe: RSS Leave a comment
7 Comments
:) says:

About balances.

I like discussions but there needs to be public participation on the process too and this is why I shameslly will spam you guys now and I’m sorry for it.

The U.S. government is collecting public input.

Broadband discussion
http://broadband.ideascale.com/

Copyright discussion that happens every year so every year you citizen can complain too, don’t let only the industry complain.

http://www.publicknowledge.org/node/2891

Comments can be filed electronically via http://www.regulations.gov, docket number USTR-2010-0003. You have to include the term “2010 Special 301 Review” in the “Type Comment and Upload File” field. More information about the Special 301 process is available here. Deadline for filing is February 16 by 5 p.m.

Maybe that way the U.S. can see some “balance” in the proposals too.

ant anti mike says:

YA KNOW ITS A SHAM LIKE TH COPYRIGHT CONSULTATIONS

it was leaked that they were used to through everyone off while ACTA moved forward and as geist says that ACTA will require changes to canuck law , although that does require parliament and both liberals and conservatives have both tried to do dmca style laws this bodes badly aand unless iggy wants harper to keep ruling after prorogation and go full term

then get his numbers lessened and also them conservatives want to see the NDP massively grow across canada
then i suggest iggy grow some balls and use that harvard brain and realize that ACTA also is not good for canad and join the rest of the world and oppose it

a majority of the house would force the agreement open.
i ferget her name but that one member of the PQ is slanted ironically to hollywood bills too so you can count out the beloved PQ they will SARKOZY YOU.

and where is the investigation by the rcmp fraud squad into where the money is going for the cdr levy like i dunno where 450-500 million went ? where is the artists money going ?

Add Your Comment

Your email address will not be published.

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here

Comment Options:

Make this the or (get credits or sign in to see balance) what's this?

What's this?

Techdirt community members with Techdirt Credits can spotlight a comment as either the "First Word" or "Last Word" on a particular comment thread. Credits can be purchased at the Techdirt Insider Shop »